| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Halle (Saale) | S 31 AS 814/21 | 24.10.2022 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 2 AS 594/22 B | 28.12.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 31. Januar 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Halle (Saale) | S 10 AS 168/18 | 24.04.2022 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 2 AS 345/22 B | 14.09.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 31. Januar 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Magdeburg | S 9 SB 491/16 | 25.11.2019 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 7 SB 7/20 | 05.12.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 31. Januar 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Magdeburg | S 16 AS 2544/14 | 22.08.2018 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 5 AS 708/18 | 09.11.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 31. Januar 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Halle (Saale) | S 25 AS 3378/15 | 07.03.2018 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 2 AS 649/18 | 16.11.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 31. Januar 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Magdeburg | S 24 AS 1364/19 | 04.12.2019 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 5 AS 34/20 | 09.11.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 31. Januar 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Halle (Saale) | S 3 EG 11/19 | 21.09.2021 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 2 EG 3/21 | 15.12.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 31. Januar 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 30 SO 134/15 | 29.11.2019 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 SO 53/20 | 23.11.2022 | - | Sozialgericht Frankfurt | 31. Januar 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt (Oder) | S 36 VJ 19/10 | 11.01.2017 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 13 VJ 21/17 | 25.11.2022 | B 9 V 2/23 B | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 31. Januar 2023 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 82 AS 11964/16 | 18.10.2017 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 29 AS 2166/17 | 09.12.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 31. Januar 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 33 VJ 50/11 | 16.06.2015 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 13 VJ 35/18 WA | 01.12.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 31. Januar 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Cottbus | S 14 AS 602/20 | 24.08.2021 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 27 AS 1192/21 | 10.11.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 31. Januar 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Neuruppin | S 26 AS 72/17 | 22.02.2021 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 27 AS 316/21 | 10.11.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 31. Januar 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Halle (Saale) | S 21 U 76/17 | 06.07.2020 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 6 U 61/20 | 14.12.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 30. Januar 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Köln | S 37 AS 440/20 | 03.08.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 21 AS 1230/20 | 26.09.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 30. Januar 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Köln | S 36 KR 1978/19 | 06.02.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 11 KR 96/20 | 02.02.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 2/22 BH | 19.12.2022 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 30. Januar 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Aachen | S 10 AL 146/17 | 18.01.2019 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 9 AL 34/19 | 31.05.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | B 11 AL 35/21 R | 29.11.2022 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 30. Januar 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 35 AS 2813/22 ER | 17.11.2022 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 19 AS 1775/22 B ER | 16.01.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 30. Januar 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 48 KR 6271/19 | 12.05.2021 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 11 KR 547/21 | 15.06.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 KR 1/23 R | 15.06.2022 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 30. Januar 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Köln | S 36 KR 2035/19 | 06.02.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 11 KR 390/21 | 02.02.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 3/22 BH | 19.12.2022 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 30. Januar 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 14 U 179/18 | 17.08.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 15 U 425/20 | 30.08.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 133/22 B | 29.12.2022 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 30. Januar 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 24 AS 645/15 | 13.05.2019 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 21 AS 1257/19 | 29.04.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 7 AS 224/22 BH | 12.12.2022 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 30. Januar 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 24 AS 2924/15 | 13.05.2019 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 21 AS 1268/19 | 29.04.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 7 AS 225/22 BH | 12.12.2022 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 30. Januar 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Detmold | S 16 KR 1034/21 | 08.11.2022 | - | - | Sozialgericht Detmold | 30. Januar 2023 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Reutlingen | S 9 KR 2096/15 | 29.07.2016 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 5 KR 3726/19 | 23.11.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 27. Januar 2023 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 163 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 163 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 163 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 4050, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161619 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-01-31 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-01-31 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 AS 594/22 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-as-594-22-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:46:17 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:46:17 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-as-594-22-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161618 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-01-31 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-01-31 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 AS 345/22 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-as-345-22-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:46:14 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:46:14 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-as-345-22-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161617 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-01-31 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-01-31 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 SB 7/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-sb-7-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:46:12 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:46:12 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-sb-7-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161616 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-01-31 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-01-31 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 AS 708/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-as-708-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:46:08 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:46:08 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-as-708-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161615 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-01-31 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-01-31 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 AS 649/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-as-649-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:46:05 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:46:05 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-as-649-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161614 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-01-31 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-01-31 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 AS 34/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-as-34-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:46:00 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:46:00 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-as-34-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161613 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-01-31 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-01-31 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 EG 3/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-eg-3-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:45:57 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:45:57 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-eg-3-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 136994 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-01-31 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-01-31 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 30 SO 134/15 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-30-so-134-15 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:42:16 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:42:16 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-30-so-134-15/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128662 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-01-31 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-01-31 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 13 VJ 21/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-13-vj-21-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:42:37 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:42:37 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-13-vj-21-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128656 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-01-31 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-01-31 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 29 AS 2166/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-29-as-2166-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:42:32 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:42:32 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-29-as-2166-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128652 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-01-31 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-01-31 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 13 VJ 35/28 WA [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-13-vj-35-28-wa [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:42:30 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:42:30 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-13-vj-35-28-wa/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128648 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-01-31 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-01-31 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 27 AS 1192/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-27-as-1192-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:42:27 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:42:27 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-27-as-1192-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128645 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-01-31 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-01-31 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 27 AS 316/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-27-as-316-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:42:25 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:42:25 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-27-as-316-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161612 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-01-30 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-01-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 U 61/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-u-61-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:45:53 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:45:53 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-u-61-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 148716 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-01-30 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-01-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 21 AS 1230/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-21-as-1230-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:34:46 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:34:46 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-21-as-1230-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 148711 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-01-30 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-01-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 KR 96/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-kr-96-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:34:44 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:34:44 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-kr-96-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 148706 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-01-30 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-01-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 AL 34/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-al-34-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:34:41 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:34:41 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-al-34-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 148702 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-01-30 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-01-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 19 AS 1775/22 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-19-as-1775-22-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:34:39 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:34:39 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-19-as-1775-22-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 148697 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-01-30 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-01-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 KR 547/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-kr-547-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:34:36 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:34:36 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-kr-547-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 148692 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-01-30 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-01-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 KR 390/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-kr-390-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:34:33 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:34:33 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-kr-390-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 148687 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-01-30 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-01-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 15 U 425/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-15-u-425-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:34:31 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:34:31 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-15-u-425-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 148680 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-01-30 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-01-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 21 AS 1257/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-21-as-1257-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:34:27 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:34:27 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-21-as-1257-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 148674 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-01-30 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-01-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 21 AS 1268/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-21-as-1268-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:34:24 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:34:24 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-21-as-1268-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140306 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-01-30 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-01-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 16 KR 1034/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-16-kr-1034-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:17:46 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:17:46 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-16-kr-1034-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 158338 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-01-27 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-01-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KR 3726/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-kr-3726-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:55:40 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:55:40 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-kr-3726-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161619 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-01-31 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-01-31 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 AS 594/22 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-as-594-22-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:46:17 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:46:17 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-as-594-22-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 93457eb8dd88231d272ad4341ba20ab1 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:1f0c85e4706642a8665eb6d7a15c2cd0:0.61808800 1747928270 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.