| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 14 BA 4315/18 | 10.09.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 5 BA 3206/21 | 23.11.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 27. Januar 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Heilbronn | S 16 KR 1007/22 | 27.06.2022 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 5 KR 2043/22 | 23.11.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 104/22 B | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 27. Januar 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 3 KR 1817/19 | 04.05.2022 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 5 KR 1505/22 | 23.11.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 27. Januar 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 5 KA 3545/19 | 30.10.2020 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 5 KA 107/21 | 26.10.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 6 KA 24/22 R | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 27. Januar 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 30 SO 134/15 | 29.11.2019 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 SO 53/20 | 23.11.2022 | - | Sozialgericht Frankfurt | 27. Januar 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Nürnberg | S 24 R 415/21 | 14.03.2022 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 19 R 140/22 | 17.10.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 5 R 118/22 AR | 01.12.2022 | Sozialgericht Nürnberg | 27. Januar 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Nürnberg | S 19 P 132/20 | 30.07.2021 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 P 56/21 | 22.09.2022 | - | Sozialgericht Nürnberg | 27. Januar 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Nürnberg | S 19 P 132/20 | 30.07.2021 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 P 56/21 | 22.09.2022 | - | Sozialgericht Nürnberg | 27. Januar 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Nürnberg | S 13 KA 6/21 | 05.10.2022 | - | - | Sozialgericht Nürnberg | 27. Januar 2023 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Nürnberg | S 9 R 1274/16 | 29.05.2018 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 19 R 331/18 | 26.12.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 5 R 18/22 R | - | Sozialgericht Nürnberg | 27. Januar 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Nürnberg | S 5 AS 1257/12 | 11.07.2013 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 11 AS 516/13 NZB | 12.09.2013 | - | Sozialgericht Nürnberg | 27. Januar 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Nürnberg | S 3 BA 118/20 | 27.04.2021 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 14 R 622/21 | 10.11.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 R 11/22 R | - | Sozialgericht Nürnberg | 27. Januar 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Köln | S 28 VG 12/20 | 23.02.2021 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 13 VG 24/21 | 19.05.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 9 V 28/22 B | 07.12.2022 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 26. Januar 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Köln | S 2 R 1283/18 | 26.03.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 14 R 659/20 | 29.04.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 5 R 36/22 BH | 09.12.2022 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 26. Januar 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 79 (21) U 304/17 | 29.04.2021 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 10 U 304/21 | 08.06.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 93/22 B | 14.12.2022 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 26. Januar 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Detmold | S 2 SO 297/18 | 27.05.2019 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 20 SO 314/19 | 27.01.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 8 SO 20/20 B | 12.08.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 26. Januar 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Gießen | S 17 R 278/17 | 02.09.2021 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 1 BA 76/21 | 12.05.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 BA 8/22 R | - | Sozialgericht Gießen | 26. Januar 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Gießen | S 17 R 278/17 | 02.09.2021 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 1 BA 76/21 | 12.05.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 BA 8/22 R | - | Sozialgericht Gießen | 26. Januar 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Bayreuth | S 4 U 25/20 | 18.05.2021 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 17 U 168/21 | 06.12.2022 | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 26. Januar 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht München | S 27 R 299/20 | 05.08.2021 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 13 R 480/21 | 20.09.2022 | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 26. Januar 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Nürnberg | S 4 R 602/20 | 29.06.2021 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 13 R 423/21 | 20.09.2022 | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 26. Januar 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 17 R 242/22 | 11.10.2022 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 16 R 580/22 | 12.01.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 26. Januar 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 215 AS 5207/22 ER | 22.11.2022 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 18 AS 1084/22 B ER | 13.12.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 26. Januar 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Potsdam | S 18 AL 210/16 | 27.08.2019 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 18 AL 127/19 | 24.11.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 26. Januar 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 17 R 1698/21 | 05.04.2022 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 17 R 202/22 NZB | 07.11.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 26. Januar 2023 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 164 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 164 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 164 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 4075, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 158332 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-01-27 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-01-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 BA 3206/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-ba-3206-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:55:37 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:55:37 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-ba-3206-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 158329 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-01-27 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-01-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KR 2043/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-kr-2043-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:55:34 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:55:34 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-kr-2043-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 158324 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-01-27 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-01-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KR 1505/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-kr-1505-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:55:31 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:55:31 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-kr-1505-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 158320 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-01-27 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-01-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KA 107/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-ka-107-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:55:28 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:55:28 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-ka-107-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 136989 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-01-27 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-01-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 SO 53/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-so-53-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:42:14 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:42:14 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-so-53-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134730 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-01-27 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-01-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 24 R 415/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-24-r-415-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:24:09 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:24:09 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-24-r-415-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134726 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-01-27 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-01-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 19 P 132/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-19-p-132-20-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:24:07 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:24:07 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-19-p-132-20-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134725 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-01-27 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-01-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 19 P 132/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-19-p-132-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:24:07 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:24:07 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-19-p-132-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134722 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-01-27 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-01-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 13 KA 6/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-13-ka-6-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:24:05 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:24:05 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-13-ka-6-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134718 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-01-27 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-01-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 9 R 1274/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-9-r-1274-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:24:03 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:24:03 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-9-r-1274-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134714 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-01-27 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-01-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 5 AS 1257/12 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-5-as-1257-12 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:24:02 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:24:02 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-5-as-1257-12/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134710 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-01-27 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-01-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 3 BA 118/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-3-ba-118-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:24:00 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:24:00 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-3-ba-118-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 148668 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-01-26 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-01-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 13 VG 24/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-13-vg-24-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:34:20 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:34:20 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-13-vg-24-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 148662 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-01-26 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-01-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 14 R 659/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-14-r-659-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:34:17 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:34:17 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-14-r-659-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 148655 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-01-26 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-01-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 U 304/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-u-304-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:34:13 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:34:13 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-u-304-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 148650 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-01-26 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-01-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 20 SO 314/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-20-so-314-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:34:10 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:34:10 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-20-so-314-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134953 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-01-26 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-01-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 17 R 278/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-17-r-278-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:27:27 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:27:27 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-17-r-278-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134952 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-01-26 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-01-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 BA 76/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-ba-76-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:27:26 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:27:26 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-ba-76-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130749 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-01-26 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-01-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 17 U 168/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-17-u-168-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:09:33 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:09:33 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-17-u-168-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130748 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-01-26 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-01-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 13 R 480/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-13-r-480-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:09:32 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:09:32 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-13-r-480-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130747 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-01-26 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-01-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 13 R 423/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-13-r-423-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:09:30 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:09:30 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-13-r-423-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128642 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-01-26 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-01-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 16 R 580/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-16-r-580-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:42:23 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:42:23 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-16-r-580-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128639 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-01-26 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-01-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 18 AS 1084/22 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-18-as-1084-22-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:42:22 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:42:22 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-18-as-1084-22-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128634 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-01-26 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-01-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 18 AL 127/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-18-al-127-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:42:19 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:42:19 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-18-al-127-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128631 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-01-26 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-01-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 17 R 202/22 NZB [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-17-r-202-22-nzb [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:42:16 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:42:16 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-17-r-202-22-nzb/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 158332 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-01-27 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-01-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 BA 3206/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-ba-3206-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:55:37 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:55:37 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-ba-3206-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => d6f6493f14ccd7db04b348e747488c00 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:0969875cf86002d202ef4958086d203c:0.81390400 1747947013 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.