| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 198 KR 3285/15 | 14.01.2020 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 16 KR 156/20 | 20.10.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 26. Januar 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 36 KR 1817/17 | 16.11.2018 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 16 BA 121/18 | 28.09.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 26. Januar 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Potsdam | S 49 AS 660/22 ER | 29.08.2022 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 18 AS 884/22 B ER | 13.10.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 26. Januar 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Potsdam | S 49 AS 660/22 ER | 29.08.2022 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 18 AS 884/22 B ER | 13.10.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 26. Januar 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Potsdam | S 49 AS 680/21 | 22.06.2022 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 18 AS 778/22 NZB | 29.09.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 26. Januar 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt (Oder) | S 17 AS 970/20 WA | 05.02.2021 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 18 AS 293/21 | 28.09.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 26. Januar 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Cottbus | S 6 R 486/17 | 16.07.2020 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 16 R 685/20 | 19.09.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 26. Januar 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 126 AS 2245/18 | 20.09.2021 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 18 AS 1112/21 | 30.08.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 26. Januar 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 188 R 1421/20 | 12.08.2021 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 16 R 551/21 | 19.09.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 26. Januar 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Cottbus | S 9 AL 235/16 | 24.08.2020 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 18 AL 97/20 | 25.08.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 26. Januar 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 127 AS 6359/21 | 05.08.2022 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 18 AS 784/22 B PKH | 25.08.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 26. Januar 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 99 AS 12266/20 | 04.11.2019 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 18 AS 225/20 | 10.08.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 26. Januar 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 97 R 1128/20 | 12.01.2021 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 16 R 85/21 | 10.08.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 5 R 13/22 R | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 26. Januar 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Neuruppin | S 13 AS 887/18 | 30.05.2018 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 18 AS 548/22 | 08.08.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 26. Januar 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 200 AS 2510/22 ER | 30.06.2022 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 18 AS 678/22 B ER | 25.07.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 26. Januar 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Potsdam | S 6 AL 122/20 | 15.04.2021 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 18 AL 45/21 | 27.02.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 26. Januar 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 26 AL 431/18 | 25.01.2022 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 18 AL 17/22 | 27.04.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 26. Januar 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Gotha | S 2 KA 2702/18 | 03.02.2021 | - | Bundessozialgericht | B 6 KA 11/21 R | 07.09.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | 26. Januar 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 117 AS 3604/15 | 09.12.2019 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 3 AS 50/20 | 13.12.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 7 AS 3/23 R | - | Sozialgericht Berlin | 25. Januar 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Nürnberg | S 24 R 415/21 | 14.03.2022 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 19 R 140/22 | 17.10.2022 | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 25. Januar 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 114 AS 24896/15 | 13.05.2019 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 3 AS 1050/19 | 13.12.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 25. Januar 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Detmold | S 28 BA 11/21 ER | 22.03.2021 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 8 BA 54/21 B ER | 07.07.2021 | - | Sozialgericht Detmold | 24. Januar 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Altenburg | S 3 U 1883/19 | 20.07.2021 | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | L 1 U 723/21 | 04.08.2022 | - | Sozialgericht Altenburg | 24. Januar 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Nordhausen | S 10 U 1851/16 | 24.09.2020 | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | L 1 U 53/21 | 13.10.2022 | - | Sozialgericht Nordhausen | 24. Januar 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Nordhausen | S 3 R 1221/19 | 27.10.2020 | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | L 1 JVEG 550/22 | 16.12.2022 | - | Sozialgericht Nordhausen | 24. Januar 2023 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 165 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 165 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 165 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 4100, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128628 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-01-26 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-01-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 16 KR 156/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-16-kr-156-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:42:15 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:42:15 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-16-kr-156-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128625 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-01-26 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-01-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 16 BA 121/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-16-ba-121-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:42:13 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:42:13 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-16-ba-121-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128622 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-01-26 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-01-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 18 AS 884/22 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-18-as-884-22-b-er-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:42:10 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:42:10 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-18-as-884-22-b-er-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128621 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-01-26 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-01-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 18 AS 884/22 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-18-as-884-22-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:42:10 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:42:10 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-18-as-884-22-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128617 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-01-26 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-01-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 18 AS 778/22 NZB [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-18-as-778-22-nzb [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:42:08 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:42:08 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-18-as-778-22-nzb/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128611 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-01-26 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-01-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 18 AS 293/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-18-as-293-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:42:05 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:42:05 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-18-as-293-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128608 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-01-26 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-01-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 16 R 685/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-16-r-685-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:42:02 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:42:02 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-16-r-685-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128605 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-01-26 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-01-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 18 AS 1112/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-18-as-1112-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:42:00 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:42:00 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-18-as-1112-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128602 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-01-26 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-01-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 16 R 551/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-16-r-551-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:41:59 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:41:59 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-16-r-551-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128599 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-01-26 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-01-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 18 AL 97/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-18-al-97-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:41:57 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:41:57 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-18-al-97-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128594 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-01-26 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-01-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 18 AS 784/22 B PKH [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-18-as-784-22-b-pkh [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:41:54 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:41:54 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-18-as-784-22-b-pkh/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128591 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-01-26 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-01-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 18 AS 225/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-18-as-225-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:41:53 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:41:53 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-18-as-225-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128588 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-01-26 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-01-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 16 R 85/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-16-r-85-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:41:51 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:41:51 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-16-r-85-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128585 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-01-26 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-01-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 18 AS 548/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-18-as-548-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:41:49 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:41:49 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-18-as-548-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128582 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-01-26 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-01-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 18 AS 678/22 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-18-as-678-22-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:41:47 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:41:47 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-18-as-678-22-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128579 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-01-26 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-01-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 18 AL 45/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-18-al-45-21-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:41:46 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:41:46 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-18-al-45-21-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128576 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-01-26 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-01-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 18 AL 17/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-18-al-17-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:41:44 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:41:44 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-18-al-17-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87889 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-01-26 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-01-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 6 KA 11/21 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-6-ka-11-21-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:14:12 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:14:12 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-6-ka-11-21-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150248 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-01-25 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-01-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 AS 50/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-as-50-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:48:48 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:48:48 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-as-50-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130746 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-01-25 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-01-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 19 R 140/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-19-r-140-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:09:27 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:09:27 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-19-r-140-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128572 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-01-25 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-01-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 AS 1050/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-as-1050-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:41:42 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:41:42 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-as-1050-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140304 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-01-24 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-01-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 28 BA 11/21 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-28-ba-11-21-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:17:44 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:17:44 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-28-ba-11-21-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 132223 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-01-24 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-01-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 U 723/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-u-723-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:04:54 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:04:54 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-u-723-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 131960 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-01-24 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-01-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 U 53/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-u-53-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:03:09 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:03:09 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-u-53-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 131955 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-01-24 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-01-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 JVEG 550/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-jveg-550-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:03:06 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:03:06 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-jveg-550-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128628 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-01-26 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-01-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 16 KR 156/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-16-kr-156-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:42:15 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:42:15 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-16-kr-156-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 94244e1c6e6a4e9c02b99fd8d442ec06 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:a9876d14e676599777ce4cab928bdaea:0.37321000 1747946678 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.