| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Aachen | S 7 BA 26/20 ER | 18.02.2021 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 8 BA 49/21 B ER | 13.07.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 18. Januar 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Detmold | S 11 AS 526/20 | 29.11.2021 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 21 AS 188/22 | 28.10.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 18. Januar 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Detmold | S 11 AS 498/19 | 29.11.2021 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 21 AS 186/22 | 28.10.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 18. Januar 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Detmold | S 11 AS 509/18 | 29.11.2021 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 21 AS 183/22 | 28.10.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 18. Januar 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht München | S 38 KA 35/21 | 23.11.2022 | - | - | Sozialgericht München | 18. Januar 2023 | ||||
| Sozialgericht München | S 2 AS 495/21 | 22.06.2022 | - | - | Sozialgericht München | 18. Januar 2023 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Augsburg | S 2 KR 365/21 | 13.10.2022 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 KR 441/22 | - | - | Sozialgericht Augsburg | 18. Januar 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 34 AS 3166/15 | 06.08.2020 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 AS 939/20 | 06.12.2022 | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 17. Januar 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 39 U 222/13 | 04.07.2018 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 6 U 169/18 | 19.10.2022 | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 17. Januar 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Leipzig | S 22 KR 166/17 | 17.06.2019 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 9 KR 311/19 | 20.12.2022 | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 17. Januar 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 2 AL 2638/20 | 08.06.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 8 AL 2190/21 | 09.03.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 17. Januar 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 10 U 5055/16 | 08.03.2019 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 9 U 2342/19 | 15.03.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 17. Januar 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 17 R 5827/15 | 16.12.2019 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 9 R 226/20 | 15.11.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 17. Januar 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 17 R 5827/15 | 16.12.2019 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 9 R 226/20 | 15.11.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 17. Januar 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Ulm | S 13 KR 3401/19 | 15.10.2020 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 5 KR 3823/20 | 29.06.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 17. Januar 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht München | S 38 KA 5155/21 | 09.11.2022 | - | - | Sozialgericht München | 17. Januar 2023 | ||||
| Sozialgericht München | S 38 KA 121/20 | 22.11.2022 | - | - | Sozialgericht München | 17. Januar 2023 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Bayreuth | S 3 R 91/15 | 08.05.2018 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 19 R 337/18 | 06.04.2022 | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 17. Januar 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Detmold | S 4 AL 206/16 | 04.10.2017 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 9 AL 139/19 | 31.05.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | B 11 AL 32/21 R | 22.09.2022 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 16. Januar 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Duisburg | S 3 SO 382/21 WA | 26.01.2022 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 12 SO 96/22 | 15.06.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 16. Januar 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 22 SO 275/22 ER | 29.09.2022 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 12 SO 327/22 B ER | 30.11.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 16. Januar 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Heilbronn | S 13 R 944/17 | 04.04.2019 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 10 R 1414/19 | 17.02.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 13. Januar 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 11 R 4014/18 | 14.02.2019 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 7 R 1186/19 | 28.07.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 13. Januar 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 5 KA 1986/18 | 08.12.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 5 KA 324/22 | 26.10.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 13. Januar 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Reutlingen | S 6 KR 1831/19 | 30.03.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 4 KR 1289/21 | 24.06.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 13. Januar 2023 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 168 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 168 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 168 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 4175, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 148605 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-01-18 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-01-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 BA 49/21 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-ba-49-21-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:33:45 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:33:45 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-ba-49-21-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 148600 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-01-18 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-01-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 21 AS 188/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-21-as-188-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:33:42 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:33:42 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-21-as-188-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 148594 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-01-18 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-01-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 21 AS 186/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-21-as-186-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:33:38 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:33:38 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-21-as-186-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 148588 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-01-18 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-01-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 21 AS 183/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-21-as-183-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:33:35 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:33:35 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-21-as-183-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143697 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-01-18 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-01-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 38 KA 35/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-38-ka-35-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:42:38 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:42:38 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-38-ka-35-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143694 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-01-18 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-01-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 2 AS 495/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-2-as-495-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:42:36 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:42:36 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-2-as-495-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140329 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-01-18 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-01-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 2 KR 365/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-2-kr-365-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:18:06 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:18:06 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-2-kr-365-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161024 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-01-17 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-01-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 AS 939/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-as-939-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:31:23 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:31:23 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-as-939-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160992 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-01-17 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-01-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 U 169/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-u-169-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:30:43 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:30:43 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-u-169-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160988 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-01-17 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-01-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 KR 311/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-kr-311-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:30:39 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:30:39 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-kr-311-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 158259 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-01-17 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-01-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 AL 2190/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-al-2190-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:54:48 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:54:48 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-al-2190-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 158256 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-01-17 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-01-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 U 2342/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-u-2342-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:54:45 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:54:45 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-u-2342-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 158251 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-01-17 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-01-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 R 226/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-r-226-20-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:54:42 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:54:42 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-r-226-20-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 158250 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-01-17 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-01-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 R 226/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-r-226-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:54:42 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:54:42 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-r-226-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 158247 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-01-17 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-01-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KR 3823/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-kr-3823-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:54:39 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:54:39 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-kr-3823-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143691 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-01-17 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-01-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 38 KA 5155/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-38-ka-5155-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:42:35 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:42:35 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-38-ka-5155-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143687 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-01-17 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-01-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 38 KA 121/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-38-ka-121-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:42:33 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:42:33 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-38-ka-121-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130741 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-01-17 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-01-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 19 R 337/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-19-r-337-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:09:19 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:09:19 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-19-r-337-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 148583 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-01-16 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-01-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 AL 139/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-al-139-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:33:32 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:33:32 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-al-139-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 148578 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-01-16 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-01-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 12 SO 96/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-12-so-96-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:33:30 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:33:30 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-12-so-96-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 148571 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-01-16 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-01-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 12 SO 327/22 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-12-so-327-22-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:33:25 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:33:25 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-12-so-327-22-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 158243 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-01-13 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-01-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 R 1414/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-r-1414-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:54:36 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:54:36 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-r-1414-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 158238 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-01-13 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-01-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 R 1186/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-r-1186-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:54:33 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:54:33 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-r-1186-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 158233 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-01-13 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-01-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KA 324/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-ka-324-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:54:30 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:54:30 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-ka-324-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 158230 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-01-13 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-01-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 KR 1289/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-kr-1289-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:54:28 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:54:28 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-kr-1289-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 148605 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-01-18 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-01-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 BA 49/21 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-ba-49-21-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:33:45 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:33:45 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-ba-49-21-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 62a33de92c63b3742515638b67bc9fbc [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:4582fa755d2bed2260e3fde38fb5ebe5:0.29016700 1748000546 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.