| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | S 48 KR 2305/19 | 14.12.2019 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 5 KR 35/20 | 31.03.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 3 KR 8/22 BH | 05.10.2022 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 11. Januar 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | S 17 KR 2863/19 | 04.03.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 5 KR 190/20 | 31.03.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 3 KR 10/22 BH | 05.10.2022 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 11. Januar 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Münster | S 23 R 21/22 | 28.03.2022 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 3 R 292/22 | 07.09.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 5 R 56/22 BH | 07.12.2022 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 11. Januar 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 5 AL 466/17 | 20.10.2022 | - | - | Sozialgericht Dresden | 11. Januar 2023 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Augsburg | S 11 U 92/22 | 29.11.2022 | - | - | Sozialgericht Augsburg | 11. Januar 2023 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Detmold | S 35 AS 520/21 | 15.06.2022 | - | - | Sozialgericht Detmold | 11. Januar 2023 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 23 U 168/17 | 01.12.2022 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 U 16/23 | - | - | Sozialgericht Frankfurt | 11. Januar 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 23 U 35/18 | 22.11.2022 | - | - | Sozialgericht Frankfurt | 11. Januar 2023 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Chemnitz | S 36 BA 18/19 | 19.11.2019 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 9 BA 38/19 | 15.11.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 BA 1/23 R | 20.07.2023 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 10. Januar 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 42 SO 229/17 | 03.09.2019 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 SO 107/19 | 30.11.2022 | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 10. Januar 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 27 AS 1387/22 ER | 11.11.2022 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 AS 591/22 B ER | 06.01.2023 | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 10. Januar 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Ulm | S 13 SO 1282/20 | 17.09.2020 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 2 SO 811/22 ZVW | 17.11.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 10. Januar 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Heilbronn | S 2 SO 445/20 | 13.04.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 2 SO 1488/21 | 24.01.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 10. Januar 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 8 R 2293/21 | 01.03.2022 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 8 R 728/22 | 22.07.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 10. Januar 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Reutlingen | S 4 U 143/20 | 26.05.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 1 U 2094/21 | 17.03.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 10. Januar 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Konstanz | S 7 U 2083/18 | 21.05.2019 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 9 U 2066/19 | 17.05.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 10. Januar 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Reutlingen | S 4 SO 608/21 | 06.04.2022 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 2 SO 1058/22 | 30.05.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 10. Januar 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 4 R 2749/20 | 04.06.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 11 R 2125/21 | - | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 10. Januar 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Heilbronn | S 11 SO 905/17 | 02.04.2019 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 7 SO 1635/19 | 17.03.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 10. Januar 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Heilbronn | S 3 U 605/19 | 17.11.2020 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 10 U 508/21 | 24.03.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 10. Januar 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 12 R 275/18 | 17.06.2020 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 10 R 2292/20 | 11.03.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 10. Januar 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Heilbronn | S 15 KR 3126/19 | 14.12.2020 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 5 KR 284/21 | 27.07.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 10. Januar 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Augsburg | S 18 U 205/21 | 17.11.2022 | - | - | Sozialgericht Augsburg | 10. Januar 2023 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Augsburg | S 18 U 65/22 | 17.11.2022 | - | - | Sozialgericht Augsburg | 10. Januar 2023 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Köln | S 31 KR 1189/20 | 16.02.2021 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 10 KR 214/21 | 15.09.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | B 3 KR 40/21 B | 10.11.2022 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 9. Januar 2023 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 170 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 170 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 170 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 4225, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 148519 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-01-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-01-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KR 35/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-kr-35-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:32:56 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:32:56 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-kr-35-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 148514 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-01-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-01-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KR 190/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-kr-190-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:32:53 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:32:53 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-kr-190-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 148509 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-01-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-01-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 R 292/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-r-292-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:32:51 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:32:51 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-r-292-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143028 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-01-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-01-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 5 AL 466/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-5-al-466-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:36:26 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:36:26 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-5-al-466-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140327 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-01-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-01-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 11 U 92/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-11-u-92-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:18:04 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:18:04 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-11-u-92-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140302 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-01-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-01-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 35 AS 520/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-35-as-520-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:17:41 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:17:41 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-35-as-520-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 136974 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-01-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-01-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 23 U 168/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-23-u-168-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:42:09 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:42:09 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-23-u-168-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 136970 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-01-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-01-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 23 U 35/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-23-u-35-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:42:07 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:42:07 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-23-u-35-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160983 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-01-10 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-01-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 BA 38/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-ba-38-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:30:35 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:30:35 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-ba-38-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160980 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-01-10 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-01-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 SO 107/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-so-107-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:30:32 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:30:32 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-so-107-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160974 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-01-10 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-01-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 AS 591/22 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-as-591-22-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:30:26 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:30:26 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-as-591-22-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 158192 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-01-10 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-01-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 SO 811/22 ZVW [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-so-811-22-zvw [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:54:01 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:54:01 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-so-811-22-zvw/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 158188 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-01-10 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-01-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 SO 1488/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-so-1488-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:53:58 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:53:58 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-so-1488-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 158184 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-01-10 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-01-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 R 728/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-r-728-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:53:56 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:53:56 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-r-728-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 158180 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-01-10 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-01-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 U 2094/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-u-2094-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:53:54 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:53:54 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-u-2094-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 158176 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-01-10 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-01-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 U 2066/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-u-2066-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:53:50 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:53:50 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-u-2066-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 158172 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-01-10 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-01-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 SO 1058/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-so-1058-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:53:47 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:53:47 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-so-1058-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 158168 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-01-10 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-01-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 R 2125/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-r-2125-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:53:45 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:53:45 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-r-2125-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 158164 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-01-10 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-01-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 SO 1635/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-so-1635-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:53:43 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:53:43 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-so-1635-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 158160 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-01-10 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-01-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 U 508/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-u-508-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:53:41 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:53:41 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-u-508-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 158156 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-01-10 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-01-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 R 2292/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-r-2292-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:53:37 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:53:37 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-r-2292-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 158152 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-01-10 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-01-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KR 284/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-kr-284-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:53:35 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:53:35 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-kr-284-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140324 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-01-10 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-01-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 18 U 205/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-18-u-205-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:18:01 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:18:01 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-18-u-205-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140322 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-01-10 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-01-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 18 U 65/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-18-u-65-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:18:00 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:18:00 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-18-u-65-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 148504 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-01-09 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-01-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 KR 214/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-kr-214-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:32:48 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:32:48 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-kr-214-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 148519 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-01-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-01-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KR 35/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-kr-35-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:32:56 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:32:56 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-kr-35-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 96d59b56fe798176760715e46509a01f [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:b574baa5ba170febc0c5c83cdf75b0ff:0.91277900 1748026838 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.