| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | S 2 SO 77/22 ER | 11.05.2022 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 9 SO 191/22 B ER | 15.09.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 8 SO 42/22 AR | 05.12.2022 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 9. Januar 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Detmold | S 35 AS 441/22 ER | 01.07.2022 | - | - | Sozialgericht Detmold | 9. Januar 2023 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Detmold | S 35 SO 228/20 | 04.04.2022 | - | - | Sozialgericht Detmold | 9. Januar 2023 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 13 U 163/21 | 10.10.2022 | - | - | Sozialgericht Frankfurt | 9. Januar 2023 | ||||
| - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 1 KR 438/20 KL ZVW | 09.11.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 3 KR 22/22 R | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 9. Januar 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 34 R 173/19 ZV | 01.06.2022 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 R 297/22 ZV | 15.12.2022 | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 5. Januar 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 34 R 157/19 ZV - S 42 RS 1018/14 | 21.04.2022 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 R 240/22 ZV | 15.12.2022 | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 5. Januar 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Leipzig | S 11 R 215/21 ZV | 22.02.2022 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 R 117/22 ZV | 15.12.2022 | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 5. Januar 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Leipzig | S 8 KR 2/16 | 22.10.2019 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 1 KR 340/19 | 13.07.2022 | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 5. Januar 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Leipzig | S 22 KR 644/15 | 17.06.2019 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 1 KR 240/19 B | 07.11.2022 | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 5. Januar 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Leipzig | S 9 AS 524/17 | 25.04.2019 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 AS 694/19 | 15.12.2022 | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 5. Januar 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Chemnitz | S 32 SB 90/18 | 17.01.2019 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 SB 21/19 | 21.06.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 9 SB 43/22 B | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 5. Januar 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 47 KR 631/11 | 24.09.2018 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 9 BA 49/18 | 14.07.2022 | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 5. Januar 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Leipzig | S 3 KR 296/14 | 28.03.2018 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 1 KR 228/18 | 13.07.2022 | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 5. Januar 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Leipzig | S 8 KR 274/16 | 12.01.2016 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 9 KR 83/16 | 08.09.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 KR 46/22 B | 08.11.2023 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 5. Januar 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Leipzig | S 8 KR 274/16 | 12.01.2016 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 9 KR 83/16 | 08.09.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 KR 46/22 B | 08.11.2023 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 5. Januar 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Leipzig | S 8 KR 552/13 | 30.08.2016 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 1 KR 329/21 | 29.06.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 103/22 B | 29.02.2024 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 5. Januar 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Duisburg | S 3 SO 94/22 | 23.11.2022 | - | - | Sozialgericht Duisburg | 5. Januar 2023 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Nürnberg | S 18 KR 705/21 | 09.11.2022 | - | - | Sozialgericht Nürnberg | 5. Januar 2023 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Nürnberg | S 18 KR 704/21 | 09.11.2022 | - | - | Sozialgericht Nürnberg | 5. Januar 2023 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 83 KA 141/22 ER | 06.12.2022 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 7 KA 29/22 B ER | - | - | Sozialgericht Berlin | 4. Januar 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 83 KA 141/22 ER | 06.12.2022 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 7 KA 29/22 B ER | - | - | Sozialgericht Berlin | 4. Januar 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 8 AL 2955/18 | 26.08.2019 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 8 AL 3398/19 | 23.07.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | B 11 AL 34/21 R | 22.09.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | 4. Januar 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 123 AS 4416/21 | 08.12.2022 | - | - | Sozialgericht Berlin | 3. Januar 2023 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | S 37 U 400/16 | 09.05.2019 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 15 U 439/19 | 27.10.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 2/23 R | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 3. Januar 2023 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 171 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 171 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 171 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 4250, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 148499 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-01-09 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-01-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 SO 191/22 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-so-191-22-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:32:45 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:32:45 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-so-191-22-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140300 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-01-09 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-01-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 35 AS 441/22 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-35-as-441-22-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:17:40 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:17:40 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-35-as-441-22-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140299 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-01-09 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-01-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 35 SO 228/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-35-so-228-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:17:38 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:17:38 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-35-so-228-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 136961 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-01-09 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-01-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 13 U 163/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-13-u-163-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:42:05 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:42:05 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-13-u-163-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128423 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-01-09 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-01-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 438/20 KL ZVW [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-438-20-kl-zvw [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:39:42 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:39:42 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-438-20-kl-zvw/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160971 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-01-05 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-01-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 R 297/22 ZV [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-r-297-22-zv [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:30:23 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:30:23 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-r-297-22-zv/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160958 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-01-05 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-01-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 R 240/22 ZV [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-r-240-22-zv [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:30:08 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:30:08 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-r-240-22-zv/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160916 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-01-05 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-01-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 R 117/22 ZV [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-r-117-22-zv [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:29:18 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:29:18 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-r-117-22-zv/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160909 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-01-05 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-01-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 340/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-340-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:29:10 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:29:10 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-340-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160904 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-01-05 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-01-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 240/19 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-240-19-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:29:06 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:29:06 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-240-19-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160901 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-01-05 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-01-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 AS 694/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-as-694-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:29:02 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:29:02 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-as-694-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160897 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-01-05 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-01-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 SB 21/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-sb-21-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:28:58 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:28:58 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-sb-21-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160893 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-01-05 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-01-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 BA 49/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-ba-49-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:28:54 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:28:54 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-ba-49-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160882 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-01-05 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-01-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 228/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-228-18-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:28:42 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:28:42 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-228-18-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160878 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-01-05 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-01-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 KR 83/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-kr-83-16-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:28:37 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:28:37 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-kr-83-16-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160877 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-01-05 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-01-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 KR 83/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-kr-83-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:28:37 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:28:37 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-kr-83-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160874 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-01-05 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-01-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 329/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-329-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:28:33 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:28:33 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-329-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143442 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-01-05 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-01-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 3 SO 94/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-3-so-94-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:39:33 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:39:33 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-3-so-94-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134706 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-01-05 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-01-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 18 KR 705/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-18-kr-705-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:23:58 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:23:58 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-18-kr-705-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134702 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-01-05 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-01-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 18 KR 704/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-18-kr-704-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:23:56 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:23:56 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-18-kr-704-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150231 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-01-04 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-01-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 83 KA 141/22 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-83-ka-141-22-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:48:37 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:48:37 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-83-ka-141-22-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150230 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-01-04 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-01-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 83 KA 141/22 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-83-ka-141-22-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:48:37 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:48:37 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-83-ka-141-22-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87884 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-01-04 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-01-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 11 AL 34/21 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-11-al-34-21-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:13:58 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:13:58 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-11-al-34-21-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150227 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-01-03 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-01-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 123 AS 4416/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-123-as-4416-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:48:34 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:48:34 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-123-as-4416-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 148494 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-01-03 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-01-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 15 U 439/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-15-u-439-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:32:43 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:32:43 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-15-u-439-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 148499 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-01-09 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-01-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 SO 191/22 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-so-191-22-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:32:45 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:32:45 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-so-191-22-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => ae8a6bf6729a13ef757f0bb9e72e369f [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:92a70dc7e9b608bd8b45119e3698870f:0.37763400 1748026754 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.