| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Köln | S 4 BA 37/22 ER | 18.05.2022 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 8 BA 77/22 B ER | 05.09.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 3. Januar 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Detmold | S 28 BA 11/21 ER | 22.03.2021 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 8 BA 54/21 B ER | 07.07.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 3. Januar 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 17 U 913/17 | 02.03.2021 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 17 U 131/21 | 21.03.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 44/22 B | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 3. Januar 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 40 AS 1515/18 | 05.07.2022 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 2 AS 1144/22 NZB | 15.12.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 3. Januar 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Darmstadt | S 8 KR 285/20 | 04.10.2022 | - | - | Sozialgericht Darmstadt | 3. Januar 2023 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | S 12 SO 140/18 | 15.06.2021 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 9 SO 281/21 | 08.09.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 8 SO 21/22 R | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 2. Januar 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | S 12 SO 140/18 | 15.06.2021 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 9 SO 281/21 | 08.09.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 8 SO 21/22 R | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 2. Januar 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 2 BA 219/18 ER | 26.05.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 8 BA 83/20 B ER | 14.04.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 2. Januar 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Köln | S 2 R 1713/17 WA | 11.05.2022 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 8 BA 84/22 B | 22.08.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 2. Januar 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 11 KR 624/19 | 04.11.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 5 KR 5/21 | 05.05.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 KR 22/22 B | 01.11.2022 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 2. Januar 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | S 17 KR 2864/19 | 04.03.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 5 KR 191/20 | 31.03.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 39/22 BH | 14.09.2022 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 2. Januar 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Duisburg | S 29 U 39/13 | 31.08.2018 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 17 U 566/18 | 23.05.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 75/22 B | 29.11.2022 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 2. Januar 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Potsdam | S 1 KA 20/17 | 20.11.2019 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 7 KA 4/20 | 21.09.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 2. Januar 2023 | ||
| Sozialgericht Osnabrück | S 3 KR 355/17 | 09.10.2019 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 4 KR 490/19 | 18.11.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 28/21 R | 10.11.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | 2. Januar 2023 |
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 22 AS 468/21 | 08.04.2022 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 13 AS 1610/22 | 22.11.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 30. Dezember 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Mannheim | S 4 KR 1815/21 | 23.03.2022 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 11 KR 1253/22 | 29.11.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 29. Dezember 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Heilbronn | S 9 BA 2810/20 | 01.09.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | B 11 BA 3292/21 | 29.11.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 29. Dezember 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Ulm | S 5 KR 3039/20 | 25.03.2022 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 11 KR 3272/22 | 29.11.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 29. Dezember 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 11 SO 612/22 | 13.05.2022 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 7 SO 1522/22 | 17.11.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 29. Dezember 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Marburg | S 17 KA 12/18 und S 17 KA 13/18 | 12.10.2022 | - | - | Sozialgericht Marburg | 29. Dezember 2022 | ||||
| Sozialgericht München | S 44 KR 2075/17 | 26.11.2019 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 12 KR 685/19 | 16.02.2022 | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 29. Dezember 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Augsburg | S 3 KR 397/21 | 03.05.2022 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 12 KR 251/22 | 10.08.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 82/22 B | 22.11.2022 | Sozialgericht Augsburg | 28. Dezember 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Speyer | S 12 VJ 2/14 | 26.03.2018 | Landessozialgericht Rheinland-Pfalz | L 4 VJ 1/18 | 12.05.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Rheinland-Pfalz | 28. Dezember 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Gießen | S 18 AY 23/21 ER | 06.07.2021 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 AY 26/21 B ER | 20.09.2021 | - | Sozialgericht Gießen | 28. Dezember 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Gießen | S 18 AY 23/21 ER | 06.07.2021 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 AY 26/21 B ER | 20.09.2021 | - | Sozialgericht Gießen | 28. Dezember 2022 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 172 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 172 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 172 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 4275, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 148475 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-01-03 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-01-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 BA 77/22 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-ba-77-22-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:32:31 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:32:31 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-ba-77-22-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 148469 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-01-03 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-01-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 BA 54/21 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-ba-54-21-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:32:27 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:32:27 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-ba-54-21-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 148463 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-01-03 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-01-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 17 U 131/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-17-u-131-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:32:24 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:32:24 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-17-u-131-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 148458 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-01-03 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-01-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 AS 1144/22 NZB [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-as-1144-22-nzb [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:32:22 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:32:22 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-as-1144-22-nzb/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 136839 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-01-03 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-01-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 8 KR 285/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-8-kr-285-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:41:19 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:41:19 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-8-kr-285-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 148451 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-01-02 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-01-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 SO 281/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-so-281-21-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:32:18 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:32:18 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-so-281-21-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 148450 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-01-02 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-01-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 SO 281/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-so-281-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:32:18 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:32:18 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-so-281-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 148445 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-01-02 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-01-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 BA 83/20 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-ba-83-20-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:32:15 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:32:15 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-ba-83-20-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 148440 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-01-02 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-01-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 BA 84/22 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-ba-84-22-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:32:12 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:32:12 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-ba-84-22-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 148435 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-01-02 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-01-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KR 5/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-kr-5-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:32:09 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:32:09 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-kr-5-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 148430 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-01-02 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-01-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KR 191/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-kr-191-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:32:07 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:32:07 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-kr-191-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 148424 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-01-02 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-01-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 17 U 566/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-17-u-566-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:32:03 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:32:03 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-17-u-566-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128416 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-01-02 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-01-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 KA 4/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-ka-4-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:39:37 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:39:37 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-ka-4-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87883 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-01-02 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-01-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 1 KR 28/21 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-1-kr-28-21-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:13:54 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:13:54 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-1-kr-28-21-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 158148 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-12-30 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-12-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 13 AS 1610/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-13-as-1610-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:53:32 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:53:32 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-13-as-1610-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 158142 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-12-29 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-12-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 KR 1253/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-kr-1253-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:53:28 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:53:28 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-kr-1253-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 158138 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-12-29 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-12-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 11 BA 3292/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-11-ba-3292-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:53:25 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:53:25 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-11-ba-3292-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 158134 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-12-29 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-12-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 KR 3272/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-kr-3272-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:53:23 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:53:23 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-kr-3272-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 158130 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-12-29 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-12-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 SO 1522/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-so-1522-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:53:20 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:53:20 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-so-1522-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149792 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-12-29 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-12-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 17 KA 12/18 und S 17 KA 13/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-17-ka-12-18-und-s-17-ka-13-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:44:32 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:44:32 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-17-ka-12-18-und-s-17-ka-13-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130739 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-12-29 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-12-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 12 KR 685/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-12-kr-685-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:09:16 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:09:16 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-12-kr-685-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140321 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-12-28 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-12-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 3 KR 397/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-3-kr-397-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:17:58 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:17:58 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-3-kr-397-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137531 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-12-28 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-12-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => Zur Anerkennung eines Guillain-Barré-Syndroms (GBS) als Impfschaden nach einer sog. Schweinegrippeimpfung im Jahr 2009 (L 4 VJ 1/18) [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => zur-anerkennung-eines-guillain-barre-syndroms-gbs-als-impfschaden-nach-einer-sog-schweinegrippeimpfung-im-jahr-2009-l-4-vj-1-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:46:09 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:46:09 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/zur-anerkennung-eines-guillain-barre-syndroms-gbs-als-impfschaden-nach-einer-sog-schweinegrippeimpfung-im-jahr-2009-l-4-vj-1-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134951 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-12-28 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-12-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 18 AY 23/21 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-18-ay-23-21-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:27:24 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:27:24 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-18-ay-23-21-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134950 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-12-28 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-12-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 AY 26/21 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-ay-26-21-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:27:22 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:27:22 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-ay-26-21-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 148475 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2023-01-03 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2023-01-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 BA 77/22 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-ba-77-22-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:32:31 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:32:31 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-ba-77-22-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => d980b5241aba1712fa615ac452610a35 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:57fe27cfeaed4b0e848cda244c051b5c:0.67778000 1748107074 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.