| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht München | S 28 KA 306/21 | 14.11.2022 | - | - | Sozialgericht München | 16. Dezember 2022 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 15 AL 168/22 ER | 01.09.2022 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 AL 67/22 B ER | 07.11.2022 | - | Sozialgericht Frankfurt | 16. Dezember 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Altenburg | S 30 AS 1503/21 | 05.10.2022 | - | - | Sozialgericht Altenburg | 16. Dezember 2022 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Nordhausen | S 12 AS 1439/20 | 15.11.2022 | - | - | Sozialgericht Nordhausen | 16. Dezember 2022 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Heilbronn | S 11 AS 1357/21 | 08.09.2022 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 3 AS 2890/22 NZB | 25.11.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 15. Dezember 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Darmstadt | S 13 KR 200/17 | 05.07.2021 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 1 KR 378/21 | 17.11.2022 | - | Sozialgericht Darmstadt | 15. Dezember 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 48 KR 2750/16 | 22.03.2018 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 1 KR 46/18 | 25.02.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 24/21 R | 18.08.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | 15. Dezember 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Speyer | S 20 KR 492/17 | 23.04.2018 | Landessozialgericht Rheinland-Pfalz | L 5 KR 161/18 | 18.02.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 13/21 R | 18.08.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | 15. Dezember 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Duisburg | S 27 KR 2760/18 | 17.11.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 5 KR 903/20 | 27.10.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 38/22 R | 11.05.2023 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 14. Dezember 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 40 KR 5127/18 | 16.10.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 5 KR 752/20 | 15.11.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 42/22 R | 11.05.2023 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 14. Dezember 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 3 AS 1456/22 | 08.12.2022 | - | - | Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | 14. Dezember 2022 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 184 SO 102/20 | 30.09.2020 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 15 SO 243/20 | 21.09.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 8 SO 19/22 R | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 14. Dezember 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 16 AS 1321/20 | 20.09.2022 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 AS 421/22 | - | - | Sozialgericht Frankfurt | 13. Dezember 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Wiesbaden | S 14 SO 19/15 | 12.09.2018 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 SO 184/20 | 28.09.2022 | - | Sozialgericht Wiesbaden | 13. Dezember 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Heilbronn | S 12 KR 3262/19 | 30.04.2020 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 11 KR 1645/20 | 08.11.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 9. Dezember 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 16 KR 1460/22 | 02.08.2022 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 11 KR 2402/22 NZB | 26.10.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 9. Dezember 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Heilbronn | S 4 U 1658/21 | 14.02.2022 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 10 U 799/22 | 20.10.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 9. Dezember 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Ulm | S 2U 1539/18 | 15.10.2020 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 10 U 3619/20 | 20.10.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 9. Dezember 2022 | ||
| - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 10 KO 2511/22 | 26.10.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 9. Dezember 2022 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Lübeck | S 47 AL 110/17 | 24.06.2020 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 AL 33/20 | 18.11.2022 | - | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | 9. Dezember 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 7 SO 1434/20 | 25.09.2020 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 7 SO 3439/20 | 25.03.2021 | - | Sozialgericht Freiburg | 9. Dezember 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 7 SO 1522/18 | 23.07.2018 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 7 SO 3313/18 | 09.07.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 8 SO 14/20 R | 16.02.2022 | Sozialgericht Freiburg | 9. Dezember 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Nordhausen | 13 AS 388/20 | 28.09.2020 | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | L 1 SV 1119/20 B | 17.11.2022 | - | Sozialgericht Nordhausen | 9. Dezember 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Nordhausen | 13 AS 388/20 | 28.09.2020 | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | L 1 SV 1119/20 B | 17.11.2022 | - | Sozialgericht Nordhausen | 9. Dezember 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Detmold | S 35 AS 619/22 | 08.11.2022 | - | - | Sozialgericht Detmold | 8. Dezember 2022 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 174 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 174 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 174 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 4325, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143680 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-12-16 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-12-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 28 KA 306/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-28-ka-306-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:42:27 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:42:27 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-28-ka-306-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 136956 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-12-16 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-12-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 15 AL 168/22 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-15-al-168-22-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:42:03 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:42:03 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-15-al-168-22-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 132218 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-12-16 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-12-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 30 AS 1503/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-30-as-1503-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:04:52 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:04:52 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-30-as-1503-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 131915 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-12-16 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-12-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 13 AS 1439/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-13-as-1439-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:02:48 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:02:48 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-13-as-1439-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 158110 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-12-15 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-12-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 AS 2890/22 NZB [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-as-2890-22-nzb [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:53:08 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:53:08 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-as-2890-22-nzb/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 136834 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-12-15 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-12-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 378/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-378-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:41:18 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:41:18 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-378-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87882 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-12-15 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-12-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 1 KR 24/21 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-1-kr-24-21-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:13:53 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:13:53 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-1-kr-24-21-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87881 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-12-15 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-12-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 1 KR 13/21 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-1-kr-13-21-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:13:51 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:13:51 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-1-kr-13-21-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 148310 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-12-14 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-12-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KR 903/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-kr-903-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:30:59 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:30:59 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-kr-903-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 148305 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-12-14 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-12-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KR 752/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-kr-752-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:30:57 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:30:57 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-kr-752-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140090 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-12-14 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-12-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 3 AS 1456/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-3-as-1456-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:14:49 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:14:49 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-3-as-1456-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128391 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-12-14 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-12-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 15 SO 243/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-15-so-243-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:39:17 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:39:17 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-15-so-243-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 136952 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-12-13 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-12-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 16 AS 1321/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-16-as-1321-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:42:02 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:42:02 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-16-as-1321-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134689 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-12-13 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-12-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 SO 184/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-so-184-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:23:52 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:23:52 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-so-184-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 158106 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-12-09 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-12-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 KR 1645/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-kr-1645-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:53:06 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:53:06 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-kr-1645-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 158102 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-12-09 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-12-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 KR 2402/22 NZB [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-kr-2402-22-nzb [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:53:03 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:53:03 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-kr-2402-22-nzb/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 158098 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-12-09 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-12-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 U 799/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-u-799-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:53:00 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:53:00 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-u-799-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 158093 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-12-09 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-12-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 U 3619/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-u-3619-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:52:57 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:52:57 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-u-3619-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 158088 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-12-09 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-12-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 KO 2511/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-ko-2511-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:52:54 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:52:54 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-ko-2511-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150431 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-12-09 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-12-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 AL 33/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-al-33-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:50:52 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:50:52 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-al-33-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 133193 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-12-09 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-12-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 7 SO 1434/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-7-so-1434-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:12:02 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:12:02 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-7-so-1434-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 133185 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-12-09 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-12-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 7 SO 1522/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-7-so-1522-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:11:59 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:11:59 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-7-so-1522-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 131909 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-12-09 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-12-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 SV 1119/20 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-sv-1119-20-b-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:02:45 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:02:45 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-sv-1119-20-b-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 131908 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-12-09 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-12-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 SV 1119/20 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-sv-1119-20-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:02:45 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:02:45 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-sv-1119-20-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140296 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-12-08 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-12-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 35 AS 619/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-35-as-619-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:17:35 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:17:35 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-35-as-619-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143680 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-12-16 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-12-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 28 KA 306/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-28-ka-306-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:42:27 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:42:27 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-28-ka-306-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => bb835864fec97ea71ea135dbf5d2144f [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:e9295f53f91120fa18208e31ba7e77b4:0.03557100 1748131874 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.