Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sozialgericht Altenburg | S 33 U 154/16 | 26.06.2018 | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | L 1 U 908/18 | 22.09.2022 | - | Sozialgericht Altenburg | 8. Dezember 2022 | ||
Sozialgericht München | S 9 U 484/20 | 18.01.2021 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 U 56/21 | 26.10.2022 | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 8. Dezember 2022 | ||
Sozialgericht Landshut | S 11 AS 261/16 | 27.09.2017 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 AS 755/17 | 12.12.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 7/14 AS 75/20 R | 13.07.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | 8. Dezember 2022 |
Sozialgericht Marburg | S 12 KA 136/21 | 15.02.2022 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 KA 38/22 | 27.07.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 6 KA 20/22 R | - | Sozialgericht Marburg | 7. Dezember 2022 |
Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 9 SO 2322/21 | 22.03.2022 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 2 SO 1183/22 | 09.11.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 6. Dezember 2022 | ||
Sozialgericht Marburg | S 12 KA 136/21 | 15.02.2022 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 KA 38/22 | 27.07.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 6 KA 20/22 R | 25.10.2023 | Sozialgericht Marburg | 6. Dezember 2022 |
Sozialgericht Marburg | S 18 KA 464/20 | 28.01.2022 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 KA 20/22 | 27.07.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 6 KA 19/22 R | - | Sozialgericht Marburg | 6. Dezember 2022 |
Sozialgericht Marburg | S 18 KA 464/20 | 28.01.2022 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 KA 20/22 | 27.07.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 6 KA 19/22 R | - | Sozialgericht Marburg | 6. Dezember 2022 |
Sozialgericht Marburg | S 12 KA 304/19 | 08.06.2020 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 KA 36/21 | 27.07.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 6 KA 16/22 R | 25.10.2023 | Sozialgericht Marburg | 6. Dezember 2022 |
Sozialgericht Köln | S 41 SF 103/22 E | 23.06.2022 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 9 SO 241/22 B | 02.11.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 6. Dezember 2022 | ||
Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | S 33 AS 2946/18 | 17.11.2021 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 19 AS 1826/21 | 27.10.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 6. Dezember 2022 | ||
Sozialgericht Münster | S 23 R 407/19 | 12.11.2019 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 14 R 28/20 | 19.08.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 13 R 5/21 C | 10.03.2021 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 6. Dezember 2022 |
Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 24 R 684/18 | 15.10.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 4 R 1010/20 | 14.01.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 R 1/22 B | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 6. Dezember 2022 |
Sozialgericht Gießen | S 5 BA 26/21 (PKH) | 03.01.2022 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 1 BA 27/22 B | 29.11.2022 | - | Sozialgericht Gießen | 6. Dezember 2022 | ||
Sozialgericht Leipzig | S 15 U 72/16 | 13.12.2017 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 6 U 13/18 | 04.03.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 16/20 R | 28.06.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | 6. Dezember 2022 |
Sozialgericht Speyer | S 17 KR 689/16 | 05.12.2019 | Landessozialgericht Rheinland-Pfalz | L 5 KR 22/20 | 01.07.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 30/21 R | 18.08.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | 6. Dezember 2022 |
Sozialgericht Duisburg | S 17 KR 1152/17 WA | 13.11.2017 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 11 KR 830/17 | 27.11.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 29/21 R | 18.08.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | 6. Dezember 2022 |
Sozialgericht Berlin | S 28 KR 2551/13 | 07.10.2015 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 9 KR 534/15 | 22.05.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 KR 7/20 R | 29.03.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | 6. Dezember 2022 |
Sozialgericht Landshut | S 6 KR 391/16 | 05.09.2018 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 KR 460/18 | 17.12.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 KR 5/20 R | 28.06.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | 6. Dezember 2022 |
Sozialgericht Darmstadt | S 11 AL 229/17 | 18.04.2019 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 AL 64/19 | 19.02.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | B 11 AL 8/21 R | 25.05.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | 6. Dezember 2022 |
Sozialgericht Köln | S 28 VG 39/10 | 19.01.2016 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 13 VG 55/16 | 26.02.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | B 9 V 4/21 R | 25.08.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | 6. Dezember 2022 |
Sozialgericht Bremen | S 22 AS 1156/16 | 21.08.2017 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 15 AS 220/17 | 10.09.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 7/14 AS 52/21 R | 13.07.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | 6. Dezember 2022 |
Sozialgericht München | S 20 KA 1091/13 | 21.05.2019 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 12 KA 37/19 | 07.10.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 6 KA 10/21 R | 07.09.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | 6. Dezember 2022 |
Sozialgericht Dresden | S 22 R 989/16 | 03.07.2019 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 R 475/19 | 03.11.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 5 R 41/21 R | 06.07.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | 6. Dezember 2022 |
Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 12 SO 3577/18 | 19.01.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 7 SO 619/21 | 17.11.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 5. Dezember 2022 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 175 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 175 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 175 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 4350, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 132212 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-12-08 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-12-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 U 908/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-u-908-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:04:49 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:04:49 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-u-908-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130736 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-12-08 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-12-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 U 56/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-u-56-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:09:11 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:09:11 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-u-56-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87880 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-12-08 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-12-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 7/14 AS 75/20 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-7-14-as-75-20-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:13:45 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:13:45 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-7-14-as-75-20-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149787 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-12-07 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-12-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 12 KA 136/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-12-ka-136-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:44:29 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:44:29 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-12-ka-136-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 158083 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-12-06 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-12-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 SO 1183/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-so-1183-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:52:51 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:52:51 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-so-1183-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149782 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-12-06 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-12-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 KA 38/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-ka-38-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:44:26 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:44:26 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-ka-38-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149777 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-12-06 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-12-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 KA 20/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-ka-20-22-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:44:23 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:44:23 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-ka-20-22-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149776 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-12-06 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-12-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 KA 20/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-ka-20-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:44:23 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:44:23 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-ka-20-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149770 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-12-06 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-12-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 KA 36/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-ka-36-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:44:20 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:44:20 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-ka-36-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 148300 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-12-06 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-12-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 SO 241/22 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-so-241-22-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:30:54 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:30:54 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-so-241-22-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 148295 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-12-06 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-12-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 19 AS 1826/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-19-as-1826-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:30:51 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:30:51 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-19-as-1826-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 148287 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-12-06 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-12-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 14 R 28/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-14-r-28-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:30:47 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:30:47 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-14-r-28-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 148282 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-12-06 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-12-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 R 1010/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-r-1010-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:30:44 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:30:44 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-r-1010-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134949 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-12-06 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-12-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 5 BA 26/21 (PKH) [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-5-ba-26-21-pkh [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:27:21 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:27:21 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-5-ba-26-21-pkh/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87879 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-12-06 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-12-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 2 U 16/20 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-2-u-16-20-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:13:44 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:13:44 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-2-u-16-20-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87878 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-12-06 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-12-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 1 KR 30/21 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-1-kr-30-21-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:13:40 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:13:40 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-1-kr-30-21-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87877 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-12-06 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-12-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 1 KR 29/21 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-1-kr-29-21-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:13:38 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:13:38 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-1-kr-29-21-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87876 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-12-06 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-12-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 12 KR 7/20 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-12-kr-7-20-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:13:34 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:13:34 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-12-kr-7-20-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87875 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-12-06 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-12-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 12 KR 5/20 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-12-kr-5-20-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:13:31 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:13:31 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-12-kr-5-20-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87874 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-12-06 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-12-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 11 AL 8/21 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-11-al-8-21-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:13:26 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:13:26 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-11-al-8-21-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87873 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-12-06 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-12-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 9 V 4/21 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-9-v-4-21-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:13:22 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:13:22 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-9-v-4-21-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87872 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-12-06 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-12-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 7/14 AS 52/21 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-7-14-as-52-21-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:13:21 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:13:21 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-7-14-as-52-21-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87871 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-12-06 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-12-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 6 KA 10/21 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-6-ka-10-21-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:13:19 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:13:19 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-6-ka-10-21-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87870 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-12-06 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-12-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 5 R 41/21 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-5-r-41-21-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:13:17 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:13:17 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-5-r-41-21-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 158079 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-12-05 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-12-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 SO 619/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-so-619-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:52:47 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:52:47 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-so-619-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 132212 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-12-08 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-12-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 U 908/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-u-908-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:04:49 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:04:49 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-u-908-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 0c750583177253b40c4229d42129e80f [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:e1cfa01f9e732e9a37c1c6d309f89bb3:0.63815500 1748131807 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.