| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Marburg | S 18 KA 266/20 | 28.01.2022 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 KA 19/22 | 27.07.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 6 KA 18/22 R | - | Sozialgericht Marburg | 5. Dezember 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Hannover | S 24 KA 164/18 | 09.12.2020 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 3 KA 1/21 | 28.09.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 5. Dezember 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Hannover | S 20 KA 311/16 | 24.04.2019 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 3 KA 30/19 | 28.09.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 5. Dezember 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Hannover | S 10 KR 305/22 ER | 06.05.2022 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 4 KR 230/22 B ER | 29.09.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 5. Dezember 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Hannover | S 10 KR 372/22 ER | 27.07.2022 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 4 KR 373/22 B ER | 14.10.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 5. Dezember 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Stade | S 31 R 237/18 | 02.09.2021 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 2 R 235/21 | 07.09.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 5. Dezember 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Hannover | S 67 KR 378/19 | 01.07.2021 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 16 KR 336/21 | 14.10.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 5. Dezember 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Stade | S 7 U 147/15 | 21.06.2018 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 14 U 171/18 | 18.02.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 5. Dezember 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Osnabrück | S 3 KR 183/22 ER | 07.09.2022 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 16 KR 433/22 B ER | 28.10.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 5. Dezember 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Hannover | S 93 KR 805/20 | 28.04.2021 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 16 KR 256/21 | 14.10.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 5. Dezember 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Gießen | S 5 BA 26/21 | 03.01.2022 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 1 BA 27/22 B | 29.11.2022 | - | Sozialgericht Gießen | 5. Dezember 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 9 SO 3201/22 ER | 05.12.2022 | - | - | Sozialgericht Freiburg | 5. Dezember 2022 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 13 AS 2141/21 | 06.04.2022 | - | - | Sozialgericht Freiburg | 5. Dezember 2022 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 15 AL 1855/20 | 25.03.2022 | - | - | Sozialgericht Freiburg | 5. Dezember 2022 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Hannover | S 20 KA 85/20 | 14.09.2022 | - | - | Sozialgericht Hannover | 5. Dezember 2022 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Hannover | S 20 KA 56/20 | 14.09.2022 | - | - | Sozialgericht Hannover | 5. Dezember 2022 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Hannover | S 24 KA 164/20 | 14.09.2022 | - | - | Sozialgericht Hannover | 5. Dezember 2022 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Hannover | S 20 KA 187/20 | 12.10.2022 | - | - | Sozialgericht Hannover | 5. Dezember 2022 | ||||
| Sozialgericht München | S 8 AS 1311/20 | 30.06.2022 | - | - | Sozialgericht München | 4. Dezember 2022 | ||||
| Sozialgericht München | S 8 AS 227/20 | 30.06.2022 | - | - | Sozialgericht München | 4. Dezember 2022 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 4 KA 6791/17 | 21.10.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 5 KA 3703/21 | 26.10.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 2. Dezember 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 24 KA 3320/20 | 23.11.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 5 KA 3909/21 | 26.10.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 2. Dezember 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Reutlingen | S 1 KR 3340/ 18 | 08.01.2020 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 5 KR 522/22 | 27.07.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 2. Dezember 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Reutlingen | S 10 KR 2795/19 | 16.04.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 5 KR 1980/21 | 27.07.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 2. Dezember 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 23 KR 2931/20 | 20.07.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 5 KR 2686/21 | 27.07.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 2. Dezember 2022 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 176 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 176 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 176 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 4375, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149764 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-12-05 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-12-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 KA 19/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-ka-19-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:44:16 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:44:16 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-ka-19-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 138533 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-12-05 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-12-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 KA 1/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-ka-1-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:03:22 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:03:22 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-ka-1-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 138523 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-12-05 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-12-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 KA 30/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-ka-30-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:03:19 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:03:19 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-ka-30-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 138516 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-12-05 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-12-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 KR 230/22 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-kr-230-22-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:03:16 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:03:16 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-kr-230-22-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 138502 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-12-05 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-12-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 KR 373/22 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-kr-373-22-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:03:10 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:03:10 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-kr-373-22-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 138488 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-12-05 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-12-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 R 235/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-r-235-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:03:04 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:03:04 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-r-235-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 138464 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-12-05 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-12-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 16 KR 336/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-16-kr-336-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:02:53 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:02:53 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-16-kr-336-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 138453 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-12-05 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-12-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 14 U 171/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-14-u-171-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:02:49 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:02:49 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-14-u-171-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 138448 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-12-05 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-12-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 16 KR 433/22 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-16-kr-433-22-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:02:47 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:02:47 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-16-kr-433-22-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 138443 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-12-05 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-12-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 16 KR 256/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-16-kr-256-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:02:46 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:02:46 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-16-kr-256-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134948 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-12-05 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-12-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 BA 27/22 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-ba-27-22-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:27:18 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:27:18 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-ba-27-22-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 133175 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-12-05 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-12-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 9 SO 3201/22 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-9-so-3201-22-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:11:56 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:11:56 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-9-so-3201-22-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 133170 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-12-05 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-12-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 13 AS 2141/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-13-as-2141-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:11:54 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:11:54 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-13-as-2141-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 133164 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-12-05 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-12-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 15 AL 1855/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-15-al-1855-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:11:52 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:11:52 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-15-al-1855-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130933 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-12-05 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-12-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 20 KA 85/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-20-ka-85-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 00:50:28 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 23:50:28 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-20-ka-85-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130931 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-12-05 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-12-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 20 KA 56/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-20-ka-56-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 00:50:26 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 23:50:26 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-20-ka-56-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130929 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-12-05 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-12-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 24 KA 164/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-24-ka-164-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 00:50:24 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 23:50:24 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-24-ka-164-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130927 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-12-05 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-12-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 20 KA 187/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-20-ka-187-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 00:50:22 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 23:50:22 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-20-ka-187-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143676 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-12-04 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-12-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 8 AS 1311/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-8-as-1311-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:42:25 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:42:25 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-8-as-1311-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143616 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-12-04 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-12-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 8 AS 227/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-8-as-227-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:41:29 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:41:29 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-8-as-227-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 158074 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-12-02 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-12-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KA 3703/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-ka-3703-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:52:44 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:52:44 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-ka-3703-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 158069 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-12-02 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-12-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KA 3909/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-ka-3909-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:52:41 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:52:41 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-ka-3909-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 158064 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-12-02 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-12-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KR 522/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-kr-522-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:52:37 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:52:37 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-kr-522-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 158060 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-12-02 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-12-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KR 1980/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-kr-1980-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:52:35 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:52:35 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-kr-1980-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 158056 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-12-02 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-12-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KR 2686/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-kr-2686-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:52:32 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:52:32 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-kr-2686-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149764 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-12-05 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-12-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 KA 19/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-ka-19-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:44:16 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:44:16 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-ka-19-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => b4ebd4e69269a415cd409515f4b069fd [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:b2b774b5165d544f83cc6912d5ca2d30:0.69694600 1748159165 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.