| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Detmold | S 11 BA 90/20 | 13.12.2021 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 8 BA 48/22 B | 06.07.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 2. Dezember 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Münster | S 24 BA 12/20 ER | 18.02.2021 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 8 BA 33/21 B ER | 07.07.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 2. Dezember 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Aachen | S 2 AS 279/21 | 12.11.2021 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 2 AS 1918/21 B | 22.09.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 2. Dezember 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Duisburg | S 29 U 469/18 | 14.05.2021 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 15 U 286/21 | 20.09.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 2. Dezember 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 31 AS 51/22 | 12.08.2022 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 19 AS 1240/22 B | 03.11.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 2. Dezember 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 34 BA 103/20 ER | 18.09.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 8 BA 164/20 B ER | 03.02.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 2. Dezember 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | S 17 KR 9/22 ER | 29.03.2022 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 16 KR 389/22 B | 13.10.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 2. Dezember 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 34 BA 103/18 | 20.08.2019 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 8 BA 183/21 NZB | 22.12.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 2. Dezember 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Köln | S 33 R 1326/20 | 09.07.2021 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 3 R 764/21 NZB | 12.09.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 2. Dezember 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 43 SO 577/20 | 04.03.2022 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 9 SO 189/22 B | 01.09.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 2. Dezember 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 8 KR 1224/16 | 04.02.2021 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 16 KR 197/21 | 12.05.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 3 KR 31/22 B | 16.11.2022 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 2. Dezember 2022 |
| Sozialgericht München | S 38 KA 50/22 | 20.10.2022 | - | - | Sozialgericht München | 2. Dezember 2022 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Nürnberg | S 20 SO 105/20 ER | 14.07.2020 | - | - | Sozialgericht Nürnberg | 2. Dezember 2022 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Nürnberg | S 20 SO 63/20 ER | 29.04.2020 | - | - | Sozialgericht Nürnberg | 2. Dezember 2022 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Nürnberg | S 15 R 294/19 | 18.02.2021 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 14 R 162/21 | 12.05.2022 | - | Sozialgericht Nürnberg | 2. Dezember 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Nürnberg | S 11 KR 763/19 | 10.11.2022 | - | - | Sozialgericht Nürnberg | 2. Dezember 2022 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Nürnberg | S 7 KR 2016/18 | 21.02.2019 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 20 KR 150/19 | - | - | Sozialgericht Nürnberg | 2. Dezember 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Nürnberg | S 4 R 360/20 | 08.03.2021 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 14 R 184/21 | 07.07.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 5 R 15/22 | - | Sozialgericht Nürnberg | 2. Dezember 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Lübeck | S 45 R 75/16 | 07.11.2017 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 1 R 141/17 | 15.09.2022 | - | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | 1. Dezember 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Augsburg | S 3 AS 322/21 | 15.03.2022 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 AS 128/22 | 21.11.2022 | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 1. Dezember 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht München | S 49 KA 85/20 | 08.03.2021 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 12 KA 13/21 | 19.01.2022 | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 1. Dezember 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Würzburg | S 3 R 907/18 | 17.10.2019 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 19 R 540/19 | 06.04.2022 | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 1. Dezember 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 40 U 227/18 | 29.11.2019 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 2 U 1/20 | 28.10.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 20/20 R | 28.06.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | 1. Dezember 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Braunschweig | S 14 U 75/12 | 02.06.2016 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 16 U 129/16 | 29.08.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 9/20 R | 28.06.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | 1. Dezember 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 15 KR 6688/18 | 23.07.2019 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 11 KR 2846/19 | 30.03.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 19/21 R | 22.06.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | 1. Dezember 2022 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 177 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 177 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 177 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 4400, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 148275 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-12-02 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-12-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 BA 48/22 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-ba-48-22-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:30:40 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:30:40 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-ba-48-22-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 148270 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-12-02 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-12-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 BA 33/21 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-ba-33-21-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:30:38 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:30:38 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-ba-33-21-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 148264 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-12-02 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-12-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 AS 1918/21 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-as-1918-21-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:30:35 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:30:35 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-as-1918-21-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 148259 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-12-02 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-12-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 15 U 286/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-15-u-286-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:30:32 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:30:32 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-15-u-286-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 148248 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-12-02 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-12-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 19 AS 1240/22 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-19-as-1240-22-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:30:26 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:30:26 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-19-as-1240-22-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 148243 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-12-02 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-12-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 BA 164/20 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-ba-164-20-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:30:23 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:30:23 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-ba-164-20-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 148238 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-12-02 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-12-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 16 KR 389/22 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-16-kr-389-22-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:30:20 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:30:20 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-16-kr-389-22-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 148233 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-12-02 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-12-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 BA 183/21 NZB [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-ba-183-21-nzb [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:30:18 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:30:18 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-ba-183-21-nzb/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 148228 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-12-02 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-12-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 R 764/21 NZB [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-r-764-21-nzb [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:30:15 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:30:15 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-r-764-21-nzb/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 148223 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-12-02 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-12-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 SO 189/22 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-so-189-22-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:30:12 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:30:12 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-so-189-22-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 148218 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-12-02 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-12-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 16 KR 197/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-16-kr-197-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:30:10 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:30:10 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-16-kr-197-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143555 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-12-02 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-12-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 38 KA 50/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-38-ka-50-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:40:34 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:40:34 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-38-ka-50-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134693 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-12-02 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-12-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 20 SO 105/20 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-20-so-105-20-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:23:54 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:23:54 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-20-so-105-20-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134688 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-12-02 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-12-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 20 SO 63/20 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-20-so-63-20-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:23:51 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:23:51 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-20-so-63-20-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134683 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-12-02 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-12-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 15 R 294/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-15-r-294-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:23:50 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:23:50 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-15-r-294-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134678 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-12-02 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-12-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 11 KR 763/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-11-kr-763-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:23:47 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:23:47 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-11-kr-763-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134670 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-12-02 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-12-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 7 KR 2016/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-7-kr-2016-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:23:45 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:23:45 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-7-kr-2016-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134666 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-12-02 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-12-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 4 R 360/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-4-r-360-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:23:43 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:23:43 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-4-r-360-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150427 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-12-01 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-12-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 R 141/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-r-141-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:50:48 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:50:48 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-r-141-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130735 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-12-01 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-12-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 AS 128/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-as-128-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:09:09 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:09:09 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-as-128-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130734 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-12-01 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-12-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 12 KA 13/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-12-ka-13-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:09:07 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:09:07 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-12-ka-13-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130733 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-12-01 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-12-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 19 R 540/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-19-r-540-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:09:06 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:09:06 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-19-r-540-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87869 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-12-01 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-12-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 2 U 20/20 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-2-u-20-20-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:13:14 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:13:14 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-2-u-20-20-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87868 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-12-01 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-12-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 2 U 9/20 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-2-u-9-20-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:13:11 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:13:11 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-2-u-9-20-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87867 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-12-01 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-12-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 1 KR 19/21 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-1-kr-19-21-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:13:06 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:13:06 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-1-kr-19-21-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 148275 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-12-02 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-12-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 BA 48/22 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-ba-48-22-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:30:40 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:30:40 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-ba-48-22-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => ec30986238f68424e8cef84809d275e0 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:20568eacf6cedc769480740f27c0e7d3:0.05225100 1748159334 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.