| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 14 KA 686/12 | 18.04.2018 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 11 KA 56/18 | 27.04.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 30. November 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 39 BA 230/18 ER | 12.04.2021 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 8 BA 62/21 B ER | 16.02.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 30. November 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 44 R 284/16 | 23.02.2022 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 8 BA 30/22 B | 23.05.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 30. November 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 19 AS 3392/15 | 01.12.2016 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 6 AS 120/17 | 23.06.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 30. November 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Duisburg | S 27 R 1015/18 | 28.07.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 21 R 741/20 | 19.08.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 30. November 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 20 R 1499/17 | 23.10.2018 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 3 R 800/18 | 21.09.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 30. November 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Köln | S 27 SO 592/17 | 08.10.2021 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 12 SO 430/21 NZB | 08.09.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 30. November 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht München | S 7 KR 239/21 | 26.10.2022 | - | - | Sozialgericht München | 30. November 2022 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Gießen | S 16 SB 199/17 | 27.02.2020 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 SB 47/20 | 01.07.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 9 SB 30/22 B | 24.10.2022 | Sozialgericht Gießen | 29. November 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Gießen | S 16 SB 199/17 | 27.02.2020 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 SB 47/20 | 01.07.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 9 SB 30/22 B | 24.10.2022 | Sozialgericht Gießen | 29. November 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Leipzig | S 21 AS 518/22 ER | 28.07.2022 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 AS 396/22 B ER | 20.10.2022 | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 28. November 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Leipzig | S 11 R 302/20 ZV | 17.03.2022 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 R 208/22 ZV | 03.11.2022 | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 28. November 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Leipzig | S 11 R 435/19 ZV | 01.10.2021 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 R 561/21 ZV | 03.11.2022 | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 28. November 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Itzehoe | S 15 SO 37/22 ER | 07.09.2022 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 9 SO 99/22 B ER | 24.10.2022 | - | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | 28. November 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 8 U 28/14 | 14.11.2019 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 U 23/20 | 14.11.2022 | - | Sozialgericht Frankfurt | 28. November 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 8 U 28/14 | 14.11.2019 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 U 23/20 | 14.11.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 168/22 B | 08.03.2023 | Sozialgericht Frankfurt | 28. November 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Potsdam | S 1 KA 34/16 | 10.10.2018 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 7 KA 44/18 | 21.09.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 28. November 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 12 BA 262/18 | 19.08.2020 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 11 BA 3083/20 | 11.10.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 25. November 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 9 BA 1139/20 | 10.12.2020 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 11 BA 4134/20 | 11.10.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 25. November 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Heilbronn | S 15 KR 555/21 | 08.02.2022 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 11 KR 684/22 | 11.10.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 25. November 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 9 EG 1688/20 | 09.03.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 11 EG 1334/21 | 11.10.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 25. November 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Aachen | S 10 U 98/15 | 07.04.2017 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 15 U 316/17 | 06.09.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 164/22 B | 29.06.2023 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 25. November 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Aachen | S 4 AS 901/16 | 25.04.2018 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 12 AS 1048/18 | 06.07.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 25. November 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Köln | S 2 R 720/19 WA | 27.01.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 4 R 341/20 | 28.05.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 R 45/21 B | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 25. November 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Altenburg | S 2 R 121/21 | 24.06.2022 | - | - | Sozialgericht Altenburg | 25. November 2022 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 178 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 178 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 178 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 4425, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 148212 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-11-30 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-11-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 KA 56/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-ka-56-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:30:07 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:30:07 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-ka-56-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 148206 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-11-30 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-11-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 BA 62/21 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-ba-62-21-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:30:03 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:30:03 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-ba-62-21-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 148200 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-11-30 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-11-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 BA 30/22 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-ba-30-22-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:30:00 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:30:00 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-ba-30-22-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 148195 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-11-30 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-11-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 AS 120/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-as-120-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:29:57 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:29:57 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-as-120-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 148184 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-11-30 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-11-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 21 R 741/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-21-r-741-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:29:50 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:29:50 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-21-r-741-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 148177 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-11-30 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-11-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 R 800/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-r-800-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:29:47 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:29:47 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-r-800-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 148171 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-11-30 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-11-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 12 SO 430/21 NZB [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-12-so-430-21-nzb [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:29:44 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:29:44 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-12-so-430-21-nzb/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143552 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-11-30 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-11-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 7 KR 239/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-7-kr-239-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:40:32 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:40:32 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-7-kr-239-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134947 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-11-29 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-11-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 16 SB 199/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-16-sb-199-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:27:16 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:27:16 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-16-sb-199-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134946 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-11-29 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-11-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 SB 47/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-sb-47-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:27:15 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:27:15 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-sb-47-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160860 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-11-28 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-11-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 AS 396/22 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-as-396-22-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:28:20 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:28:20 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-as-396-22-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160857 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-11-28 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-11-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 R 208/22 ZV [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-r-208-22-zv [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:28:17 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:28:17 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-r-208-22-zv/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160854 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-11-28 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-11-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 R 561/21 ZV [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-r-561-21-zv [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:28:15 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:28:15 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-r-561-21-zv/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150424 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-11-28 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-11-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 SO 99/22 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-so-99-22-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:50:44 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:50:44 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-so-99-22-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 136948 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-11-28 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-11-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 8 U 28/14 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-8-u-28-14 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:42:00 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:42:00 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-8-u-28-14/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 136942 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-11-28 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-11-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 U 23/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-u-23-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:41:58 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:41:58 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-u-23-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128384 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-11-28 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-11-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 KA 44/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-ka-44-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:39:12 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:39:12 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-ka-44-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 158052 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-11-25 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-11-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 BA 3083/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-ba-3083-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:52:30 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:52:30 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-ba-3083-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 158048 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-11-25 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-11-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 BA 4134/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-ba-4134-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:52:27 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:52:27 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-ba-4134-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 158044 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-11-25 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-11-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 KR 684/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-kr-684-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:52:25 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:52:25 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-kr-684-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 158041 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-11-25 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-11-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 EG 1334/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-eg-1334-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:52:23 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:52:23 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-eg-1334-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 148165 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-11-25 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-11-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 15 U 316/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-15-u-316-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:29:40 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:29:40 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-15-u-316-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 148160 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-11-25 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-11-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 12 AS 1048/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-12-as-1048-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:29:37 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:29:37 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-12-as-1048-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 148155 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-11-25 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-11-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 R 341/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-r-341-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:29:34 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:29:34 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-r-341-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 132208 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-11-25 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-11-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 2 R 121/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-2-r-121-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:04:47 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:04:47 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-2-r-121-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 148212 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-11-30 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-11-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 KA 56/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-ka-56-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:30:07 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:30:07 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-ka-56-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 32847115306426466282e9e528c7b671 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:c4001838a0dbc276f50ae91a81d4f946:0.34321900 1748187494 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.