| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Altenburg | S 2 R 121/21 | 24.06.2022 | - | - | Sozialgericht Altenburg | 25. November 2022 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 166 KR 929/19 WA | 05.06.2020 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 9 KR 263/20 | 14.10.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 30/22 R | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 25. November 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 166 KR 930/19 WA | 05.06.2020 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 9 KR 264/20 | 14.10.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 35/22 R | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 25. November 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 53 AS 3381/22 ER | 18.07.2022 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 31 AS 690/22 B ER | 14.11.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 25. November 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Duisburg | S 49 AS 3258/21 | 02.05.2022 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 2 AS 795/22 B | 06.09.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 24. November 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Duisburg | S 48 SO 566/17 | 13.10.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 9 SO 403/20 | 08.09.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 8 SO 18/22 R | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 24. November 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 34 R 115/21 | 26.05.2021 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 3 R 514/21 | 07.09.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 24. November 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Aachen | S 10 AL 74/22 ER | 23.05.2022 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 9 AL 106/22 B ER | 01.09.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 24. November 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Köln | S 2 BA 177/20 ER | 12.11.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 8 BA 172/20 B ER | 01.12.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 24. November 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Duisburg | S 19 KA 4/19 | 24.08.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 11 KA 31/20 | 11.05.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 6 KA 24/22 B | 22.02.2023 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 24. November 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Köln | S 17 KR 284/18 | 02.07.2019 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 11 KR 540/19 | 25.08.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 82/21 B | 16.09.2022 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 24. November 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 20 SO 9/11 | 24.07.2017 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 SO 12/19 ZVW | 22.06.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 8 SO 60/22 BH | 06.10.2022 | Sozialgericht Frankfurt | 24. November 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 20 SO 9/11 | 24.07.2017 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 SO 12/19 ZVW | 22.06.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 8 SO 60/22 BH | 06.10.2022 | Sozialgericht Frankfurt | 24. November 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Würzburg | S 5 U 147/20 | 29.09.2020 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 17 U 310/20 | 16.06.2021 | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 24. November 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Augsburg | S 2 BA 1/20 | 17.02.2021 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 BA 26/21 | 28.06.2022 | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 24. November 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht München | S 58 AS 2796/18 | 18.10.2022 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 2 AS 492/22 B | 10.11.2022 | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 24. November 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Neuruppin | S 9 KR 80/17 | 04.03.2019 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 1 KR 118/19 | 08.09.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 88/22 B | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 24. November 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 221 KR 1521/19 | 19.05.2020 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 1 KR 275/20 | 15.09.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 87/22 B | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 24. November 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Cottbus | S 5 BA 13/18 | 01.02.2020 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 1 BA 25/20 | 15.09.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 24. November 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 211 KR 2991/18 | 06.01.2021 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 1 KR 45/21 | 15.09.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 24. November 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 166 KR 893/19 WA | 05.06.2020 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 9 KR 265/20 | 14.10.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 31/22 R | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 24. November 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Neuruppin | S 18 AS 1618/19 | 24.01.2019 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 9 AS 458/19 | 14.10.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 24. November 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Münster | S 10 U 394/19 | 17.05.2021 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 15 U 273/21 | 05.04.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 65/22 B | 08.11.2022 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 23. November 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Münster | S 11 AS 195/21 | 21.09.2021 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 21 AS 1438/21 | 25.03.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 4 A S 87/22 BH | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 23. November 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 34 KR 449/22 ER | 30.06.2022 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 16 KR 610/22 B ER | 21.09.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 3 KR 8/22 AR | 01.11.2022 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 23. November 2022 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 179 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 179 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 179 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 4450, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 132207 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-11-25 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-11-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 2 R 121/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-2-r-121-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:04:47 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:04:47 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-2-r-121-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128381 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-11-25 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-11-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 KR 263/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-kr-263-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:39:10 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:39:10 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-kr-263-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128378 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-11-25 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-11-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 KR 264/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-kr-264-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:39:08 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:39:08 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-kr-264-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128375 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-11-25 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-11-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 31 AS 690/22 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-31-as-690-22-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:39:07 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:39:07 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-31-as-690-22-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 148150 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-11-24 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-11-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 AS 795/22 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-as-795-22-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:29:32 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:29:32 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-as-795-22-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 148144 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-11-24 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-11-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 SO 403/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-so-403-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:29:28 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:29:28 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-so-403-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 148139 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-11-24 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-11-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 R 514/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-r-514-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:29:26 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:29:26 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-r-514-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 148134 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-11-24 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-11-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 AL 106/22 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-al-106-22-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:29:24 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:29:24 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-al-106-22-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 148130 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-11-24 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-11-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 BA 172/20 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-ba-172-20-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:29:21 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:29:21 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-ba-172-20-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 148125 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-11-24 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-11-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 KA 31/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-ka-31-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:29:18 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:29:18 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-ka-31-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 148120 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-11-24 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-11-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 KR 540/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-kr-540-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:29:16 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:29:16 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-kr-540-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 136937 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-11-24 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-11-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 20 SO 9/11 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-20-so-9-11 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:41:56 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:41:56 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-20-so-9-11/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 136932 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-11-24 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-11-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 SO 12/19 ZVW [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-so-12-19-zvw [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:41:54 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:41:54 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-so-12-19-zvw/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130732 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-11-24 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-11-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 17 U 310/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-17-u-310-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:09:04 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:09:04 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-17-u-310-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130731 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-11-24 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-11-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 BA 26/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-ba-26-21-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:09:02 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:09:02 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-ba-26-21-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130730 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-11-24 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-11-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 AS 492/22 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-as-492-22-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:09:00 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:09:00 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-as-492-22-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128372 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-11-24 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-11-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 118/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-118-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:39:05 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:39:05 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-118-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128369 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-11-24 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-11-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 275/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-275-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:39:03 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:39:03 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-275-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128366 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-11-24 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-11-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 BA 25/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-ba-25-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:39:01 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:39:01 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-ba-25-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128363 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-11-24 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-11-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 45/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-45-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:39:00 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:39:00 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-45-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128360 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-11-24 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-11-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 KR 265/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-kr-265-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:38:58 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:38:58 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-kr-265-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128357 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-11-24 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-11-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 AS 458/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-as-458-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:38:57 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:38:57 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-as-458-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 148115 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-11-23 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-11-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 15 U 273/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-15-u-273-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:29:13 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:29:13 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-15-u-273-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 148109 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-11-23 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-11-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 21 AS 1438/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-21-as-1438-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:29:10 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:29:10 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-21-as-1438-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 148103 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-11-23 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-11-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 16 KR 610/22 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-16-kr-610-22-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:29:06 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:29:06 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-16-kr-610-22-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 132207 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-11-25 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-11-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 2 R 121/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-2-r-121-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:04:47 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:04:47 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-2-r-121-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 4a55fd712db600fc59f697accded25cf [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:2d60447ee40c0121618250ff85bdc384:0.01029500 1748187495 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.