| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 16 R 2770/23 | 08.02.2024 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 10 R 819/24 | 18.07.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 11. Oktober 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Konstanz | S 5 U 404/21 | 13.02.2023 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 10 U 608/23 | 18.07.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 11. Oktober 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 22 R 2961/19 | 02.02.2022 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 10 R 694/24 | 18.04.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 9. Oktober 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 20 AS 453/22 | 08.02.2023 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 3 AS 840/23 | 30.11.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 9. Oktober 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 39 AS 2707/24 | 05.07.2024 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 32 AS 739/24 B ER | 05.09.2024 | - | Sozialgericht Berlin | 8. Oktober 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Detmold | S 1 U 19/23 | 18.08.2023 | - | - | Sozialgericht Detmold | 8. Oktober 2024 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Detmold | S 1 U 18/23 | 18.08.2023 | - | - | Sozialgericht Detmold | 8. Oktober 2024 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 97 R 1797/23 | 16.07.2024 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 22 R 409/24 B | 13.09.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 8. Oktober 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | - | - | - | Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | 7. Oktober 2024 | |||||
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 31 R 1975/16 | 20.06.2023 | - | - | Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | 7. Oktober 2024 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 7 KA 112/19 | 17.11.2021 | - | - | Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | 7. Oktober 2024 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Detmold | S 1 U 339/21 | 27.03.2024 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 17 U 150/24 | - | - | Sozialgericht Detmold | 7. Oktober 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 12 AS 1843/22 | 17.09.2024 | - | - | Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | 7. Oktober 2024 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Wiesbaden | S 2 KR 209/17 | 13.01.2022 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 KR 106/22 | 25.01.2024 | Bundessozialgericht | B 3 KR 7/24 R | - | Sozialgericht Wiesbaden | 7. Oktober 2024 |
| Sozialgericht Wiesbaden | S 2 KR 209/17 | 13.01.2022 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 KR 106/22 | 25.01.2024 | Bundessozialgericht | B 3 KR 7/24 R | - | Sozialgericht Wiesbaden | 7. Oktober 2024 |
| Sozialgericht Mannheim | S 13 U 3313/19 | 23.06.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 9 U 2494/21 | 20.02.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 4. Oktober 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 3 AS 1296/23 | 10.05.2023 | L 9 AS 1682/23 | 17.11.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 4. Oktober 2024 | |||
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 2 R 2188/20 | 25.03.2022 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 13 R 961/22 | 21.11.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 4. Oktober 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Ulm | S 8 VG 2490/20 | 13.09.2023 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 6 VG 2886/23 | 18.07.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 4. Oktober 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 15 KR 928/23 | 20.10.2023 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 11 KR 3343/23 | 14.05.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 4. Oktober 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 15 KR 3205/22 KH | 03.08.2023 | L 5 KR 787/23 NZB KH | 09.05.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 4. Oktober 2024 | |||
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 3 KR 384/22 | 18.10.2022 | L 10 KR 910/22 | 15.11.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 4. Oktober 2024 | |||
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 12 AS 3826/19 | 09.03.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 6 AS 380/20 B | 29.08.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 4. Oktober 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Aachen | S 25 AL 4/21 | 08.08.2022 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 9 AL 169/22 | 04.07.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 4. Oktober 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Köln | S 39 SB 1255/20 | 12.11.2021 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 13 SB 364/21 | 01.03.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 4. Oktober 2024 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 18 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 18 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 18 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 425, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161027 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-10-11 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-10-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 R 819/24 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-r-819-24 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:31:26 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:31:26 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-r-819-24/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161025 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-10-11 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-10-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 U 608/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-u-608-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:31:24 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:31:24 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-u-608-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161022 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-10-09 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-10-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 R 694/24 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-r-694-24 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:31:21 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:31:21 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-r-694-24/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161020 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-10-09 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-10-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 AS 840/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-as-840-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:31:18 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:31:18 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-as-840-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150384 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-10-08 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-10-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 32 AS 739/24 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-32-as-739-24-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:50:16 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:50:16 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-32-as-739-24-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140377 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-10-08 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-10-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 1 U 19/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-1-u-19-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:18:51 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:18:51 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-1-u-19-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140375 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-10-08 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-10-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 1 U 18/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-1-u-18-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:18:50 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:18:50 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-1-u-18-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129714 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-10-08 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-10-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 22 R 409/24 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-22-r-409-24-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:53:09 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:53:09 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-22-r-409-24-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 144996 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-10-07 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-10-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 31 R 2502/14 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-31-r-2502-14 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 03:01:39 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 02:01:39 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-31-r-2502-14/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 144995 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-10-07 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-10-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 31 R 1975/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-31-r-1975-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 03:01:37 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 02:01:37 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-31-r-1975-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 144994 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-10-07 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-10-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 7 KA 112/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-7-ka-112-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 03:01:35 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 02:01:35 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-7-ka-112-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140373 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-10-07 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-10-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 1 U 339/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-1-u-339-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:18:48 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:18:48 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-1-u-339-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140147 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-10-07 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-10-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 12 AS 1843/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-12-as-1843-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:15:26 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:15:26 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-12-as-1843-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134753 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-10-07 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-10-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 2 KR 209/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-2-kr-209-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:24:19 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:24:19 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-2-kr-209-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134749 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-10-07 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-10-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 KR 106/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-kr-106-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:24:17 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:24:17 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-kr-106-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161018 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-10-04 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-10-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 U 2494/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-u-2494-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:31:16 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:31:16 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-u-2494-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161016 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-10-04 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-10-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 AS 1682/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-as-1682-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:31:13 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:31:13 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-as-1682-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161014 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-10-04 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-10-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 13 R 961/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-13-r-961-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:31:11 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:31:11 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-13-r-961-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161012 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-10-04 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-10-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 VG 2886/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-vg-2886-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:31:09 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:31:09 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-vg-2886-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161010 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-10-04 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-10-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 KR 3343/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-kr-3343-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:31:05 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:31:05 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-kr-3343-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150911 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-10-04 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-10-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KR 787/23 NZB KH [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-kr-787-23-nzb-kh [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:59:15 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:59:15 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-kr-787-23-nzb-kh/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150909 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-10-04 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-10-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 KR 910/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-kr-910-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:59:12 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:59:12 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-kr-910-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150907 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-10-04 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-10-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 AS 380/20 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-as-380-20-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:59:10 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:59:10 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-as-380-20-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150905 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-10-04 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-10-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 AL 169/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-al-169-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:59:08 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:59:08 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-al-169-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150903 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-10-04 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-10-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 13 SB 364/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-13-sb-364-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:59:06 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:59:06 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-13-sb-364-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161027 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-10-11 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-10-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 R 819/24 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-r-819-24 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:31:26 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:31:26 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-r-819-24/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 3e32ddfffbb0ed494ca3debfd74783d0 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:256fd26594043b79a6a6954832a09282:0.82177300 1745088512 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.