| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Neuruppin | S 27 AY 4/22 ER | 02.08.2022 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 15 AY 13/22 B ER | 04.11.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 23. November 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 68 U 744/14 | 07.07.2016 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 3 U 118/16 | 18.10.2022 | B 2 U 155/22 B | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 23. November 2022 | |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 173 AS 2086/21 | 25.02.2022 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 3 AS 285/22 | 07.11.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 23. November 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 173 AS 2086/21 | 25.02.2022 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 3 AS 285/22 | 07.11.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 23. November 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 67 U 141/17 | 08.06.2021 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 3 U 119/21 B | 07.11.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 23. November 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 24 R 1864/17 ER | 15.02.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 8 BA 41/20 B ER | 18.08.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 22. November 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 15 R 1099/14 | 27.09.2016 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 3 R 1007/16 | 27.04.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 22. November 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Münster | S 23 BA 96/20 ER | 20.11.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 8 BA 3/21 B ER | 22.03.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 22. November 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Köln | S 21 KR 228/20 | 05.02.2021 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 16 KR 190/21 B | 29.08.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 22. November 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 44 R 99/14 | 04.07.2017 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 8 R 880/17 | 21.09.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 22. November 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Köln | S 16 U 518/21 ER | 19.01.2022 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 4 U 78/22 B ER | 31.08.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 22. November 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 10 R 988/20 | 26.01.2022 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 3 R 135/22 | 27.07.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 22. November 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 18 AS 2858/21 ER | 24.11.2021 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 6 AS 1781/21 B | 23.08.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 22. November 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Duisburg | S 38 AS 1929/18 | 20.08.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 7 AS 1637/20 | 26.07.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 22. November 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | S 45 KR 694/18 | 09.07.2019 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 5 KR 597/19 | 18.02.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 22. November 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Duisburg | S 50 KR 709/22 | 17.11.2022 | - | - | Sozialgericht Duisburg | 22. November 2022 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Duisburg | S 50 KR 1526/21 | 17.11.2022 | - | - | Sozialgericht Duisburg | 22. November 2022 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 33 AS 1402/19 | 22.03.2021 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 AS 196/21 | 03.06.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 7 AS 100/22 BH | 13.10.2022 | Sozialgericht Frankfurt | 22. November 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 33 AS 1402/19 | 22.03.2021 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 AS 196/21 | 03.06.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 7 AS 100/22 BH | 13.10.2022 | Sozialgericht Frankfurt | 22. November 2022 |
| - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 1 KR 267/20 KL | 24.08.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 3 KR 18/22 R | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 22. November 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Potsdam | S 28 KR 386/17 | 26.09.2019 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 1 KR 448/19 | 24.08.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 22. November 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Potsdam | S 28 KR 386/17 | 26.09.2019 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 1 KR 448/19 | 24.08.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 22. November 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 28 KR 63/22 | 16.11.2022 | - | - | Sozialgericht Berlin | 21. November 2022 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Duisburg | S 25 AS 791/22 ER | 29.06.2022 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 7 AS 1111/22 B ER, L 7 AS 1112/22 B | 29.08.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 21. November 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Aachen | S 7 R 608/19 | 09.03.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 18 R 306/20 | 09.03.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | B 5 R 21/21 R | 06.07.2022 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 21. November 2022 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 180 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 180 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 180 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 4475, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128354 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-11-23 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-11-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 15 AY 13/22 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-15-ay-13-22-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:38:55 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:38:55 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-15-ay-13-22-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128353 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-11-23 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-11-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 U 118/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-u-118-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:38:54 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:38:54 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-u-118-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128350 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-11-23 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-11-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 AS 285/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-as-285-22-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:38:52 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:38:52 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-as-285-22-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128349 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-11-23 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-11-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 AS 285/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-as-285-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:38:52 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:38:52 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-as-285-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128346 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-11-23 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-11-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 U 119/21 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-u-119-21-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:38:50 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:38:50 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-u-119-21-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 148097 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-11-22 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-11-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 BA 41/20 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-ba-41-20-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:29:03 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:29:03 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-ba-41-20-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 148092 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-11-22 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-11-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 R 1007/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-r-1007-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:29:00 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:29:00 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-r-1007-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 148087 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-11-22 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-11-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 BA 3/21 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-ba-3-21-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:28:57 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:28:57 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-ba-3-21-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 148082 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-11-22 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-11-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 16 KR 190/21 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-16-kr-190-21-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:28:55 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:28:55 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-16-kr-190-21-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 148078 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-11-22 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-11-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 R 880/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-r-880-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:28:53 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:28:53 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-r-880-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 148073 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-11-22 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-11-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 U 78/22 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-u-78-22-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:28:50 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:28:50 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-u-78-22-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 148068 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-11-22 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-11-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 R 135/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-r-135-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:28:48 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:28:48 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-r-135-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 148062 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-11-22 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-11-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 AS 1781/21 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-as-1781-21-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:28:45 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:28:45 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-as-1781-21-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 148056 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-11-22 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-11-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 AS 1637/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-as-1637-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:28:41 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:28:41 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-as-1637-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 148051 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-11-22 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-11-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KR 597/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-kr-597-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:28:39 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:28:39 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-kr-597-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143436 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-11-22 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-11-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 50 KR 709/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-50-kr-709-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:39:30 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:39:30 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-50-kr-709-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143432 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-11-22 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-11-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 50 KR 1526/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-50-kr-1526-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:39:29 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:39:29 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-50-kr-1526-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 136927 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-11-22 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-11-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 33 AS 1402/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-33-as-1402-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:41:52 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:41:52 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-33-as-1402-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 136923 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-11-22 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-11-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 AS 196/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-as-196-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:41:51 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:41:51 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-as-196-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128344 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-11-22 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-11-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 267/20 KL [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-267-20-kl [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:38:49 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:38:49 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-267-20-kl/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128341 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-11-22 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-11-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 448/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-448-19-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:38:47 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:38:47 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-448-19-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128340 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-11-22 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-11-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 448/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-448-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:38:47 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:38:47 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-448-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150221 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-11-21 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-11-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 28 KR 63/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-28-kr-63-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:48:30 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:48:30 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-28-kr-63-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 148046 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-11-21 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-11-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 AS 1111/22 B ER, L 7 AS 1112/22 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-as-1111-22-b-er-l-7-as-1112-22-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:28:36 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:28:36 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-as-1111-22-b-er-l-7-as-1112-22-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 148041 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-11-21 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-11-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 18 R 306/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-18-r-306-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:28:34 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:28:34 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-18-r-306-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128354 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-11-23 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-11-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 15 AY 13/22 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-15-ay-13-22-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:38:55 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:38:55 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-15-ay-13-22-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 97b4ebb3fcb5c7073856bffbf6c59e05 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:5a7bca32a462e555acef78be9eff1db5:0.91200400 1748213641 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.