| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | S 41 AS 469/19 | 21.07.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 21 AS 1280/20 | 28.05.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | B 7/14 AS 57/21 R | 13.07.2022 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 21. November 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 78 KR 3628/18 | 21.07.2021 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 5 KR 729/21 KH | 24.05.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 56/22 B | 18.08.2022 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 21. November 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Detmold | S 8 SB 924/17 | 14.09.2021 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 13 SB 302/21 | 25.04.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 9 SB 17/22 B | 30.08.2022 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 21. November 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Darmstadt | S 13 KR 111/20 | 24.10.2022 | - | - | Sozialgericht Darmstadt | 21. November 2022 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Darmstadt | S 13 KR 111/20 | 24.10.2022 | - | - | Sozialgericht Darmstadt | 21. November 2022 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Altenburg | S 2 R 365/19 und S 2 R 1983/18 | 21.05.2019 | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | L 12 R 829/19 und L 12 R 830/19 | 27.06.2022 | - | Sozialgericht Altenburg | 21. November 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Altenburg | S 2 R 365/19 und S 2 R 1983/18 | 21.05.2019 | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | L 12 R 829/19 und L 12 R 830/19 | 27.06.2022 | - | Sozialgericht Altenburg | 21. November 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Altenburg | S 40 AS 1970/19 | 14.07.2020 | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | L 7 AS 747/20 | 30.06.2022 | - | Sozialgericht Altenburg | 21. November 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Altenburg | S 19 SF 69/22 RH | 09.09.2022 | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | L 1 SV 754/22 B | 27.10.2022 | - | Sozialgericht Altenburg | 21. November 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Gotha | S 18 U 1061/19 | 15.03.2021 | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | L 1 U 398/21 | 04.08.2022 | - | Sozialgericht Gotha | 21. November 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 36 KR 1336/17 | 24.08.2018 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 1 BA 101/18 | 14.11.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 KR 1/20 R | 29.03.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | 21. November 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Duisburg | S 42 BK 8/18 | 06.02.2019 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 7 BK 1/19 | 10.12.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 7/14 KG 1/21 R | 13.07.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | 21. November 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | S 41 AS 469/19 | 21.07.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 21 AS 1280/20 | 28.05.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | B 7/14 AS 57/21 R | 13.07.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | 21. November 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 50 R 466/19 | 20.08.2019 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 R 631/19 | 30.03.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | B 5 R 39/21 R | 06.07.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | 21. November 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Cottbus | S 28 R 601/18 | 16.06.2020 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 33 R 506/20 | 09.06.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | B 5 R 22/21 R | 06.07.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | 21. November 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Aachen | S 7 R 608/19 | 09.03.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 18 R 306/20 | 09.03.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | B 5 R 21/21 R | 06.07.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | 21. November 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 9 KR 2365/17 | 17.01.2019 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 4 KR 640/19 | 26.03.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 38/21 R | 18.08.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | 21. November 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Marburg | S 17 KA 47/16 | 30.10.2019 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 KA 63/19 | 26.10.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 6 KA 38/22 B | - | Sozialgericht Marburg | 18. November 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Kiel | S 11 VG 96/14 | 07.07.2016 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 2 VG 50/16 | 15.07.2022 | - | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | 17. November 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Kassel | S 4 U 98/09 | 06.03.2013 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 U 13/18 | 31.10.2022 | - | Sozialgericht Kassel | 17. November 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Kassel | S 4 U 98/09 | 06.03.2013 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 U 13/18 | 31.10.2022 | - | Sozialgericht Kassel | 17. November 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Magdeburg | S 15 KR 443/15 | 06.03.2018 | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | L 6 KR 46/18 | 22.04.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 25/21 R | 22.06.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | 16. November 2022 |
| Sozialgericht München | S 15 KR 26/21 | 15.09.2022 | - | - | Sozialgericht München | 11. November 2022 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Aurich | S 18 KR 104/17 | 08.01.2021 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 16 KR 61/21 | 13.09.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 11. November 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Osnabrück | S 46 KR 65/15 | 18.11.2019 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 16/4 KR 548/19 | 13.09.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 11. November 2022 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 181 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 181 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 181 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 4500, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 148036 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-11-21 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-11-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 21 AS 1280/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-21-as-1280-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:28:31 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:28:31 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-21-as-1280-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 148031 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-11-21 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-11-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KR 729/21 KH [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-kr-729-21-kh [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:28:28 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:28:28 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-kr-729-21-kh/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 148026 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-11-21 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-11-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 13 SB 302/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-13-sb-302-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:28:26 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:28:26 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-13-sb-302-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 136829 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-11-21 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-11-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 13 KR 111/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-13-kr-111-20-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:41:16 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:41:16 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-13-kr-111-20-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 136828 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-11-21 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-11-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 13 KR 111/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-13-kr-111-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:41:16 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:41:16 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-13-kr-111-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 132204 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-11-21 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-11-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 12 R 829/19 und L 12 R 830/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-12-r-829-19-und-l-12-r-830-19-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:04:45 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:04:45 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-12-r-829-19-und-l-12-r-830-19-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 132203 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-11-21 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-11-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 12 R 829/19 und L 12 R 830/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-12-r-829-19-und-l-12-r-830-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:04:45 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:04:45 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-12-r-829-19-und-l-12-r-830-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 132199 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-11-21 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-11-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 AS 747/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-as-747-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:04:43 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:04:43 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-as-747-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 132196 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-11-21 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-11-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 SV 754/22 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-sv-754-22-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:04:42 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:04:42 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-sv-754-22-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 131395 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-11-21 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-11-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 U 398/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-u-398-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 00:57:08 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 23:57:08 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-u-398-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87866 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-11-21 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-11-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 12 KR 1/20 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-12-kr-1-20-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:12:59 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:12:59 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-12-kr-1-20-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87865 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-11-21 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-11-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 7/14 KG 1/21 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-7-14-kg-1-21-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:12:57 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:12:57 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-7-14-kg-1-21-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87864 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-11-21 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-11-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 7/14 AS 57/21 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-7-14-as-57-21-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:12:56 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:12:56 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-7-14-as-57-21-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87863 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-11-21 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-11-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 5 R 39/21 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-5-r-39-21-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:12:54 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:12:54 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-5-r-39-21-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87862 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-11-21 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-11-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 5 R 22/21 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-5-r-22-21-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:12:52 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:12:52 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-5-r-22-21-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87861 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-11-21 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-11-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 5 R 21/21 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-5-r-21-21-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:12:51 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:12:51 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-5-r-21-21-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87860 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-11-21 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-11-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 1 KR 38/21 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-1-kr-38-21-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:12:49 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:12:49 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-1-kr-38-21-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149759 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-11-18 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-11-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 KA 63/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-ka-63-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:44:13 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:44:13 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-ka-63-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150421 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-11-17 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-11-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 VG 50/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-vg-50-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:50:42 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:50:42 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-vg-50-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 139277 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-11-17 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-11-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 4 U 98/09 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-4-u-98-09 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:07:59 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:07:59 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-4-u-98-09/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 139272 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-11-17 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-11-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 U 13/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-u-13-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:07:58 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:07:58 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-u-13-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87859 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-11-16 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-11-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 1 KR 25/21 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-1-kr-25-21-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:12:47 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:12:47 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-1-kr-25-21-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143549 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-11-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-11-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 15 KR 26/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-15-kr-26-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:40:30 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:40:30 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-15-kr-26-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 138438 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-11-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-11-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 16 KR 61/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-16-kr-61-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:02:43 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:02:43 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-16-kr-61-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 138433 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-11-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-11-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 16/4 KR 548/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-16-4-kr-548-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:02:42 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:02:42 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-16-4-kr-548-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 148036 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-11-21 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-11-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 21 AS 1280/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-21-as-1280-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:28:31 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:28:31 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-21-as-1280-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => c393309a2fcf8d05407c122f3c460fbb [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:4695cf88180869d7a995f8d7ae2a2733:0.82296900 1748213016 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.