| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Hannover | S 22 U 153/17 | 09.01.2018 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 14 U 45/18 | 15.09.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 11. November 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Hannover | S 29 P 11/19 | 10.07.2020 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 12 P 37/20 | 25.10.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 11. November 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Lüneburg | S 50 AS 56/22 ER | 22.07.2022 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 11 AS 415/22 B ER | 27.09.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 11. November 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Stade | S 19 SO 76/17 WA | 21.03.2018 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 8 SO 91/18 | 08.09.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 11. November 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Stade | S 52 BA 8/18 | 17.12.2021 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 2 BA 6/22 | 07.09.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 11. November 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Hildesheim | S 7 VE 10/16 | 15.08.2018 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 10 VE 49/18 | 16.12.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 11. November 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Oldenburg | S 62 KR 590/20 | 12.07.2021 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 16 KR 421/21 | 13.09.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 11. November 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Braunschweig | S 42 VE 9/18 WA | 16.06.2020 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 10 VE 49/20 | 21.07.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 11. November 2022 | ||
| - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 8 SO 52/22 KL | 31.08.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 11. November 2022 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Würzburg | S 11 KR 598/19 | 27.09.2022 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 20 KR 433/22 | - | - | Sozialgericht Würzburg | 11. November 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Osnabrück | S 16 AS 212/22 ER | 25.08.2022 | - | - | Sozialgericht Osnabrück | 11. November 2022 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Braunschweig | S 13 R 545/18 | 17.06.2022 | - | - | Sozialgericht Braunschweig | 11. November 2022 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Lübeck | S 24 KR 665/17 | 25.08.2020 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 10 KR 381/20 | 27.09.2022 | - | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | 10. November 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Köln | S 39 SO 485/18 | 26.07.2019 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 12 SO 323/19 | 25.08.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | B 8 SO 61/21 B | 16.08.2022 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 10. November 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 5 BA 157/19 ER | 05.11.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 8 BA 196/20 B ER | 03.03.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 10. November 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 6 KN 318/15 | 21.01.2019 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 18 R 262/19 | 02.08.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 10. November 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Augsburg | S 2 BA 1/20 | 19.02.2021 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 BA 26/21 | 28.06.2022 | - | Sozialgericht Augsburg | 10. November 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 23 U 159/18 | 05.07.2022 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 U 143/22 B | 14.10.2022 | - | Sozialgericht Frankfurt | 10. November 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 23 U 159/18 | 05.07.2022 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 U 143/22 B | 14.10.2022 | - | Sozialgericht Frankfurt | 10. November 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 23 U 159/18 | 05.07.2022 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 U 143/22 B | 14.10.2022 | - | Sozialgericht Frankfurt | 10. November 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 191 AS 2357/22 ER | 15.06.2022 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 34 AS 587/22 B ER | 11.10.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 10. November 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 20 AS 594/20 | 11.04.2022 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 AS 245/22 B | 14.09.2022 | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 9. November 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Leipzig | S 17 AS 733/20 | 22.04.2020 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 AS 551/20 B | 21.09.2022 | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 9. November 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Chemnitz | S 15 KR 93/18 | 08.10.2019 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 1 KR 299/19 | 18.05.2022 | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 9. November 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Leipzig | S 8 KR 241/17 | 25.06.2019 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 1 KR 246/19 | 18.05.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 29/22 R | 16.05.2024 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 9. November 2022 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 182 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 182 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 182 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 4525, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 138428 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-11-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-11-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 14 U 45/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-14-u-45-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:02:40 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:02:40 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-14-u-45-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 138423 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-11-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-11-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 12 P 37/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-12-p-37-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:02:38 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:02:38 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-12-p-37-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 138418 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-11-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-11-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 AS 415/22 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-as-415-22-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:02:37 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:02:37 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-as-415-22-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 138413 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-11-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-11-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 SO 91/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-so-91-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:02:35 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:02:35 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-so-91-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 138408 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-11-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-11-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 BA 6/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-ba-6-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:02:33 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:02:33 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-ba-6-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 138404 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-11-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-11-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 VE 49/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-ve-49-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:02:31 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:02:31 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-ve-49-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 138399 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-11-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-11-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 16 KR 421/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-16-kr-421-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:02:30 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:02:30 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-16-kr-421-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 138394 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-11-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-11-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 VE 49/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-ve-49-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:02:28 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:02:28 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-ve-49-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 138389 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-11-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-11-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 SO 52/22 KL [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-so-52-22-kl [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:02:26 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:02:26 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-so-52-22-kl/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 132507 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-11-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-11-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 11 KR 598/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-11-kr-598-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:07:05 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:07:05 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-11-kr-598-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 131012 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-11-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-11-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 16 AS 212/22 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-16-as-212-22-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 00:52:09 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 23:52:09 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-16-as-212-22-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 71282 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-11-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-11-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 13 R 545/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-13-r-545-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 15:40:11 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 14:40:11 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-13-r-545-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150417 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-11-10 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-11-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 KR 381/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-kr-381-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:50:39 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:50:39 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-kr-381-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 148021 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-11-10 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-11-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 12 SO 323/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-12-so-323-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:28:23 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:28:23 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-12-so-323-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 148017 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-11-10 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-11-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 BA 196/20 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-ba-196-20-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:28:21 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:28:21 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-ba-196-20-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 148012 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-11-10 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-11-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 18 R 262/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-18-r-262-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:28:18 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:28:18 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-18-r-262-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140319 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-11-10 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-11-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 2 BA 1/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-2-ba-1-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:17:56 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:17:56 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-2-ba-1-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 136918 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-11-10 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-11-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 23 U 159/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-23-u-159-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:41:49 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:41:49 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-23-u-159-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 136917 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-11-10 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-11-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 23 U 159/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-23-u-159-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:41:49 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:41:49 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-23-u-159-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 136914 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-11-10 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-11-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 U 143/22 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-u-143-22-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:41:47 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:41:47 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-u-143-22-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128334 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-11-10 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-11-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 34 AS 587/22 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-34-as-587-22-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:38:44 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:38:44 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-34-as-587-22-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160851 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-11-09 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-11-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 AS 245/22 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-as-245-22-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:28:12 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:28:12 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-as-245-22-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160848 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-11-09 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-11-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 AS 551/20 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-as-551-20-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:28:10 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:28:10 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-as-551-20-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160845 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-11-09 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-11-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 299/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-299-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:28:07 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:28:07 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-299-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160842 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-11-09 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-11-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 246/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-246-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:28:05 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:28:05 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-246-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 138428 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-11-11 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-11-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 14 U 45/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-14-u-45-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:02:40 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:02:40 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-14-u-45-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => b182d845d4fb649745157fc1260654a3 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:47bf1828c48ad740ec23431d1a3ccf4d:0.55466800 1749033260 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.