| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Mannheim | S 8 R 983/20 | 10.11.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 8 R 3712/21 | 23.09.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 3. November 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 128 AS 16169/16 | 21.02.2019 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 14 AS 494/19 | 01.09.2022 | - | Sozialgericht Berlin | 3. November 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 58 AL 5203/13 | 26.01.2018 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 14 AL 42/18 | 18.08.2022 | - | Sozialgericht Berlin | 3. November 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht München | S 38 KA 5112/21 | 28.09.2022 | - | - | Sozialgericht München | 3. November 2022 | ||||
| Sozialgericht München | S 49 KA 59/18 | 23.10.2019 | - | - | Sozialgericht München | 3. November 2022 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Darmstadt | S 19 AS 53/20 | 12.01.2021 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 6 AS 80/21 | 30.08.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | B 14 AS 302/21 | 04.08.2022 | Sozialgericht Darmstadt | 3. November 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Darmstadt | S 19 AS 51/20 | 12.01.2021 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 6 AS 79/21 | 30.08.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | B 14 AS 301/21 | 04.08.2022 | Sozialgericht Darmstadt | 3. November 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Darmstadt | S 19 AS 51/20 | 12.01.2021 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 6 AS 79/21 | 30.08.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | B 14 AS 301/21 | 04.08.2022 | Sozialgericht Darmstadt | 3. November 2022 |
| Sozialgericht München | S 16 AY 91/22 ER | 03.08.2022 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 AY 106/22 B ER | 24.10.2022 | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 3. November 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Würzburg | S 18 AY 80/22 ER | 30.05.2022 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 AY 66/22 B ER | 28.10.2022 | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 3. November 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Augsburg | S 2 BA 1/20 | 17.02.2021 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 BA 26/21 | 25.10.2022 | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 3. November 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 221 KR 3260/15 | 27.08.2018 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 28 KR 260/18 | 21.10.2022 | B 3 KR 20/22 R | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 3. November 2022 | |
| - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 37 SF 294/20 EK AS | 22.09.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 3. November 2022 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Mannheim | S 9 SO 100/19 | 08.10.2019 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 7 SO 3752/19 | 19.11.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 8 SO 17/20 R | 16.02.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | 3. November 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 39 KR 1429/16 | 27.06.2017 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 16 KR 505/17 | 03.12.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 17/21 R | 22.06.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | 3. November 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Reutlingen | S 2 R 1335/19 | 06.07.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 8 R 2664/21 | 23.09.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 2. November 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 5 SO 3075/17 | 23.04.2018 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 2 SO 1906/18 | 17.08.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 2. November 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 7 SO 4127/18 | 21.12.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 2 SO 63/22 | 17.08.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 2. November 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Augsburg | S 10 P 119/19 | 17.02.2020 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | S 4 P 37/20 | 10.06.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 3 P 16/21 B | 27.08.2021 | Sozialgericht Augsburg | 2. November 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Augsburg | S 10 P 119/19 | 17.02.2020 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | S 4 P 37/20 | 10.06.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 3 P 16/21 B | 27.08.2021 | Sozialgericht Augsburg | 2. November 2022 |
| - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 9 KR 170/19 KL | 22.06.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 2. November 2022 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Lübeck | S 45 R 35/20 | 02.07.2021 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 R 10006/21 | 26.04.2022 | - | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | 1. November 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Lübeck | S 45 R 35/20 | 02.07.2021 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 R 10006/21 | 26.04.2022 | - | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | 1. November 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Darmstadt | S 11 AL 105/16 ER | 04.05.2016 | - | - | Sozialgericht Darmstadt | 1. November 2022 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Darmstadt | S 33 AS 954/16 | 06.07.2020 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 6 AS 486/20 | 23.02.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 4 AS 48/22 B | 26.08.2022 | Sozialgericht Darmstadt | 1. November 2022 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 184 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 184 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 184 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 4575, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 158028 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-11-03 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-11-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 R 3712/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-r-3712-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:52:14 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:52:14 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-r-3712-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150218 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-11-03 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-11-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 14 AS 494/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-14-as-494-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:48:28 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:48:28 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-14-as-494-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150214 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-11-03 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-11-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 14 AL 42/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-14-al-42-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:48:26 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:48:26 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-14-al-42-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143540 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-11-03 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-11-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 38 KA 5112/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-38-ka-5112-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:40:25 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:40:25 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-38-ka-5112-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143538 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-11-03 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-11-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 49 KA 59/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-49-ka-59-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:40:23 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:40:23 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-49-ka-59-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 136810 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-11-03 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-11-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 19 AS 53/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-19-as-53-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:41:09 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:41:09 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-19-as-53-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 136803 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-11-03 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-11-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 AS 79/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-as-79-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:41:07 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:41:07 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-as-79-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 136798 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-11-03 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-11-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 19 AS 51/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-19-as-51-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:41:05 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:41:05 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-19-as-51-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130728 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-11-03 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-11-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 AY 106/22 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-ay-106-22-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:08:57 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:08:57 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-ay-106-22-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130727 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-11-03 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-11-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 AY 66/22 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-ay-66-22-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:08:54 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:08:54 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-ay-66-22-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130726 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-11-03 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-11-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 BA 26/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-ba-26-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:08:53 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:08:53 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-ba-26-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128316 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-11-03 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-11-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 28 KR 260/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-28-kr-260-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:38:34 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:38:34 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-28-kr-260-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128313 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-11-03 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-11-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 37 SF 294/20 EK AS [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-37-sf-294-20-ek-as [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:38:32 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:38:32 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-37-sf-294-20-ek-as/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87858 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-11-03 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-11-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 8 SO 17/20 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-8-so-17-20-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:12:45 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:12:45 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-8-so-17-20-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87857 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-11-03 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-11-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 1 KR 17/21 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-1-kr-17-21-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:12:43 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:12:43 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-1-kr-17-21-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 158024 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-11-02 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-11-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 R 2664/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-r-2664-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:52:12 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:52:12 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-r-2664-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 158020 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-11-02 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-11-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 SO 1906/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-so-1906-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:52:10 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:52:10 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-so-1906-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 158017 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-11-02 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-11-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 SO 63/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-so-63-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:52:07 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:52:07 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-so-63-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140315 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-11-02 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-11-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 10 P 119/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-10-p-119-19-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:17:53 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:17:53 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-10-p-119-19-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140314 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-11-02 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-11-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 10 P 119/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-10-p-119-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:17:53 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:17:53 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-10-p-119-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128310 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-11-02 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-11-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 KR 170/19 KL [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-kr-170-19-kl [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:38:30 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:38:30 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-kr-170-19-kl/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150415 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-11-01 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-11-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 R 10006/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-r-10006-21-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:50:37 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:50:37 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-r-10006-21-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150414 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-11-01 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-11-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 R 10006/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-r-10006-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:50:37 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:50:37 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-r-10006-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 136793 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-11-01 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-11-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 11 AL 105/16 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-11-al-105-16-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:41:03 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:41:03 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-11-al-105-16-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 136789 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-11-01 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-11-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 33 AS 954/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-33-as-954-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:41:02 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:41:02 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-33-as-954-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 158028 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-11-03 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-11-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 R 3712/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-r-3712-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:52:14 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:52:14 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-r-3712-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 581d4b94c0070f6fb5954e458ccc58a1 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:10936c7bf7b2e1e147e542c02265a7d4:0.26157000 1750255583 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.