| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Darmstadt | S 33 AS 954/16 | 06.07.2020 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 6 AS 486/20 | 23.02.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 4 AS 48/22 B | 26.08.2022 | Sozialgericht Darmstadt | 1. November 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Gießen | S 5 KR 78/18 | 19.04.2018 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 1 KR 565/18 | 18.03.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 40/21 B | 12.07.2022 | Sozialgericht Gießen | 1. November 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Gießen | S 5 KR 78/18 | 19.04.2018 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 1 KR 565/18 | 18.03.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 40/21 B | 12.07.2022 | Sozialgericht Gießen | 1. November 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Darmstadt | S 20 KG 7/19 | 17.11.2020 | - | - | Sozialgericht Darmstadt | 31. Oktober 2022 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Fulda | S 4 SF 3/22 K | - | - | - | Sozialgericht Fulda | 31. Oktober 2022 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 28 SO 6390/18 | 04.07.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 2 SO 2598/21 | 17.08.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 28. Oktober 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Heilbronn | S 7 U 979/15 | 22.03.2017 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 10 U 1736/17 | 25.03.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 28. Oktober 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 4 R 5638/18 | 10.04.2019 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 10 R 1589/19 | 10.02.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 28. Oktober 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Heilbronn | S 13 U 993/20 | 21.10.2020 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 10 U 3803/20 | 22.07.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 28. Oktober 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Heilbronn | S 15 R 2430/21 | 21.12.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 10 R 3947/21 | 17.02.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 28. Oktober 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Konstanz | S 1 SF 716/21 E | 25.05.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 10 SF 1848/21 E-B | 18.02.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 28. Oktober 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Ulm | S 9 U 3798/16 | 01.08.2017 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 10 U 3569/17 | 10.03.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 28. Oktober 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Hildesheim | S 44 SO 4010/22 ER | 25.05.2022 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 8 SO 56/22 B ER | 24.08.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 28. Oktober 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Hannover | S 32 EG 2/19 | 18.02.2022 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 2 EG 5/22 | 20.06.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 28. Oktober 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Aurich | S 13 SO 32/16 | 01.11.2018 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 8 SO 277/18 | 07.07.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 28. Oktober 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Braunschweig | S 11 SB 195/17 | 28.03.2019 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 10 SB 50/19 | 28.04.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 28. Oktober 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Braunschweig | S 11 SB 195/17 | 28.03.2019 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 10 SB 50/19 | 28.04.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 28. Oktober 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Osnabrück | S 2 VE 9/15 | 04.07.2019 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 10 VE 51/20 | 31.05.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 28. Oktober 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Stade | S 32 AS 226/17 | 07.12.2020 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 13 AS 26/21 | 09.03.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 28. Oktober 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Hannover | S 24 KA 169/17 | 26.06.2019 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 3 KA 46/19 | 25.05.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 28. Oktober 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Hannover | S 22 U 77/19 | 16.11.2020 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 3 U 177/20 | 27.04.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 28. Oktober 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Lüneburg | 11 VE 6/19 | 10.03.2021 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 7 KO 4/21 (VE) | 16.06.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 28. Oktober 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Oldenburg | S 13 VJ 16/15 | 03.06.2020 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 10 VE 47/20 | 30.06.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 28. Oktober 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Oldenburg | S 81 R 22/17 | 20.11.2019 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 12 BA 29/19 | 28.04.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 28. Oktober 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht München | S 59 P 445/21 LP | 16.03.2022 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 P 31/22 LP | 28.07.2022 | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 27. Oktober 2022 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 185 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 185 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 185 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 4600, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 136784 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-11-01 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-11-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 AS 486/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-as-486-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:41:00 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:41:00 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-as-486-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134944 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-11-01 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-11-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 5 KR 78/15 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-5-kr-78-15 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:27:11 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:27:11 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-5-kr-78-15/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134943 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-11-01 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-11-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 565/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-565-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:27:10 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:27:10 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-565-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 136778 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-10-31 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-10-31 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 20 KG 7/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-20-kg-7-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:40:58 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:40:58 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-20-kg-7-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134597 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-10-31 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-10-31 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 4 SF 3/22 K [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-4-sf-3-22-k [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:23:19 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:23:19 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-4-sf-3-22-k/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 158013 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-10-28 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-10-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 SO 2598/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-so-2598-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:52:05 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:52:05 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-so-2598-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 158010 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-10-28 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-10-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 U 1736/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-u-1736-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:52:03 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:52:03 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-u-1736-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 158006 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-10-28 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-10-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 R 1589/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-r-1589-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:52:00 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:52:00 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-r-1589-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 158002 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-10-28 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-10-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 U 3803/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-u-3803-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:51:58 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:51:58 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-u-3803-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 157998 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-10-28 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-10-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 R 3947/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-r-3947-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:51:55 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:51:55 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-r-3947-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 157994 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-10-28 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-10-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 SF 1848/21 E-B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-sf-1848-21-e-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:51:53 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:51:53 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-sf-1848-21-e-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 157990 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-10-28 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-10-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 U 3569/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-u-3569-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:51:51 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:51:51 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-u-3569-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 138385 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-10-28 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-10-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 SO 56/22 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-so-56-22-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:02:25 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:02:25 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-so-56-22-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 138381 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-10-28 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-10-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 EG 5/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-eg-5-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:02:23 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:02:23 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-eg-5-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 138372 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-10-28 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-10-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 SO 277/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-so-277-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:02:21 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:02:21 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-so-277-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 138368 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-10-28 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-10-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 SB 50/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-sb-50-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:02:19 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:02:19 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-sb-50-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 138367 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-10-28 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-10-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 SB 50/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-sb-50-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:02:19 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:02:19 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-sb-50-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 138363 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-10-28 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-10-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 VE 51/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-ve-51-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:02:17 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:02:17 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-ve-51-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 138358 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-10-28 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-10-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 13 AS 26/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-13-as-26-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:02:16 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:02:16 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-13-as-26-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 138353 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-10-28 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-10-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 KA 46/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-ka-46-19-5 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:02:13 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:02:13 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-ka-46-19-5/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 138348 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-10-28 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-10-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 U 177/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-u-177-20-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:02:12 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:02:12 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-u-177-20-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 138339 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-10-28 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-10-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 KO 4/21 (VE) [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-ko-4-21-ve-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:02:09 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:02:09 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-ko-4-21-ve-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 138333 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-10-28 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-10-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 VE 47/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-ve-47-20-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:02:06 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:02:06 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-ve-47-20-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 138328 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-10-28 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-10-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 12 BA 29/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-12-ba-29-19-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:02:05 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:02:05 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-12-ba-29-19-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130725 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-10-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-10-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 P 31/22 LP [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-p-31-22-lp [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:08:51 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:08:51 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-p-31-22-lp/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 136784 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-11-01 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-11-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 AS 486/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-as-486-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:41:00 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:41:00 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-as-486-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 93dc9f91eb22e61e0ee5629e1c896649 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:31a74dfb0652ed3dfb2d6be5d5f9bc9c:0.40582600 1748395896 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.