| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht München | S 33 U 219/11 | 10.12.2014 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 2 U 21/15 | 02.03.2022 | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 27. Oktober 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 195 SO 3349/13 | 08.09.2016 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 15 SO 274/16 | 13.02.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 8 SO 9/20 R | 19.05.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | 27. Oktober 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 212 SO 231/16 | 21.07.2017 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 15 SO 236/17 | 23.03.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | B 8 SO 1/21 R | 19.05.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | 27. Oktober 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Koblenz | S 15 U 100/17 | 13.03.2018 | Landessozialgericht Rheinland-Pfalz | L 3 U 66/18 | 15.10.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 8/20 R | 28.06.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | 27. Oktober 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Mannheim | S 4 KR 2284/20 | 22.10.2020 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 11 KR 3455/20 | 27.04.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 50/21 B | 18.08.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | 27. Oktober 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Marburg | S 4 R 99/17 | 11.08.2021 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 BA 65/21 | 29.09.2022 | - | Sozialgericht Marburg | 26. Oktober 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Marburg | S 4 R 99/17 | 11.08.2021 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 BA 65/21 | 29.09.2022 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | B 12 BA 9/22 R | - | Sozialgericht Marburg | 26. Oktober 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Duisburg | S 49 U 613/17 | 23.09.2022 | - | - | Sozialgericht Duisburg | 26. Oktober 2022 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 25 KR 932/22 DS ER | 01.06.2022 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 KR 168/22 DS B ER | 14.09.2022 | - | Sozialgericht Frankfurt | 24. Oktober 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 25 KR 932/22 DS ER | 01.06.2022 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 KR 168/22 DS B ER | 14.09.2022 | - | Sozialgericht Frankfurt | 24. Oktober 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Wiesbaden | S 8 R 195/17 | 27.11.2020 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 BA 18/21 | 28.07.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 BA 29/22 B | - | Sozialgericht Wiesbaden | 24. Oktober 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Wiesbaden | S 8 R 195/17 | 27.11.2020 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 BA 18/21 | 28.07.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 BA 29/22 B | - | Sozialgericht Wiesbaden | 24. Oktober 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Nürnberg | S 22 AL 411/21 | 28.09.2022 | - | - | Sozialgericht Nürnberg | 24. Oktober 2022 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Heilbronn | S 3 U 2270/19 | 02.09.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 1 U 3739/21 | 07.02.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 23. Oktober 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 11 BA 532/18 | 26.02.2020 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 5 BA 2707/20 | 26.01.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 23. Oktober 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Ulm | S 13 R 1601/16 | 20.12.2018 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 5 R 591/19 | 26.01.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 23. Oktober 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Heilbronn | S 13 U 19/18 | 19.09.2019 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 10 U 3559/19 | 17.02.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 21. Oktober 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Heilbronn | S 21 R 799/16 | 19.03.2020 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 8 R 3386/19 | 21.01.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 21. Oktober 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 19 AS 5396/17 | 31.01.2019 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 9 AS 879/19 | 15.02.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 21. Oktober 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Reutlingen | S 4 U 3065/17 | 19.02.2020 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 10 U 1042/20 | 17.02.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 21. Oktober 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Mannheim | S 17 AS 2876/21 | 31.03.2022 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 13 AS 1045/22 | 31.05.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 21. Oktober 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 16 R 1287/15 | 16.11.2017 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 5 R 968/19 | 26.01.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 21. Oktober 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Heilbronn | S 13 U 2979/17 | 27.07.2020 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 10 U 3002/20 | 24.03.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 21. Oktober 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Heilbronn | S 4 U 2909/17 | 14.08.2018 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 10 U 3283/18 | 24.03.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 21. Oktober 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Ulm | S 2 U 2911/16 | 21.11.2017 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 10 U 145/18 | 29.03.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 21. Oktober 2022 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 186 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 186 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 186 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 4625, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130724 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-10-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-10-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 U 21/15 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-u-21-15 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:08:50 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:08:50 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-u-21-15/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87856 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-10-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-10-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 8 SO 9/20 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-8-so-9-20-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:12:42 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:12:42 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-8-so-9-20-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87855 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-10-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-10-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 8 SO 1/21 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-8-so-1-21-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:12:39 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:12:39 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-8-so-1-21-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87854 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-10-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-10-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 2 U 8/20 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-2-u-8-20-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:12:38 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:12:38 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-2-u-8-20-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87853 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-10-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-10-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 1 KR 50/21 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-1-kr-50-21-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:12:37 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:12:37 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-1-kr-50-21-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149755 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-10-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-10-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 4 R 99/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-4-r-99-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:44:10 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:44:10 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-4-r-99-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149750 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-10-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-10-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 BA 65/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-ba-65-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:44:07 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:44:07 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-ba-65-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143428 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-10-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-10-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 49 U 613/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-49-u-613-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:39:27 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:39:27 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-49-u-613-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 136898 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-10-24 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-10-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 25 KR 932/22 DS ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-25-kr-932-22-ds-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:41:42 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:41:42 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-25-kr-932-22-ds-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 136893 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-10-24 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-10-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 KR 168/22 DS B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-kr-168-22-ds-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:41:41 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:41:41 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-kr-168-22-ds-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134684 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-10-24 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-10-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 8 R 195/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-8-r-195-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:23:50 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:23:50 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-8-r-195-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134682 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-10-24 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-10-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 BA 18/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-ba-18-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:23:49 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:23:49 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-ba-18-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134661 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-10-24 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-10-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 22 AL 411/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-22-al-411-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:23:42 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:23:42 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-22-al-411-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 157986 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-10-23 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-10-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 U 3739/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-u-3739-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:51:49 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:51:49 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-u-3739-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 157983 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-10-23 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-10-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 BA 2707/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-ba-2707-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:51:46 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:51:46 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-ba-2707-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 157978 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-10-23 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-10-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 R 591/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-r-591-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:51:43 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:51:43 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-r-591-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 157973 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-10-21 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-10-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 U 3559/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-u-3559-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:51:40 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:51:40 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-u-3559-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 157969 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-10-21 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-10-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 R 3386/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-r-3386-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:51:37 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:51:37 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-r-3386-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 157965 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-10-21 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-10-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 AS 879/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-as-879-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:51:34 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:51:34 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-as-879-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 157961 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-10-21 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-10-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 U 1042/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-u-1042-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:51:31 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:51:31 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-u-1042-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 157957 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-10-21 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-10-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 13 AS 1045/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-13-as-1045-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:51:29 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:51:29 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-13-as-1045-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 157953 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-10-21 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-10-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 R 968/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-r-968-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:51:27 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:51:27 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-r-968-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 157949 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-10-21 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-10-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 U 3002/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-u-3002-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:51:24 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:51:24 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-u-3002-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 157946 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-10-21 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-10-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 U 3283/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-u-3283-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:51:22 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:51:22 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-u-3283-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 157942 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-10-21 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-10-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 U 145/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-u-145-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:51:19 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:51:19 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-u-145-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130724 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-10-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-10-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 U 21/15 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-u-21-15 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:08:50 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:08:50 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-u-21-15/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => f34dd00ea1b6aa779751882dcde915b5 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:fe316ab5ae02ba80d12c0db06f421cbd:0.27008600 1748507731 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.