| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 13 U 3641/17 | 13.02.2020 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 10 U 1019/20 | 12.05.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 21. Oktober 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Reutlingen | S 4 U 1552/18 | 02.10.2018 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 10 U 4041/18 | 12.05.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 21. Oktober 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 2 R 723/20 | 20.07.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 10 R 2529/21 | 21.07.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 21. Oktober 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht München | S 38 KA 114/18 | 20.09.2022 | - | - | Sozialgericht München | 21. Oktober 2022 | ||||
| Sozialgericht München | S 38 KA 176/20 | 20.09.2022 | - | - | Sozialgericht München | 21. Oktober 2022 | ||||
| Sozialgericht München | S 49 KA 97/21 | 20.07.2022 | - | - | Sozialgericht München | 21. Oktober 2022 | ||||
| Sozialgericht München | S 49 KA 68/21 | 20.07.2022 | - | - | Sozialgericht München | 21. Oktober 2022 | ||||
| Sozialgericht München | S 49 KA 139/21 | 05.05.2022 | - | - | Sozialgericht München | 21. Oktober 2022 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Detmold | S 22 R 1146/14 | 15.08.2015 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 8 R 811/15 | - | - | Sozialgericht Detmold | 20. Oktober 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Landshut | S 1 SB 358/22 ER | 18.08.2022 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 2 SB 129/22 B ER | 13.10.2022 | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 20. Oktober 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 206 AS 9460/16 | 05.03.2018 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 29 AS 620/18 | 14.09.2022 | B 4 AS 134/22 B | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 20. Oktober 2022 | |
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 8 KR 1059/16 WA | 10.09.2019 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 1 KR 114/19 | 25.02.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 14/21 R | 26.04.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | 20. Oktober 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Leipzig | S 10 SO 115/16 | 05.12.2017 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 SO 6/18 | 29.08.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 8 SO 13/20 R | 19.05.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | 20. Oktober 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 56 KR 464/19 | 24.10.2019 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 9 KR 424/19 | 26.01.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | B 3 KS 1/21 R | 01.06.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | 20. Oktober 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 8 KR 1552/17 | 01.10.2019 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 1 KR 5/20 | 12.11.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 3 KR 5/21 R | 01.06.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | 20. Oktober 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 18 KR 4297/16 | 02.06.2020 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 5 KR 2097/20 | 18.08.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | B 3 KR 1/22 R | 14.07.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | 20. Oktober 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Detmold | S 21 BA 9/21 ER | 11.06.2021 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 8 BA 80/21 B ER | - | - | Sozialgericht Detmold | 19. Oktober 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Detmold | S 12 AS 11/20 | 13.07.2021 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 7 AS 1200/21 | 18.11.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | B 7/14 AS 383/21 B | 07.09.2022 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 18. Oktober 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Köln | S 29 SB 685/20 | 04.02.2022 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 15 SB 242/22 B | 23.08.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 18. Oktober 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Duisburg | S 60 KR 1107/18 | 17.08.2022 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 10 KR 262/21 KH | 17.08.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 18. Oktober 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 2 KA 699/12 | 23.05.2018 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 11 KA 61/18 | 27.04.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 18. Oktober 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 2 KA 699/12 | 23.05.2018 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 11 KA 61/18 | 27.04.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 18. Oktober 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Köln | S 15 AS 5208/18 | 28.05.2021 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 19 AS 1224/21 | 18.08.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 18. Oktober 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Kassel | S 3 P 26/20 | 21.06.2021 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 6 P 27/21 | 24.08.2022 | - | Sozialgericht Kassel | 18. Oktober 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 34 R 102/18 ZV | 30.03.2022 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 R 186/22 ZV | 06.10.2022 | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 17. Oktober 2022 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 187 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 187 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 187 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 4650, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 157937 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-10-21 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-10-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 U 1019/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-u-1019-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:51:16 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:51:16 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-u-1019-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 157932 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-10-21 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-10-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 U 4041/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-u-4041-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:51:12 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:51:12 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-u-4041-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 157928 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-10-21 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-10-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 R 2529/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-r-2529-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:51:10 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:51:10 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-r-2529-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143535 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-10-21 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-10-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 38 KA 114/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-38-ka-114-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:40:21 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:40:21 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-38-ka-114-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143532 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-10-21 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-10-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 38 KA 176/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-38-ka-176-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:40:19 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:40:19 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-38-ka-176-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143529 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-10-21 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-10-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 49 KA 97/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-49-ka-97-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:40:17 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:40:17 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-49-ka-97-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143524 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-10-21 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-10-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 49 KA 68/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-49-ka-68-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:40:15 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:40:15 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-49-ka-68-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143521 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-10-21 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-10-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 49 KA 139/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-49-ka-139-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:40:13 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:40:13 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-49-ka-139-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140294 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-10-20 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-10-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 22 R 1146/14 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-22-r-1146-14 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:17:33 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:17:33 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-22-r-1146-14/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130723 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-10-20 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-10-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 SB 129/22 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-sb-129-22-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:08:48 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:08:48 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-sb-129-22-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128307 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-10-20 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-10-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 29 AS 620/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-29-as-620-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:38:29 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:38:29 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-29-as-620-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87852 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-10-20 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-10-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 1 KR 14/21 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-1-kr-14-21-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:12:35 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:12:35 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-1-kr-14-21-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87851 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-10-20 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-10-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 8 SO 13/20 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-8-so-13-20-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:12:33 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:12:33 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-8-so-13-20-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87850 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-10-20 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-10-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 3 KS 1/21 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-3-ks-1-21-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:12:32 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:12:32 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-3-ks-1-21-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87849 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-10-20 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-10-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 3 KR 5/21 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-3-kr-5-21-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:12:31 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:12:31 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-3-kr-5-21-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87848 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-10-20 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-10-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 3 KR 1/22 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-3-kr-1-22-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:12:29 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:12:29 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-3-kr-1-22-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140292 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-10-19 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-10-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 21 BA 9/21 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-21-ba-9-21-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:17:31 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:17:31 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-21-ba-9-21-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 147962 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-10-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-10-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 AS 1200/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-as-1200-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:27:53 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:27:53 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-as-1200-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 147958 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-10-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-10-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 15 SB 242/22 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-15-sb-242-22-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:27:50 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:27:50 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-15-sb-242-22-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 147953 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-10-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-10-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 KR 262/21 KH [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-kr-262-21-kh [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:27:48 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:27:48 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-kr-262-21-kh/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 147949 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-10-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-10-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 KA 61/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-ka-61-18-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:27:45 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:27:45 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-ka-61-18-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 147948 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-10-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-10-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 KA 61/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-ka-61-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:27:45 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:27:45 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-ka-61-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 147942 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-10-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-10-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 19 AS 1224/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-19-as-1224-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:27:41 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:27:41 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-19-as-1224-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 139266 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-10-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-10-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 3 P 26/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-3-p-26-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:07:55 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:07:55 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-3-p-26-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160840 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-10-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-10-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 R 186/22 ZV [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-r-186-22-zv [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:28:02 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:28:02 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-r-186-22-zv/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 157937 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-10-21 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-10-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 U 1019/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-u-1019-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:51:16 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:51:16 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-u-1019-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 3fa1aa1ed456fb75429d4895293e74f5 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:f1016d53ec0bd99218a1844f9579b3bb:0.51676100 1748503323 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.