| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 4 R 1178/18 ZV | 29.03.0022 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 R 180/22 ZV | 06.10.2022 | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 17. Oktober 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 24 R 855/18 ZV | 21.03.2022 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 R 172/22 ZV | 06.10.2022 | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 17. Oktober 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 4 R 1361/18 ZV | 03.03.2022 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 R 139/22 ZV | 06.10.2022 | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 17. Oktober 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 4 R 1361/18 ZV | 03.03.2022 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 R 139/22 ZV | 06.10.2022 | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 17. Oktober 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Schleswig | S 4 SF 10086/21 | 22.06.2022 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 SF 60/22 B E | 11.08.2022 | - | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | 17. Oktober 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Kiel | S 44 KR 658/19 | 06.07.2020 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 KR 166/20 | 24.08.2022 | - | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | 17. Oktober 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Ulm | S 2 U 4102/14 | 21.11.2017 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 10 U 341/18 | 23.06.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 14. Oktober 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Reutlingen | S 6 U 289/17 | 03.07.2019 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 10 U 2749/19 | 29.09.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 14. Oktober 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Detmold | S 8 SB 924/17 | 14.09.2021 | - | - | Sozialgericht Detmold | 14. Oktober 2022 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Kiel | S 35 AS 55/22 ER | 02.08.2022 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 6 AS 87/22 B ER | 11.10.2022 | - | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | 13. Oktober 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Kiel | S 2 KA 349/14 | 12.12.2017 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 KA 24/18 | 29.03.2022 | - | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | 13. Oktober 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Lübeck | S 2 KA 73/17 | 21.08.2019 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 KA 42/19 | 29.03.2022 | - | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | 13. Oktober 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Lübeck | S 19 KR 1259/18 | 25.02.2020 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 10 KR 82/20 | 26.04.2022 | - | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | 13. Oktober 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Itzehoe | S 33 KR 83/17 | 21.03.2018 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 10 BA 2/18 | 24.05.2022 | - | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | 13. Oktober 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Itzehoe | S 15 SO 237/14 | 21.03.2018 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 9 SO 58/18 | 15.06.2022 | - | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | 13. Oktober 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Kiel | S 36 AS 6/22 ER | 23.04.2022 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 6 AS 39/22 B ER | 12.07.2022 | - | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | 13. Oktober 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Köln | S 11 AS 4749/17 | 25.08.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 7 AS 1715/20 | 13.07.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 13. Oktober 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Köln | S 11 AS 1631/19 | 25.08.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 7 AS 1724/20 | 15.07.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 4 AS 98/22 B | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 13. Oktober 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Köln | S 20 AS 4379/19 | 21.01.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 2 AS 215/20 | 09.08.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 13. Oktober 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 35 AS 279/22 ER | 25.02.2022 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 6 AS 331/22 B ER, L 6 AS 332/22 B | 22.08.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 13. Oktober 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Detmold | S 22 R 1146/14 | 12.08.2015 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 8 BA 188/21 | 29.06.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 13. Oktober 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Detmold | S 11 R 612/21 | 24.08.2022 | - | - | Sozialgericht Detmold | 13. Oktober 2022 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Darmstadt | S 21 AS 1018/16 | 04.12.2019 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 6 AS 1/20 | 01.12.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | B 4 AS 4/22 R | - | Sozialgericht Darmstadt | 13. Oktober 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Darmstadt | S 10 KR 498/17 | 15.09.2021 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 1 KR 446/21 | 20.01.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 24/22 B | 23.08.2022 | Sozialgericht Darmstadt | 13. Oktober 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Darmstadt | S 10 KR 498/17 | 15.09.2021 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 1 KR 446/21 | 20.01.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 24/22 B | 23.08.2022 | Sozialgericht Darmstadt | 13. Oktober 2022 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 188 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 188 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 188 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 4675, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160836 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-10-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-10-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 R 180/22 ZV [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-r-180-22-zv [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:27:58 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:27:58 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-r-180-22-zv/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160832 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-10-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-10-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 R 172/22 ZV [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-r-172-22-zv [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:27:55 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:27:55 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-r-172-22-zv/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160829 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-10-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-10-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 R 139/22 ZV [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-r-139-22-zv-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:27:52 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:27:52 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-r-139-22-zv-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160828 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-10-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-10-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 R 139/22 ZV [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-r-139-22-zv [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:27:52 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:27:52 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-r-139-22-zv/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150412 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-10-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-10-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 SG 60/22 B E [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-sg-60-22-b-e [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:50:34 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:50:34 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-sg-60-22-b-e/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150409 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-10-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-10-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KR 166/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-kr-166-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:50:32 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:50:32 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-kr-166-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 157924 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-10-14 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-10-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 U 341/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-u-341-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:51:08 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:51:08 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-u-341-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 157920 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-10-14 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-10-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 U 2749/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-u-2749-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:51:05 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:51:05 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-u-2749-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140289 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-10-14 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-10-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 8 SB 924/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-8-sb-924-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:17:29 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:17:29 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-8-sb-924-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150406 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-10-13 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-10-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 AS 87/22 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-as-87-22-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:50:30 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:50:30 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-as-87-22-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150403 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-10-13 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-10-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 KA 24/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-ka-24-18-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:50:27 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:50:27 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-ka-24-18-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150399 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-10-13 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-10-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 KA 42/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-ka-42-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:50:25 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:50:25 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-ka-42-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150394 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-10-13 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-10-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 KR 82/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-kr-82-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:50:22 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:50:22 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-kr-82-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150389 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-10-13 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-10-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 BA 2/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-ba-2-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:50:19 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:50:19 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-ba-2-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150385 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-10-13 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-10-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 SO 58/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-so-58-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:50:17 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:50:17 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-so-58-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150380 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-10-13 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-10-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 AS 39/22 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-as-39-22-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:50:13 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:50:13 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-as-39-22-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 147937 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-10-13 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-10-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 AS 1715/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-as-1715-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:27:39 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:27:39 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-as-1715-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 147932 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-10-13 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-10-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 AS 1724/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-as-1724-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:27:36 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:27:36 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-as-1724-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 147926 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-10-13 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-10-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 AS 215/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-as-215-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:27:33 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:27:33 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-as-215-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 147921 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-10-13 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-10-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 AS 331/22 B ER, L 6 AS 332/22 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-as-331-22-b-er-l-6-as-332-22-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:27:31 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:27:31 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-as-331-22-b-er-l-6-as-332-22-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 147916 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-10-13 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-10-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 BA 188/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-ba-188-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:27:28 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:27:28 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-ba-188-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140287 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-10-13 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-10-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 11 R 612/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-11-r-612-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:17:27 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:17:27 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-11-r-612-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 136773 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-10-13 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-10-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 21 AS 1018/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-21-as-1018-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:40:56 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:40:56 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-21-as-1018-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 136769 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-10-13 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-10-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 10 KR 498/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-10-kr-498-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:40:55 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:40:55 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-10-kr-498-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 136764 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-10-13 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-10-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 446/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-446-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:40:53 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:40:53 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-446-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160836 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-10-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-10-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 R 180/22 ZV [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-r-180-22-zv [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:27:58 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:27:58 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-r-180-22-zv/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => bef7850a774db412c42ca79a3a7fb8b6 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:b46f1fd327386340673c40c9de01bd5a:0.13417300 1749300238 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.