Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | S 30 SB 1344/20 | 28.12.2022 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 13 SB 37/23 | 10.05.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 4. Oktober 2024 | ||
S 25 AS 3990/08 | 04.06.2015 | L 2 AS 462/15 | 06.03.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 2. Oktober 2024 | ||||
Sozialgericht Halle (Saale) | S 21 U 76/16 | 22.01.2019 | L 6 U 10/19 | 15.02.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 2. Oktober 2024 | |||
Sozialgericht Halle (Saale) | S 13 R 372/19 | 21.10.2021 | L 3 R 365/21 | 13.10.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 2. Oktober 2024 | |||
Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 10 U 02817/99 | 06.07.2001 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 2 U 4702/01 | 17.12.2001 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 2. Oktober 2024 | ||
Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 4 KA 6549/17 | 07.01.2020 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 5 KA 743/20 | 17.05.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 2. Oktober 2024 | ||
Sozialgericht Mannheim | S 12 AS 1050/20 | 06.07.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 2 AS 2600/21 | 31.05.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 2. Oktober 2024 | ||
Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 13 R 3060/21 | 30.06.2023 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 2 R 2395/23 | 12.02.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 2. Oktober 2024 | ||
Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 10 SO 1590/24 ER | 08.07.2024 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 2 SO 2360/24 ER-B | 13.08.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 2. Oktober 2024 | ||
Sozialgericht Heilbronn | S 3 SO 1503/24 ER | 24.07.2024 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 2 SO 2324/24 ER-B | 10.09.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 2. Oktober 2024 | ||
Sozialgericht Landshut | S 7 AS 356/22 | 19.02.2024 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 16 SF 210/24 AB | 25.09.2024 | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 1. Oktober 2024 | ||
Sozialgericht Dessau-Roßlau | S 30 AS 197/24 ER | 25.06.2024 | L 4 AS 212/24 B ER | 27.08.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 30. September 2024 | |||
Sozialgericht Magdeburg | S 14 AS 740/13 | 25.08.2016 | L 5 AS 578/16 | 26.10.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 30. September 2024 | |||
Sozialgericht Dessau-Roßlau | S 23 U 9/20 | 20.07.2022 | L 6 U 46/22 | 10.04.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 30. September 2024 | |||
Sozialgericht Magdeburg | S 20 AS 73/17 | 26.05.2020 | L 5 AS 353/20 | 22.08.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 30. September 2024 | |||
Sozialgericht Magdeburg | S 25 KR 105/15 | 08.12.2020 | L 6 KR 129/20 | 12.10.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 30. September 2024 | |||
Sozialgericht Halle (Saale) | S 21 P 27/20 | 07.02.2022 | L 1 P 2/22 | 12.07.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 30. September 2024 | |||
Sozialgericht Magdeburg | S 20 AS 1319/19 | 03.07.2020 | L 5 AS 326/20 | 29.04.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 30. September 2024 | |||
Sozialgericht Halle (Saale) | S 25 AS 5192/09 | 04.06.2015 | L 2 AS 467/15 | 06.03.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Sachsen-Anhalt | 30. September 2024 | |||
Sozialgericht Marburg | S 12 KA 75/23 | 18.09.2024 | - | - | Sozialgericht Marburg | 30. September 2024 | ||||
Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 12 AY 2449/24 ER | 25.09.2024 | - | - | Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | 30. September 2024 | ||||
Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 26 AS 1393/19 | 20.06.2022 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 AS 429/22 | 05.07.2024 | Bundessozialgericht | B 7 AS 83/24 | - | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 30. September 2024 |
Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 1 U 1661/18 | 10.05.2019 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 6 U 1890/19 | 29.06.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 27. September 2024 | ||
Sozialgericht Osnabrück | S 1 R 62/21 | 19.07.2023 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 2/1 R 204/23 | 05.06.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 27. September 2024 | ||
Sozialgericht Würzburg | S 18 AY 58/22 | 20.01.2023 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 AY 7/23 | 31.05.2023 | Bundessozialgericht | B 8 AY 6/23 R | 25.07.2024 | Bundessozialgericht | 27. September 2024 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 19 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 19 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 19 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 450, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150901 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-10-04 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-10-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 13 SB 37/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-13-sb-37-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:59:02 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:59:02 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-13-sb-37-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161855 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-10-02 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-10-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 AS 462/15 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-as-462-15 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:59:24 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:59:24 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-as-462-15/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161854 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-10-02 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-10-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 U 10/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-u-10-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:59:21 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:59:21 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-u-10-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161853 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-10-02 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-10-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 R 365/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-r-365-21-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:59:19 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:59:19 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-r-365-21-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161008 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-10-02 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-10-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 U 4702/01 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-u-4702-01 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:31:03 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:31:03 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-u-4702-01/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161005 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-10-02 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-10-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KA 743/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-ka-743-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:30:59 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:30:59 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-ka-743-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161003 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-10-02 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-10-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 AS 2600/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-as-2600-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:30:55 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:30:55 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-as-2600-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161001 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-10-02 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-10-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 R 2395/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-r-2395-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:30:53 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:30:53 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-r-2395-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160999 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-10-02 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-10-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 SO 2360/24 ER-B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-so-2360-24-er-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:30:51 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:30:51 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-so-2360-24-er-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160997 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-10-02 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-10-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 SO 2324/24 ER-B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-so-2324-24-er-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:30:49 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:30:49 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-so-2324-24-er-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130911 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-10-01 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-10-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 16 SF 210/24 AB [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-16-sf-210-24-ab [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:14:26 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:14:26 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-16-sf-210-24-ab/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161852 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-09-30 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-09-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 AS 212/24 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-as-212-24-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:59:17 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:59:17 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-as-212-24-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161851 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-09-30 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-09-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 AS 578/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-as-578-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:59:14 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:59:14 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-as-578-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161850 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-09-30 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-09-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 U 46/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-u-46-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:59:12 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:59:12 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-u-46-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161849 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-09-30 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-09-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 AS 353/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-as-353-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:59:10 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:59:10 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-as-353-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161848 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-09-30 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-09-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 KR 129/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-kr-129-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:59:07 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:59:07 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-kr-129-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161847 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-09-30 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-09-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 P 2/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-p-2-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:59:05 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:59:05 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-p-2-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161846 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-09-30 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-09-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 AS 326/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-as-326-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:59:02 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:59:02 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-as-326-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161845 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-09-30 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-09-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 AS 467/15 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-as-467-15 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:59:00 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:59:00 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-as-467-15/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150158 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-09-30 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-09-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 12 KA 75/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-12-ka-75-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:47:51 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:47:51 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-12-ka-75-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140144 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-09-30 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-09-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 12 AY 2449/24 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-12-ay-2449-24-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:15:24 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:15:24 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-12-ay-2449-24-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130581 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-09-30 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-09-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 AS 429/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-as-429-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:04:37 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:04:37 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-as-429-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160995 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-09-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-09-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 U 1890/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-u-1890-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:30:46 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:30:46 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-u-1890-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 139637 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-09-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-09-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2/1 R 204/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-1-r-204-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:10:22 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:10:22 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-1-r-204-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 88155 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-09-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-09-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 8 AY 6/23 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-8-ay-6-23-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:22:06 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:22:06 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-8-ay-6-23-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150901 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-10-04 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-10-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 13 SB 37/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-13-sb-37-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:59:02 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:59:02 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-13-sb-37-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 5fbfd00e2c508bd80c422d98d4f79384 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:fda9981c7d054f8c56174cce609961d2:0.48909300 1745100918 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.