| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Trier | S 5 KR 199/18 | 08.07.2019 | Landessozialgericht Rheinland-Pfalz | L 5 KR 145/19 | 19.12.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 20/21 R | 26.04.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | 13. Oktober 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Marburg | S 17 KA 344/22 ER | 19.08.2022 | - | - | Sozialgericht Marburg | 12. Oktober 2022 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Kassel | S 9 R 233/20 | 08.07.2021 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 R 187/21 | 23.05.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 5 R 128/22 B | 12.09.2022 | Sozialgericht Kassel | 12. Oktober 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Kassel | S 9 R 233/20 | 08.07.2021 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 R 187/21 | 23.05.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 5 R 128/22 B | 12.09.2022 | Sozialgericht Kassel | 12. Oktober 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Mannheim | S 8 U 1989/18 | 23.06.2020 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 1 U 3333/20 | 07.02.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 11. Oktober 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 5 KR 2429/20 | 08.12.2020 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 5 KR 4038/20 | 23.02.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 11. Oktober 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 17 R 3493/20 | 21.09.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 13 R 3103/21 | 08.03.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 11. Oktober 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Reutlingen | S 4 AS 230/20 | 21.07.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 13 AS 2798/21 | 16.12.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 11. Oktober 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 13 U 3817/21 | 08.02.2022 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 9 U 707/22 | 17.05.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 11. Oktober 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Heilbronn | S 4 U 1656/20 | 21.10.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 1 U 3357/21 | 02.05.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 11. Oktober 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Marburg | S 17 KA 282/19 und S 17 KA 391/19 ER | 29.09.2022 | - | - | Sozialgericht Marburg | 11. Oktober 2022 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 20 SB 1587/10 | 09.12.2017 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 13 SB 162/18 | 19.05.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 11. Oktober 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 8 KR 376/15 | 30.09.2016 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 11 KR 843/16 | 21.07.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 KR 1/22 B | 01.08.2022 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 11. Oktober 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Duisburg | S 37 R 789/14 | 28.03.2018 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 14 R 280/18 | 23.04.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | B 5 R 7/22 R | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 11. Oktober 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Marburg | S 4 P 14/18 | 14.02.2020 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 6 P 10/20 | 12.11.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | B 3 P 4/22 R | - | Sozialgericht Marburg | 10. Oktober 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Marburg | S 4 P 14/18 | 14.02.2020 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 6 P 10/20 | 12.11.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | B 3 P 4/22 R | - | Sozialgericht Marburg | 10. Oktober 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 23 U 162/15 | 17.10.2019 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 U 211/19 | 30.08.2022 | - | Sozialgericht Frankfurt | 10. Oktober 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 23 U 162/15 | 17.10.2019 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 U 211/19 | 30.08.2022 | - | Sozialgericht Frankfurt | 10. Oktober 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Darmstadt | S 21 AS 1018/16 | 04.12.2019 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 6 AS 1/20 | 01.12.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | B 4 AS 4/22 R | 06.06.2023 | Sozialgericht Darmstadt | 10. Oktober 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Fulda | S 8 U 67/19 | 02.11.2020 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 U 209/20 | 30.08.2022 | - | Sozialgericht Fulda | 10. Oktober 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Nordhausen | S 13 AS 842/21 | 06.09.2022 | - | - | Sozialgericht Nordhausen | 10. Oktober 2022 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Nordhausen | S 13 AS 120/21 | 06.09.2022 | - | - | Sozialgericht Nordhausen | 10. Oktober 2022 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Heilbronn | S 9 KR 3859/18 | 22.10.2020 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 4 KR 3763/20 | 23.09.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 7. Oktober 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | S 18 R 253/22 | 15.06.2022 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 21 R 535/22 | 05.08.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 7. Oktober 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 20 R 1700/15 | 02.03.2017 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 3 R 204/17 | 11.05.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 7. Oktober 2022 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 190 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 190 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 190 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 4725, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87828 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-10-13 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-10-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 1 KR 20/21 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-1-kr-20-21-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:11:57 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:11:57 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-1-kr-20-21-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149745 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-10-12 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-10-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 17 KA 344/22 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-17-ka-344-22-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:44:04 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:44:04 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-17-ka-344-22-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 139259 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-10-12 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-10-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 9 R 233/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-9-r-233-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:07:53 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:07:53 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-9-r-233-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 139253 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-10-12 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-10-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 R 187/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-r-187-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:07:50 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:07:50 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-r-187-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 157916 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-10-11 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-10-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 U 3333/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-u-3333-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:51:03 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:51:03 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-u-3333-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 157912 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-10-11 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-10-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KR 4038/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-kr-4038-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:51:00 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:51:00 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-kr-4038-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 157908 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-10-11 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-10-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 13 R 3103/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-13-r-3103-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:50:58 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:50:58 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-13-r-3103-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 157905 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-10-11 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-10-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 13 AS 2798/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-13-as-2798-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:50:55 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:50:55 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-13-as-2798-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 157900 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-10-11 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-10-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 U 707/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-u-707-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:50:52 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:50:52 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-u-707-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 157896 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-10-11 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-10-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 U 3357/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-u-3357-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:50:49 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:50:49 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-u-3357-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149740 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-10-11 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-10-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 17 KA 282/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-17-ka-282-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:44:02 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:44:02 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-17-ka-282-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 147911 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-10-11 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-10-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 13 SB 162/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-13-sb-162-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:27:25 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:27:25 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-13-sb-162-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 147906 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-10-11 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-10-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 KR 843/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-kr-843-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:27:23 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:27:23 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-kr-843-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 147901 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-10-11 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-10-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 14 R 280/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-14-r-280-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:27:20 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:27:20 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-14-r-280-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149734 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-10-10 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-10-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 4 P 14/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-4-p-14-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:43:58 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:43:58 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-4-p-14-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149728 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-10-10 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-10-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 P 10/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-p-10-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:43:55 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:43:55 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-p-10-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 136889 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-10-10 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-10-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 23 U 162/15 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-23-u-162-15-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:41:39 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:41:39 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-23-u-162-15-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 136888 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-10-10 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-10-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 23 U 162/15 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-23-u-162-15 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:41:39 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:41:39 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-23-u-162-15/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 136759 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-10-10 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-10-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 AS 1/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-as-1-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:40:51 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:40:51 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-as-1-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134592 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-10-10 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-10-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 8 U 67/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-8-u-67-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:23:17 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:23:17 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-8-u-67-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 131898 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-10-10 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-10-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 13 AS 842/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-13-as-842-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:02:41 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:02:41 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-13-as-842-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 131894 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-10-10 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-10-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 13 AS 120/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-13-as-120-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:02:40 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:02:40 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-13-as-120-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 157892 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-10-07 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-10-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 KR 3763/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-kr-3763-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:50:47 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:50:47 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-kr-3763-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 147896 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-10-07 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-10-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 21 R 535/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-21-r-535-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:27:17 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:27:17 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-21-r-535-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 147891 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-10-07 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-10-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 R 204/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-r-204-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:27:15 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:27:15 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-r-204-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87828 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-10-13 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-10-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 1 KR 20/21 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-1-kr-20-21-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:11:57 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:11:57 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-1-kr-20-21-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 943aaeb7c5c302643b7dc93b57077c8f [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:7a3104ae43c8684aacb0e62592ee06e3:0.30599500 1748764949 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.