| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 16 KA 72/19 | 04.03.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 11 KA 17/20 | - | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 7. Oktober 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Detmold | S 21 BA 9/21 ER | 11.06.2021 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 8 BA 80/21 B ER | 13.07.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 7. Oktober 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 45 SB 2234/19 | 05.05.2021 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 6 SB 153/21 B | 30.06.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 7. Oktober 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 8 KR 5162/18 | 01.07.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 16 KR 487/20 | 12.05.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 KR 35/22 B | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 7. Oktober 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Heilbronn | S 14 KR 3452/19 | 27.04.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 4 KR 1915/21 NZB | 28.01.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 6. Oktober 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Ulm | S 3 U 2520/17 | 15.01.2020 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 12 U 1858/20 | 07.02.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 6. Oktober 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Konstanz | S 2 KR 1349/18 | 19.12.2019 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 4 KR 3498/20 | 28.01.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 6. Oktober 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 13 SB 513/16 | 27.07.2017 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 3 SB 3339/17 | 15.05.2019 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 6. Oktober 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Fulda | S 8 U 67/19 | 02.11.2020 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 U 209/20 | 30.08.2022 | - | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 6. Oktober 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Fulda | S 8 U 67/19 | 02.11.2020 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 U 209/20 | 30.08.2022 | - | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | 6. Oktober 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Köln | S 25 R 470/17 | 02.12.2019 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 2 R 38/20 | 28.07.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 5 R 100/22 AR | 14.10.2022 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 5. Oktober 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Bayreuth | S 17 U 5002/17 | 30.08.2019 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 17 U 285/19 | 02.06.2022 | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 5. Oktober 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Würzburg | S 9 AY 106/22 ER | 07.07.2022 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 AY 73/22 B ER | 06.09.2022 | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 5. Oktober 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | S 41 AS 2721/21 ER | 22.02.2022 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 7 AS 351/22 B ER | 12.07.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 4. Oktober 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 40 AS 2043/21 | 27.01.2022 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 2 AS 209/22 | 05.07.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 4. Oktober 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 45 R 2183/16 | 30.06.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 14 R 693/20 | 14.06.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 4. Oktober 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Münster | S 14 R 657/21 | 29.11.2021 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 14 R 126/22 | 18.03.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 4. Oktober 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Münster | S 14 R 655/21 | 29.11.2021 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 14 R 125/22 | 18.03.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 4. Oktober 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 21 AL 152/21 | 10.08.2022 | - | - | Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | 4. Oktober 2022 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 168 AS 3566/17 | 23.05.2017 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 29 AS 1321/17 | 25.08.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 4. Oktober 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Konstanz | S 7 AL 160/20 | 29.09.2020 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 12 AL 3151/20 | 24.01.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 30. September 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Ulm | S 3 AS 2285/21 ER | 09.11.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 12 AS 3572/21 ER-B | 04.02.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 30. September 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 14 P 1974/20 | 13.06.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 4 P 2064/21 | 28.01.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 30. September 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Konstanz | S 9 SB 2442/17 | 14.09.2020 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 6 SB 3312/20 | 15.09.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 30. September 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 25 VG 232/20 | 16.03.2022 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 6 VG 1148/22 | 15.09.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 30. September 2022 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 191 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 191 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 191 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 4750, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 147886 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-10-07 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-10-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 KA 17/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-ka-17-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:27:13 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:27:13 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-ka-17-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 147882 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-10-07 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-10-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 BA 80/21 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-ba-80-21-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:27:10 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:27:10 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-ba-80-21-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 147876 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-10-07 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-10-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 SB 153/21 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-sb-153-21-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:27:08 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:27:08 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-sb-153-21-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 147872 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-10-07 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-10-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 16 KR 487/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-16-kr-487-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:27:05 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:27:05 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-16-kr-487-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 157887 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-10-06 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-10-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 KR 1915/21 NZB [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-kr-1915-21-nzb [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:50:44 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:50:44 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-kr-1915-21-nzb/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 157883 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-10-06 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-10-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 12 U 1858/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-12-u-1858-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:50:40 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:50:40 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-12-u-1858-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 157879 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-10-06 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-10-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 KR 3498/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-kr-3498-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:50:37 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:50:37 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-kr-3498-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 157875 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-10-06 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-10-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 SB 3339/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-sb-3339-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:50:35 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:50:35 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-sb-3339-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130564 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-10-06 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-10-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 U 209/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-u-209-20-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:04:22 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:04:22 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-u-209-20-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130563 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-10-06 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-10-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 U 209/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-u-209-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:04:22 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:04:22 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-u-209-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 147868 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-10-05 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-10-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 R 38/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-r-38-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:27:03 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:27:03 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-r-38-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130722 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-10-05 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-10-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 17 U 285/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-17-u-285-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:08:46 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:08:46 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-17-u-285-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130721 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-10-05 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-10-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 AY 73/22 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-ay-73-22-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:08:43 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:08:43 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-ay-73-22-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 147863 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-10-04 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-10-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 AS 351/22 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-as-351-22-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:27:01 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:27:01 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-as-351-22-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 147857 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-10-04 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-10-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 AS 209/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-as-209-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:26:57 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:26:57 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-as-209-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 147852 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-10-04 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-10-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 14 R 693/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-14-r-693-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:26:55 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:26:55 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-14-r-693-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 147847 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-10-04 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-10-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 14 R 126/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-14-r-126-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:26:52 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:26:52 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-14-r-126-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 147842 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-10-04 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-10-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 14 R 125/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-14-r-125-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:26:49 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:26:49 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-14-r-125-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 144971 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-10-04 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-10-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 21 AL 152/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-21-al-152-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 03:00:51 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 02:00:51 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-21-al-152-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128288 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-10-04 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-10-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 29 AS 1321/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-29-as-1321-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:38:17 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:38:17 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-29-as-1321-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 157871 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-09-30 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-09-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 12 AL 3151/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-12-al-3151-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:50:33 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:50:33 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-12-al-3151-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 157868 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-09-30 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-09-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 12 AS 3572/21 ER-B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-12-as-3572-21-er-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:50:29 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:50:29 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-12-as-3572-21-er-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 157864 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-09-30 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-09-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 P 2064/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-p-2064-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:50:27 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:50:27 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-p-2064-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 157860 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-09-30 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-09-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 SB 3312/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-sb-3312-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:50:25 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:50:25 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-sb-3312-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 157856 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-09-30 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-09-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 VG 1148/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-vg-1148-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:50:22 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:50:22 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-vg-1148-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 147886 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-10-07 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-10-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 KA 17/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-ka-17-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:27:13 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:27:13 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-ka-17-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => e59da1fa3c208a45c89913f25fc39a1c [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:0582ab65646326313171fb98d4f433a4:0.40608300 1748764809 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.