| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Köln | S 7 AS 43/21 | 02.03.2021 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 7 AS 395/21 | 02.03.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 30. September 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Duisburg | S 44 KR 2251/18 | 25.09.2019 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 10 KR 852/19 | 19.01.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 23/22 B | 18.08.2022 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 30. September 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 78 KR 864/19 | 30.08.2021 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 10 KR 755/21 KH | 16.03.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 35/22 B | 18.08.2022 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 30. September 2022 |
| Sozialgericht München | S 40 AS 1478/21 | 07.09.2022 | - | - | Sozialgericht München | 30. September 2022 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 6 AY 3236/20 | 12.04.2022 | - | - | Sozialgericht Freiburg | 30. September 2022 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Münster | S 6 KR 2789/19 | 29.01.2021 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 10 KR 163/21 KH | 24.11.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 115/21 B | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 29. September 2022 |
| Sozialgericht München | S 44 KR 1013/18 | 02.04.2019 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 KR 307/19 | 03.03.2022 | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 29. September 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 25 KR 236/14 | 31.08.2016 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 1 KR 247/16 | 09.03.2022 | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 28. September 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Duisburg | S 29 U 484/20 | 15.07.2021 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 10 U 420/21 | 06.04.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 54/22 B | 18.08.2022 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 28. September 2022 |
| Sozialgericht München | S 60 KR 1658/19 | 21.07.2021 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 KR 496/21 | 08.09.2022 | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 28. September 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht München | S 18 KR 4412/18 | 08.06.2021 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 KR 366/21 | 13.07.2022 | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 28. September 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 168 AS 20147/13 | 20.01.2018 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 1 AS 401/18 | 24.08.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 28. September 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Mannheim | S 8 R 928/18 | 14.02.2020 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 4 R 1101/20 | 29.04.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 27. September 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Heilbronn | S 3 R 3220/18 | 04.12.2020 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 5 R 203/21 | 28.01.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 27. September 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 14 R 2042/17 | 09.05.2018 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 5 R 3521/21 | 02.02.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 27. September 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Heilbronn | S 8 AS 1380/20 | 03.08.2020 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 13 AS 2544/20 | 05.04.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 27. September 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Heilbronn | S 8 AS 2326/19 | 11.12.2020 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 13 AS 328/21 | 05.04.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 27. September 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Konstanz | S 5 U 2590/16 | 18.12.2019 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 12 U 249/20 | 24.01.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 27. September 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Ulm | S 7 U 443/17 | 09.07.2019 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 12 U 3131/19 | 24.01.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 27. September 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Konstanz | S 7 KR 2871/18 | 16.11.2020 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 11 KR 4146/20 | 25.01.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 27. September 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 6 R 2866/19 | 08.06.2020 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 13 R 1963/20 | 08.02.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 27. September 2022 | ||
| Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 11 SF 114/20 EK U | 16.02.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 10 ÜG 7/22 B | - | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 27. September 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Münster | S 9 KR 932/20 ER | 18.12.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 5 KR 36/21 B ER | 23.02.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 27. September 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | S 53 SF 8/22 E | 20.05.2022 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 7 AS 952/22 B | 11.07.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 27. September 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Aachen | S 6 BA 17/20 ER | 14.10.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 8 BA 181/20 B ER | 03.03.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 27. September 2022 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 192 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 192 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 192 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 4775, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 147837 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-09-30 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-09-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 AS 395/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-as-395-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:26:47 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:26:47 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-as-395-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 147832 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-09-30 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-09-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 KR 852/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-kr-852-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:26:45 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:26:45 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-kr-852-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 147828 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-09-30 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-09-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 KR 755/21 KH [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-kr-755-21-kh [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:26:42 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:26:42 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-kr-755-21-kh/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143519 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-09-30 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-09-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 40 AS 1478/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-40-as-1478-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:40:11 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:40:11 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-40-as-1478-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 133157 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-09-30 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-09-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 6 AY 3236/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-6-ay-3236-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:11:49 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:11:49 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-6-ay-3236-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 147823 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-09-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-09-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 KR 163/21 KH [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-kr-163-21-kh [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:26:39 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:26:39 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-kr-163-21-kh/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130720 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-09-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-09-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 KR 307/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-kr-307-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:08:42 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:08:42 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-kr-307-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160825 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-09-28 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-09-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 247/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-247-16-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:27:49 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:27:49 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-247-16-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 147818 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-09-28 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-09-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 U 420/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-u-420-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:26:37 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:26:37 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-u-420-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130719 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-09-28 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-09-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 KR 496/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-kr-496-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:08:40 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:08:40 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-kr-496-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130718 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-09-28 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-09-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 KR 366/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-kr-366-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:08:39 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:08:39 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-kr-366-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128285 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-09-28 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-09-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 AS 401/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-as-401-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:38:15 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:38:15 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-as-401-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 157852 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-09-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-09-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 R 1101/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-r-1101-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:50:20 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:50:20 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-r-1101-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 157847 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-09-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-09-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 R 203/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-r-203-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:50:16 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:50:16 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-r-203-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 157843 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-09-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-09-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 R 3521/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-r-3521-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:50:14 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:50:14 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-r-3521-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 157839 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-09-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-09-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 13 AS 2544/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-13-as-2544-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:50:12 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:50:12 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-13-as-2544-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 157835 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-09-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-09-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 13 AS 328/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-13-as-328-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:50:09 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:50:09 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-13-as-328-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 157831 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-09-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-09-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 12 U 249/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-12-u-249-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:50:07 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:50:07 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-12-u-249-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 157827 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-09-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-09-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 12 U 3131/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-12-u-3131-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:50:05 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:50:05 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-12-u-3131-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 157823 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-09-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-09-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 KR 4146/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-kr-4146-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:50:02 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:50:02 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-kr-4146-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 157820 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-09-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-09-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 13 R 1963/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-13-r-1963-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:49:59 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:49:59 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-13-r-1963-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 147812 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-09-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-09-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 SF 114/20 EK U [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-sf-114-20-ek-u [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:26:34 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:26:34 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-sf-114-20-ek-u/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 147806 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-09-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-09-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KR 36/21 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-kr-36-21-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:26:31 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:26:31 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-kr-36-21-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 147800 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-09-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-09-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 AS 952/22 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-as-952-22-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:26:27 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:26:27 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-as-952-22-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 147795 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-09-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-09-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 BA 181/20 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-ba-181-20-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:26:25 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:26:25 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-ba-181-20-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 147837 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-09-30 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-09-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 AS 395/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-as-395-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:26:47 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:26:47 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-as-395-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 1ffccc23c9f95aea897956c30c86b270 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:9980cf948848cbec7d09d89f10bd212b:0.76331200 1748902954 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.