| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Detmold | S 9 SF 119/19 E | 04.02.2022 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 9 BK 6/22 B | 20.07.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 27. September 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 19 AS 378/22 ER | 10.03.2022 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 7 AS 389/22 B ER | 13.07.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 27. September 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 42 SO 74/16 | 20.03.2019 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 12 SO 227/19 | 23.03.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 8 SO 12/22 R | 17.05.2023 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 27. September 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Duisburg | S 10 R 276/15 | 07.02.2019 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 8 BA 78/19 | - | - | Sozialgericht Duisburg | 27. September 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Duisburg | S 10 R 698/16 WA | 26.08.2022 | - | - | Sozialgericht Duisburg | 27. September 2022 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Kassel | S 11 AL 47/21 | 12.08.2021 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 AL 193/21 | 16.09.2022 | - | Sozialgericht Kassel | 27. September 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Kassel | S 11 AL 47/21 | 12.08.2021 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 AL 193/21 | 16.09.2022 | - | Sozialgericht Kassel | 27. September 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht München | S 28 SF 602/17 E | 02.07.2018 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 12 SF 298/18 E | 29.08.2022 | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 27. September 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Ulm | S 5 KR 3069/19 | 16.10.2020 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 11 KR 3999/20 | 25.01.2022 | - | Bundessozialgericht | 27. September 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Köln | S 37 R 1621/17 | 27.05.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 3 R 554/20 | 10.11.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | B 5 R 27/22 B | 14.07.2022 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 26. September 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Altenburg | S 25 KG 578/21 | 03.03.2022 | - | - | Sozialgericht Altenburg | 26. September 2022 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 15 R 1975/14 | 11.10.2016 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 3 R 1071/16 | 06.04.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 23. September 2022 | ||
| Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 8 BA 19/22 ER | 02.03.2022 | - | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 23. September 2022 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Köln | S 33 BA 157/20 ER | 12.10.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 8 BA 173/20 B ER | 20.04.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 23. September 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | S 46 KR 2242/19 | 13.05.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 5 KR 347/20 | 05.05.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 59/22 B | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 23. September 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Köln | S 10 SO 12/20 | 18.11.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 9 SO 388/20 | 30.06.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 23. September 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht München | S 38 KA 111/20 | 23.06.2022 | - | - | Sozialgericht München | 23. September 2022 | ||||
| Sozialgericht München | S 38 KA 145/21 | 23.06.2022 | - | - | Sozialgericht München | 23. September 2022 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Hannover | S 24 KA 169/17 | 26.06.2019 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 3 KA 46/19 | 25.05.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 23. September 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Hannover | S 22 U 77/19 | 16.11.2020 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 3 U 177/20 | 27.04.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 23. September 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Lüneburg | 11 VE 6/19 | 10.03.2021 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 7 KO 4/21 (VE) | 16.06.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 23. September 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Oldenburg | S 13 VJ 16/15 | 03.06.2020 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 10 VE 47/20 | 30.06.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 23. September 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Oldenburg | S 81 R 22/17 | 20.11.2019 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 12 BA 29/19 | 28.04.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 23. September 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 24 R 594/18 ZV | 21.03.2022 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 R 148/22 ZV | 08.09.2022 | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 21. September 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 4 R 555/18 ZV | 15.03.2022 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 R 144/22 ZV | 08.09.2022 | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 21. September 2022 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 193 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 193 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 193 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 4800, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 147789 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-09-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-09-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 BK 6/22 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-bk-6-22-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:26:22 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:26:22 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-bk-6-22-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 147784 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-09-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-09-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 AS 389/22 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-as-389-22-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:26:19 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:26:19 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-as-389-22-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 147779 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-09-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-09-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 12 SO 227/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-12-so-227-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:26:17 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:26:17 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-12-so-227-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143424 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-09-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-09-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 10 R 276/15 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-10-r-276-15 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:39:25 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:39:25 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-10-r-276-15/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143419 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-09-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-09-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 10 R 698/16 WA [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-10-r-698-16-wa [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:39:23 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:39:23 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-10-r-698-16-wa/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 139248 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-09-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-09-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 11 AL 47/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-11-al-47-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:07:48 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:07:48 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-11-al-47-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 139244 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-09-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-09-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 AL 193/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-al-193-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:07:47 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:07:47 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-al-193-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130717 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-09-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-09-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 12 SF 298/18 E [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-12-sf-298-18-e [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:08:37 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:08:37 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-12-sf-298-18-e/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87827 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-09-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-09-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 KR 3999/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-kr-3999-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:11:55 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:11:55 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-kr-3999-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 147774 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-09-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-09-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 R 554/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-r-554-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:26:14 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:26:14 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-r-554-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 132192 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-09-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-09-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 25 KG 578/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-25-kg-578-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:04:40 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:04:40 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-25-kg-578-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 147768 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-09-23 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-09-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 R 1071/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-r-1071-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:26:11 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:26:11 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-r-1071-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 147762 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-09-23 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-09-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 BA 19/22 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-ba-19-22-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:26:08 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:26:08 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-ba-19-22-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 147757 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-09-23 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-09-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 BA 173/20 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-ba-173-20-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:26:05 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:26:05 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-ba-173-20-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 147752 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-09-23 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-09-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KR 347/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-kr-347-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:26:02 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:26:02 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-kr-347-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 147747 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-09-23 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-09-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 SO 388/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-so-388-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:25:59 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:25:59 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-so-388-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143516 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-09-23 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-09-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 38 KA 111/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-38-ka-111-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:40:10 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:40:10 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-38-ka-111-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143513 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-09-23 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-09-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 38 KA 145/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-38-ka-145-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:40:08 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:40:08 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-38-ka-145-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 138324 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-09-23 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-09-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 KA 46/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-ka-46-19-4 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:02:03 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:02:03 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-ka-46-19-4/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 138320 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-09-23 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-09-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 U 177/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-u-177-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:02:01 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:02:01 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-u-177-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 138315 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-09-23 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-09-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 KO 4/21 (VE) [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-ko-4-21-ve [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:02:00 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:02:00 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-ko-4-21-ve/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 138310 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-09-23 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-09-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 VE 47/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-ve-47-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:01:58 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:01:58 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-ve-47-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 138305 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-09-23 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-09-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 12 BA 29/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-12-ba-29-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:01:56 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:01:56 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-12-ba-29-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160822 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-09-21 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-09-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 R 148/22 ZV [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-r-148-22-zv [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:27:47 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:27:47 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-r-148-22-zv/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160819 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-09-21 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-09-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 R 144/22 ZV [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-r-144-22-zv [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:27:44 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:27:44 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-r-144-22-zv/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 147789 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-09-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-09-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 BK 6/22 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-bk-6-22-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:26:22 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:26:22 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-bk-6-22-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 8680300cde5d293c9bf9b7d137c01d4d [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:2f0db77846fb0a590635688b8491197e:0.55887600 1748903018 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.