| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 34 R 266/18 ZV | 11.02.2022 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 R 119/22 ZV | 08.09.2022 | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 21. September 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 4 R 1325/18 ZV | 09.02.2022 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 R 113/22 ZV | 08.09.2022 | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 21. September 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Chemnitz | S 4 R 1182/18 ZV | 07.02.2022 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 R 108/22 ZV | 08.09.2022 | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 21. September 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Chemnitz | S 13 RS 669/17 | 28.01.2022 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 R 102/22 ZV | 08.09.2022 | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 21. September 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Leipzig | S 11 R 623/19 ZV | 02.11.2021 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 R 31/22 ZV | 08.09.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 5 RS 4/22 B | 07.09.2023 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 21. September 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 30 KR 645/18 | 05.12.2019 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 1 KR 293/21 | 26.01.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 3 KR 19/22 B | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 21. September 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Leipzig | S 8 KR 1183/19 | 22.01.2020 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 1 KR 159/20 | 09.03.2022 | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 21. September 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt (Oder) | S 10 U 108/21 | 25.03.2022 | - | - | Sozialgericht Frankfurt (Oder) | 21. September 2022 | ||||
| - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 37 SF 131/21 EK SF | 01.09.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 10 ÜG 19/22 BH | 17.03.2023 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 21. September 2022 | ||
| - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 37 SF 216/20 EK AS | 06.05.2020 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 21. September 2022 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt (Oder) | S 43 KR 67/22 ER | 18.05.2022 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 28 KR 233/22 B ER | 05.08.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 21. September 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Chemnitz | S 14 AS 3396/17 | 02.11.2018 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 AS 1023/18 | 08.09.2022 | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 20. September 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 33 RS 1381/16 | 26.11.2019 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 R 773/19 ZV | 08.09.2022 | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 20. September 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Darmstadt | S 17 SO 191/19 ER | 30.03.2020 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 SO 91/20 B ER | 29.06.2020 | - | Sozialgericht Darmstadt | 20. September 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 56 KR 638/16 | 15.03.2018 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 4 BA 52/18 | 23.06.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 20. September 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 25 U 269/21 ER | 07.03.2022 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 3 U 34/22 B ER | 30.08.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 20. September 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 211 R 886/15 | 24.11.2017 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 4 BA 4/18 | 23.06.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 20. September 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 93 AS 14479/16 | 16.01.2020 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 4 AS 359/20 | 15.08.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 20. September 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 36 BA 104/21 ER | 25.05.2021 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 4 BA 28/21 B ER | 07.06.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 20. September 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Potsdam | S 2 U 17/19 | 16.09.2020 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 3 U 144/20 | 10.08.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 120/22 B | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 20. September 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Konstanz | S 1 U 452/22 | 16.09.2022 | - | - | Sozialgericht Konstanz | 19. September 2022 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 22 As 191/22 | 18.03.2022 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 3 AS 1169/22 | 20.07.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 16. September 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Landshut | S 10 KR 391/21 | 09.09.2022 | - | - | Sozialgericht Landshut | 16. September 2022 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Gießen | S 16 VG 1522/98 | 04.11.1999 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 VG 5/00 | 10.04.2001 | Bundessozialgericht | B 9 VG 4/01 | 24.07.2002 | Sozialgericht Gießen | 15. September 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Konstanz | S 8 SF 1275/21 AB | 18.06.2021 | - | - | Sozialgericht Konstanz | 15. September 2022 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 194 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 194 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 194 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 4825, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160814 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-09-21 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-09-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 R 119/22 ZV [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-r-119-22-zv [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:27:40 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:27:40 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-r-119-22-zv/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160811 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-09-21 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-09-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 R 113/22 ZV [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-r-113-22-zv [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:27:37 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:27:37 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-r-113-22-zv/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160808 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-09-21 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-09-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 R 108/22 ZV [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-r-108-22-zv [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:27:34 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:27:34 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-r-108-22-zv/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160805 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-09-21 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-09-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 R 102/22 ZV [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-r-102-22-zv [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:27:31 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:27:31 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-r-102-22-zv/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160802 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-09-21 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-09-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 R 31/22 ZV [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-r-31-22-zv [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:27:28 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:27:28 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-r-31-22-zv/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160798 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-09-21 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-09-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 293/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-293-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:27:24 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:27:24 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-293-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160795 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-09-21 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-09-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 159/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-159-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:27:22 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:27:22 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-159-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 131530 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-09-21 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-09-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 10 U 108/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-10-u-108-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 00:58:39 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 23:58:39 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-10-u-108-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128281 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-09-21 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-09-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 37 SF 131/21 EK SF [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-37-sf-131-21-ek-sf [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:38:13 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:38:13 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-37-sf-131-21-ek-sf/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128278 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-09-21 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-09-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 37 SF 216/20 EK AS [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-37-sf-216-20-ek-as [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:38:11 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:38:11 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-37-sf-216-20-ek-as/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128275 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-09-21 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-09-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 28 KR 233/22 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-28-kr-233-22-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:38:10 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:38:10 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-28-kr-233-22-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160792 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-09-20 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-09-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 AS 1023/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-as-1023-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:27:20 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:27:20 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-as-1023-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160789 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-09-20 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-09-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 R 773/19 ZV [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-r-773-19-zv [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:27:17 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:27:17 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-r-773-19-zv/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 136754 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-09-20 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-09-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 17 SO 191/19 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-17-so-191-19-er-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:40:50 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:40:50 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-17-so-191-19-er-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128272 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-09-20 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-09-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 BA 52/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-ba-52-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:38:08 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:38:08 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-ba-52-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128268 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-09-20 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-09-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 U 34/22 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-u-34-22-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:38:06 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:38:06 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-u-34-22-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128265 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-09-20 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-09-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 BA 4/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-ba-4-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:38:05 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:38:05 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-ba-4-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128263 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-09-20 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-09-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 AS 359/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-as-359-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:38:03 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:38:03 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-as-359-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128260 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-09-20 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-09-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 BA 28/21 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-ba-28-21-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:38:01 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:38:01 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-ba-28-21-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128257 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-09-20 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-09-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 U 144/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-u-144-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:38:00 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:38:00 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-u-144-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 131344 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-09-19 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-09-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 1 U 452/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-1-u-452-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 00:56:33 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 23:56:33 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-1-u-452-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 157816 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-09-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-09-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 AS 1169/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-as-1169-22-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:49:57 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:49:57 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-as-1169-22-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 133690 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-09-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-09-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 10 KR 391/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-10-kr-391-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:16:00 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:16:00 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-10-kr-391-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134942 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-09-15 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-09-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 16 VG 1522/98 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-16-vg-1522-98 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:27:08 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:27:08 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-16-vg-1522-98/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 131341 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-09-15 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-09-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 8 SF 1275/21 AB [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-8-sf-1275-21-ab [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 00:56:31 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 23:56:31 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-8-sf-1275-21-ab/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160814 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-09-21 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-09-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 R 119/22 ZV [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-r-119-22-zv [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:27:40 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:27:40 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-r-119-22-zv/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 83db6fbf9f28732ff6544a973900339e [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:887c6805018dc94bcaab4b04b5616ff3:0.17499600 1749048465 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.