| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Konstanz | S 3 SF 492/22 AB | 01.04.2022 | - | - | Sozialgericht Konstanz | 15. September 2022 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 8 AS 2272/22 ER | 28.05.2022 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 29 AS 520/22 B ER | 16.06.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 15. September 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 8 AS 2327/22 ER | 15.06.2022 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 27 AS 608/22 B ER | 18.07.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 15. September 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Cottbus | S 17 SB 23/18 | 18.05.2020 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 13 SB 129/20 | 26.07.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 15. September 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 104 AS 6467/19 | 15.12.2021 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 27 AS 1588/21 | 01.08.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 15. September 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 40 VS 162/19 | 27.11.2014 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 13 VS 2/15 | 23.06.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 15. September 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 40 VJ 49/07 | 10.05.2007 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 13 VJ 19/11 ZVW | 18.08.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 15. September 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 162 P 366/19 | 13.10.2020 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 30 P 69/20 | 14.07.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 3 P 5/22 BH | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 15. September 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Cottbus | S 40 AS 1068/21 | 01.04.2022 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 20 AS 451/22 B PKH | 23.08.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 15. September 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Landshut | S 16 AL 135/20 | 18.07.2022 | - | - | Sozialgericht Landshut | 14. September 2022 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 16 R 1479/22 | 02.08.2022 | - | - | Sozialgericht Freiburg | 14. September 2022 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 83 KA 153/17 | 13.03.2019 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 7 KA 27/19 | 18.05.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 6 KA 21/22 B | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 14. September 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 83 KA 90/19 | 19.02.2020 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 7 KA 12/20 | 18.05.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 14. September 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Potsdam | S 15 KR 642/17 | 21.09.2020 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 9 KR 392/20 | 26.04.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 43/22 B | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 14. September 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 28 KR 1074/16 | 24.03.2017 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 9 KR 226/20 WA | 15.06.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 14. September 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 87 KA 55/18 | 16.11.2020 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 7 KA 43/20 | 06.04.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 6 KA 18/22 B | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 14. September 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Nürnberg | S 18 P 55/19 | 05.11.2019 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 P 78/19 | 21.05.2021 | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 13. September 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Marburg | S 12 KA 422/20 | 12.05.2021 | - | - | Sozialgericht Marburg | 12. September 2022 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 10 SO 2576/21 | 27.07.2022 | - | - | Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | 12. September 2022 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Konstanz | S 6 U 1422/15 | 13.11.2018 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 12 U 4390/18 | 03.09.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 9. September 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Ulm | S 9 SB 408/20 | 01.10.2020 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 6 SB 3190/20 | 22.07.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 9. September 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Reutlingen | S 8 U 1247/20 | 25.11.2020 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 1 U 4115/20 | 12.04.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 9. September 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Ulm | S 2 SB 3570/19 | 10.03.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 8 SB 1041/21 | 17.09.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 9. September 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Ulm | S 15 SB 869/18 | 04.01.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 6 SB 147/21 | 22.07.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 9. September 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Reutlingen | S 3 R 2446/16 | 10.05.2019 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 9 BA 1700/19 | 23.02.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 9. September 2022 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 195 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 195 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 195 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 4850, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 131338 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-09-15 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-09-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 3 SF 492/22 AB [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-3-sf-492-22-ab [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 00:56:30 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 23:56:30 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-3-sf-492-22-ab/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128254 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-09-15 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-09-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 29 AS 520/22 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-29-as-520-22-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:37:58 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:37:58 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-29-as-520-22-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128251 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-09-15 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-09-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 27 AS 608/22 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-27-as-608-22-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:37:57 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:37:57 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-27-as-608-22-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128249 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-09-15 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-09-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 13 SB 129/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-13-sb-129-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:37:55 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:37:55 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-13-sb-129-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128246 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-09-15 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-09-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 27 AS 1588/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-27-as-1588-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:37:54 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:37:54 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-27-as-1588-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128242 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-09-15 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-09-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 13 VS 2/15 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-13-vs-2-15 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:37:51 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:37:51 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-13-vs-2-15/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128239 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-09-15 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-09-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 13 VJ 19/11 ZVW [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-13-vj-19-11-zvw [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:37:50 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:37:50 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-13-vj-19-11-zvw/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128237 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-09-15 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-09-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 30 P 69/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-30-p-69-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:37:48 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:37:48 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-30-p-69-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128231 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-09-15 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-09-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 20 AS 451/22 B PKH [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-20-as-451-22-b-pkh [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:37:45 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:37:45 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-20-as-451-22-b-pkh/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 133687 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-09-14 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-09-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 16 AL 135/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-16-al-135-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:15:59 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:15:59 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-16-al-135-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 133152 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-09-14 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-09-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 16 R 1479/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-16-r-1479-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:11:48 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:11:48 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-16-r-1479-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128228 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-09-14 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-09-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 KA 27/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-ka-27-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:37:43 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:37:43 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-ka-27-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128226 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-09-14 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-09-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 KA 12/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-ka-12-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:37:42 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:37:42 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-ka-12-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128223 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-09-14 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-09-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 KR 392/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-kr-392-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:37:40 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:37:40 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-kr-392-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128220 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-09-14 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-09-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 KR 226/20 WA [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-kr-226-20-wa [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:37:39 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:37:39 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-kr-226-20-wa/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128217 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-09-14 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-09-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 KA 43/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-ka-43-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:37:37 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:37:37 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-ka-43-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130716 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-09-13 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-09-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 P 78/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-p-78-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:08:35 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:08:35 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-p-78-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149722 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-09-12 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-09-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 12 KA 422/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-12-ka-422-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:43:52 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:43:52 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-12-ka-422-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140087 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-09-12 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-09-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 10 SO 2576/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-10-so-2576-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:14:47 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:14:47 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-10-so-2576-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 157812 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-09-09 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-09-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 12 U 4390/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-12-u-4390-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:49:55 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:49:55 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-12-u-4390-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 157808 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-09-09 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-09-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 SB 3190/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-sb-3190-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:49:51 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:49:51 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-sb-3190-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 157804 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-09-09 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-09-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 U 4115/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-u-4115-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:49:49 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:49:49 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-u-4115-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 157801 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-09-09 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-09-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 SB 1041/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-sb-1041-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:49:47 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:49:47 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-sb-1041-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 157797 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-09-09 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-09-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 SB 147/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-sb-147-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:49:45 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:49:45 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-sb-147-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 157793 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-09-09 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-09-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 BA 1700/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-ba-1700-19-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:49:42 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:49:42 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-ba-1700-19-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 131338 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-09-15 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-09-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 3 SF 492/22 AB [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-3-sf-492-22-ab [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 00:56:30 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 23:56:30 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-3-sf-492-22-ab/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => bb7076cc9eefdbbfdf6f971fcd345712 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:9a463a1de41ebccc2f84fe445e1407cc:0.55660800 1749048464 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.