| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Reutlingen | S 3 R 2446/16 | 10.05.2019 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 9 BA 1700/19 | 23.02.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 9. September 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 1 VJ 518/17 | 29.10.2019 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 6 VJ 4057/19 | 22.07.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 9. September 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Ulm | S 9 VG 1725/20 | 10.02.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 6 VG 928/21 | 22.07.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 9. September 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 1 U 1821/19 | 14.06.2019 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 9 U 2377/19 | 19.07.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 9. September 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Köln | S 40 AS 1395/22 ER | 15.06.2022 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 19 AS 905/22 B ER, L 19 AS 906/22 B | 05.08.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 9. September 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Köln | S 33 BA 33/21 ER | 11.03.2021 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 8 BA 50/21 B ER | 28.06.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 9. September 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Detmold | S 19 AS 1430/16 | 11.11.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 6 AS 1867/20 | 03.02.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 7 AS 17/22 R | 27.09.2023 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 9. September 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 93 KR 7696/19 | 17.09.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 16 KR 827/20 | 02.06.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 9. September 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Köln | S 5 SB 1660/20 | 18.08.2021 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 13 SB 234/21 | 10.12.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | B 9 SB 77/21 B | 13.06.2022 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 9. September 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Braunschweig | S 59 KR 504/19 | 20.05.2021 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 16 KR 251/21 | 16.06.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 9. September 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Bremen | S 21 AS 481/15 | 11.04.2019 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 15 AS 109/19 | 07.10.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 9. September 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Gießen | S 14 AL 32/22 | 15.08.2022 | - | - | Sozialgericht Gießen | 9. September 2022 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Hannover | S 19 KR 969/18 | 23.02.2022 | - | - | Sozialgericht Hannover | 9. September 2022 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Hannover | S 81 SO 440/21 | 07.06.2022 | - | - | Sozialgericht Hannover | 9. September 2022 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Braunschweig | S 54 KR 514/21 | 14.02.2022 | - | - | Sozialgericht Braunschweig | 9. September 2022 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Braunschweig | S 54 KR 682/20 | 07.05.2021 | - | - | Sozialgericht Braunschweig | 9. September 2022 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Braunschweig | S 54 KR 681/20 | 07.05.2021 | - | - | Sozialgericht Braunschweig | 9. September 2022 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Aurich | S 4 SB 154/21 | 02.06.2022 | - | - | Sozialgericht Aurich | 9. September 2022 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Darmstadt | S 26 VE 9/13 | 13.09.2019 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 1 VE 32/19 | 27.01.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 9 V 3/22 B | 11.07.2022 | Sozialgericht Darmstadt | 8. September 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Darmstadt | S 26 VE 9/13 | 13.09.2019 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 1 VE 32/19 | 27.01.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 9 V 3/22 B | 11.07.2022 | Sozialgericht Darmstadt | 8. September 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 5 KA 5488/16 | 28.11.2017 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 5 KA 184/18 | 28.04.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | B 6 KA 7/21 R | 06.04.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | 8. September 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 28 BA 20/21 | 31.08.2022 | - | - | Sozialgericht Berlin | 7. September 2022 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Marburg | S 18 KA 137/20 | 06.09.2022 | - | - | Sozialgericht Marburg | 7. September 2022 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 44 BA 18/20 ER | 03.09.2021 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 8 BA 142/21 B ER | 13.06.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 7. September 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Münster | S 24 BA 70/19 ER | 18.11.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 8 BA 195/20 B ER | 19.01.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 7. September 2022 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 196 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 196 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 196 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 4875, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 157792 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-09-09 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-09-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 BA 1700/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-ba-1700-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:49:42 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:49:42 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-ba-1700-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 157789 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-09-09 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-09-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 VJ 4057/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-vj-4057-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:49:39 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:49:39 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-vj-4057-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 157785 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-09-09 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-09-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 VG 928/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-vg-928-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:49:37 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:49:37 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-vg-928-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 157781 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-09-09 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-09-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 U 2377/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-u-2377-19-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:49:34 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:49:34 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-u-2377-19-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 147742 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-09-09 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-09-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 19 AS 905/22 B ER, L 19 AS 906/22 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-19-as-905-22-b-er-l-19-as-906-22-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:25:57 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:25:57 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-19-as-905-22-b-er-l-19-as-906-22-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 147737 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-09-09 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-09-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 BA 50/21 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-ba-50-21-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:25:54 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:25:54 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-ba-50-21-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 147732 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-09-09 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-09-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 AS 1867/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-as-1867-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:25:52 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:25:52 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-as-1867-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 147727 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-09-09 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-09-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 16 KR 827/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-16-kr-827-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:25:49 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:25:49 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-16-kr-827-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 147722 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-09-09 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-09-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 13 SB 234/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-13-sb-234-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:25:47 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:25:47 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-13-sb-234-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 138298 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-09-09 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-09-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 16 KR 251/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-16-kr-251-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:01:54 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:01:54 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-16-kr-251-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 138292 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-09-09 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-09-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 15 AS 109/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-15-as-109-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:01:51 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:01:51 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-15-as-109-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134941 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-09-09 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-09-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 14 AL 32/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-14-al-32-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:27:06 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:27:06 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-14-al-32-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130926 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-09-09 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-09-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 19 KR 969/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-19-kr-969-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 00:50:20 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 23:50:20 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-19-kr-969-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130925 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-09-09 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-09-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 81 SO 440/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-81-so-440-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 00:50:17 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 23:50:17 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-81-so-440-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 71281 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-09-09 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-09-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 54 KR 514/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-54-kr-514-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 15:40:09 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 14:40:09 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-54-kr-514-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 71280 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-09-09 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-09-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 54 KR 682/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-54-kr-682-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 15:40:07 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 14:40:07 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-54-kr-682-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 71279 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-09-09 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-09-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 54 KR 681/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-54-kr-681-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 15:40:05 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 14:40:05 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-54-kr-681-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 71267 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-09-09 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-09-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 4 SB 154/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-4-sb-154-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 15:35:58 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 14:35:58 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-4-sb-154-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 136750 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-09-08 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-09-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 26 VE 9/13 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-26-ve-9-13 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:40:48 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:40:48 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-26-ve-9-13/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 136743 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-09-08 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-09-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 VE 32/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-ve-32-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:40:46 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:40:46 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-ve-32-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87826 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-09-08 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-09-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 6 KA 7/21 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-6-ka-7-21-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:11:54 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:11:54 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-6-ka-7-21-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150211 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-09-07 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-09-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 28 BA 20/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-28-ba-20-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:48:23 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:48:23 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-28-ba-20-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149717 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-09-07 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-09-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 18 KA 137/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-18-ka-137-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:43:49 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:43:49 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-18-ka-137-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 147716 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-09-07 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-09-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 BA 142/21 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-ba-142-21-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:25:43 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:25:43 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-ba-142-21-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 147711 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-09-07 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-09-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 BA 195/20 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-ba-195-20-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:25:41 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:25:41 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-ba-195-20-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 157792 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-09-09 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-09-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 BA 1700/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-ba-1700-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:49:42 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:49:42 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-ba-1700-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 4d296262dbf16f27d35c64e15613ec3b [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:6ea413c96eb4a7da103b33d9312e64e5:0.78473500 1749198639 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.