| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 3 U 1033/13 | 27.01.2016 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 3 U 1862/16 | 20.03.2019 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 5. September 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Mannheim | S 9 U 74/17 | 09.10.2017 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 3 U 4278/17 | 20.03.2019 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 5. September 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 20 SB 5030/16 | 21.02.2018 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 3 SB 902/18 | 15.05.2019 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 5. September 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Heilbronn | S 3 R 1037/17 | 09.04.2019 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 8 BA 1940/19 | 24.09.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 5. September 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Heilbronn | S 10 SB 2259/21 | 12.01.2022 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 3 SB 417/22 | 10.08.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 5. September 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Reutlingen | S 2 R 3110/17 | 28.07.2020 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 9 R 2663/20 | 19.07.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 5. September 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Heilbronn | S 6 R 1805/17 | 26.10.2018 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 9 BA 4231/18 | 19.07.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 5. September 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Heilbronn | S 12 KR 3237/21 | 25.04.2022 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 11 KR 1419/22 | 02.08.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 5. September 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Reutlingen | S 9 KR 3268/18 | 25.06.2020 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 11 KR 2496/20 | 02.08.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 5. September 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Ulm | S 9 SB 2727/14 | 21.11.2017 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 3 SB 4739/17 | 15.05.2019 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 5. September 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Mannheim | S 21 R 4553/19 | 18.11.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 9 R 3849/21 | 25.08.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 5. September 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 8 R 275/20 | 05.02.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 9 R 666/22 | 25.08.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 5. September 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 8 R 3622/20 | 05.02.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 9 R 667/22 | 25.08.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 5. September 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 6 R 700/20 | 01.04.2022 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 9 R 1151/22 | 25.08.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 5. September 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Heilbronn | S 3 SB 4273/15 | 21.06.2018 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 3 SB 2257/18 | 15.05.2019 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 5. September 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Marburg | S 11 KA 465/20 | 28.01.2022 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 KA 16/22 | 27.07.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 6 KA 7/22 R | 25.10.2023 | Sozialgericht Marburg | 2. September 2022 |
| Sozialgericht München | S 51 SO 495/16 | 11.07.2019 | - | - | Sozialgericht München | 2. September 2022 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Augsburg | S 10 P 119/21 | 02.06.2022 | - | - | Sozialgericht Augsburg | 2. September 2022 | ||||
| - | - | - | Sozialgericht Detmold | 2. September 2022 | ||||||
| - | - | - | Sozialgericht Detmold | 2. September 2022 | ||||||
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 77 VJ 69/18 | 09.05.2022 | - | - | Sozialgericht Dortmund | 2. September 2022 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 31 AS 51/22 | 12.08.2022 | - | - | Sozialgericht Dortmund | 2. September 2022 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 175 AS 3864/16 | 07.12.2017 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 1 AS 101/18 | 20.06.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 2. September 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 89 KR 1809/17 | 06.11.2020 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 1 BA 77/20 | 20.06.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 2. September 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Neuruppin | S 26 AS 1131/18 | 04.05.2021 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 1 AS 701/21 | 20.05.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 2. September 2022 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 198 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 198 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 198 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 4925, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 157718 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-09-05 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-09-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 U 1862/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-u-1862-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:48:53 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:48:53 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-u-1862-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 157714 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-09-05 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-09-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 U 4278/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-u-4278-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:48:50 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:48:50 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-u-4278-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 157710 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-09-05 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-09-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 SB 902/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-sb-902-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:48:48 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:48:48 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-sb-902-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 157706 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-09-05 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-09-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 BA 1940/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-ba-1940-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:48:45 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:48:45 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-ba-1940-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 157702 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-09-05 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-09-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 SB 417/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-sb-417-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:48:43 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:48:43 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-sb-417-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 157698 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-09-05 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-09-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 R 2663/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-r-2663-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:48:40 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:48:40 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-r-2663-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 157694 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-09-05 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-09-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 BA 4231/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-ba-4231-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:48:38 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:48:38 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-ba-4231-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 157690 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-09-05 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-09-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 KR 1419/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-kr-1419-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:48:35 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:48:35 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-kr-1419-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 157686 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-09-05 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-09-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 KR 2496/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-kr-2496-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:48:32 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:48:32 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-kr-2496-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 157682 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-09-05 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-09-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 SB 4739/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-sb-4739-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:48:30 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:48:30 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-sb-4739-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 157679 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-09-05 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-09-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 R 3849/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-r-3849-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:48:28 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:48:28 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-r-3849-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 157675 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-09-05 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-09-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 R 666/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-r-666-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:48:25 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:48:25 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-r-666-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 157672 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-09-05 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-09-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 R 667/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-r-667-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:48:23 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:48:23 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-r-667-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 157668 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-09-05 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-09-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 R 1151/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-r-1151-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:48:21 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:48:21 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-r-1151-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 157664 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-09-05 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-09-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 SB 2257/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-sb-2257-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:48:18 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:48:18 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-sb-2257-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149711 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-09-02 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-09-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 KA 16/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-ka-16-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:43:46 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:43:46 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-ka-16-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143510 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-09-02 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-09-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 51 SO 495/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-51-so-495-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:40:06 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:40:06 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-51-so-495-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140313 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-09-02 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-09-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 10 P 119/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-10-p-119-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:17:51 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:17:51 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-10-p-119-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140284 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-09-02 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-09-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 31 KR 137/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-31-kr-137-20-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:17:23 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:17:23 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-31-kr-137-20-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140283 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-09-02 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-09-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 31 KR 137/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-31-kr-137-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:17:23 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:17:23 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-31-kr-137-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137561 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-09-02 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-09-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 77 VJ 69/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-77-vj-69-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:46:29 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:46:29 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-77-vj-69-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137559 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-09-02 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-09-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 31 AS 51/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-31-as-51-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:46:27 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:46:27 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-31-as-51-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128214 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-09-02 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-09-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 AS 101/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-as-101-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:37:35 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:37:35 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-as-101-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128211 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-09-02 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-09-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 BA 77/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-ba-77-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:37:34 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:37:34 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-ba-77-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128209 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-09-02 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-09-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 AS 701/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-as-701-21-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:37:32 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:37:32 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-as-701-21-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 157718 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-09-05 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-09-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 U 1862/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-u-1862-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:48:53 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:48:53 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-u-1862-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 5902ad114be45f54d5c0bbdc4d73cef7 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:1feff243c652fa9fad00d4538bac5fd9:0.57668300 1749249327 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.