| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Neuruppin | S 26 AS 1131/18 | 04.05.2021 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 1 AS 701/21 | 20.05.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 2. September 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Cottbus | S 42 KR 66/22 ER | 13.04.2022 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 1 KR 155/22 B ER | 14.07.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 2. September 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 91 KR 262/17 | 02.09.2019 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 1 BA 86/19 | 20.06.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 BA 6/22 R | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 2. September 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt (Oder) | S 27 KR 327/16 | 06.05.2020 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 9 BA 44/20 | 15.06.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 2. September 2022 | ||
| - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 7 KA 8/22 ER | 30.06.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 2. September 2022 | ||||
| - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 7 KA 8/22 ER | 30.06.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 2. September 2022 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Mannheim | S 9 U 77/20 | 14.01.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 9 U 345/21 | 20.04.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 1. September 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Mannheim | S 10 AS 2411/17 | 20.06.2018 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 12 AS 412/21 | 13.05.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 1. September 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Konstanz | S 6 AS 2322/19 | 19.10.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 3 AS 3749/21 | 23.03.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 1. September 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 14 R 385/20 | 23.06.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 11 R 2419/21 | 25.01.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 1. September 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 14 R 2177/20 | 29.06.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 11 R 2464/21 | 25.01.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 1. September 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 14 R 4147/20 | 11.08.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 11 R 3016/21 | 25.01.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 1. September 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Reutlingen | S 9 R 190/20 | 20.05.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 11 R 2040/21 | 25.01.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 1. September 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 89 BA 2/21 ER | 22.11.2021 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 8 BA 2/22 B ER | 16.03.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 1. September 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 34 BA 103/18 | 20.08.2019 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 8 BA 213/19 NZB | 21.03.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 1. September 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 89 BA 57/21 ER | 15.02.2022 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 8 BA 34/22 B ER | 27.05.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 1. September 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 71 BA 88/21 ER | 17.02.2022 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 8 BA 38/22 B ER | 02.05.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 1. September 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Kassel | S 4 AS 347/17 | 31.08.2018 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 6 AS 97/20 | 24.08.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 4 AS 22/22 R | - | Sozialgericht Kassel | 1. September 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Würzburg | S 13 SF 106/21 E | 12.01.2022 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 12 SF 39/22 | 22.07.2022 | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 1. September 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Regensburg | S 15 RF 13/18 | 30.04.2020 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 12 SF 209/20 | 23.08.2022 | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 1. September 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Oldenburg | S 37 AS 1123/18 | 27.08.2019 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 13 AS 173/19 | 27.01.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | B 7/14 AS 9/21 R | 18.05.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | 1. September 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 35 AS 4322/16 | 29.10.2018 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 12 AS 2055/18 | 28.10.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 7/14 AS 1/21 R | 18.05.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | 1. September 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 30 R 3366/18 | 28.08.2019 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 16 R 670/19 | 26.02.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 5 R 35/21 R | 07.04.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | 1. September 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Lübeck | S 40 AS 658/16 | 06.11.2018 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 AS 133/18 | 23.10.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 4 AS 24/21 R | 29.03.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | 1. September 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Augsburg | S 18 U 169/17 | 15.02.2018 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 U 117/18 | 28.07.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 13/20 R | 31.03.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | 1. September 2022 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 199 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 199 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 199 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 4950, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128208 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-09-02 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-09-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 AS 701/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-as-701-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:37:32 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:37:32 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-as-701-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128206 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-09-02 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-09-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 155/22 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-155-22-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:37:30 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:37:30 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-155-22-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128203 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-09-02 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-09-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 BA 86/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-ba-86-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:37:29 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:37:29 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-ba-86-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128200 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-09-02 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-09-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 BA 44/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-ba-44-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:37:27 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:37:27 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-ba-44-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128197 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-09-02 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-09-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 KA 8/22 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-ka-8-22-er-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:37:26 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:37:26 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-ka-8-22-er-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128196 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-09-02 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-09-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 KA 8/22 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-ka-8-22-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:37:26 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:37:26 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-ka-8-22-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 157660 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-09-01 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-09-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 U 345/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-u-345-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:48:15 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:48:15 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-u-345-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 157656 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-09-01 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-09-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 12 AS 412/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-12-as-412-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:48:12 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:48:12 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-12-as-412-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 157652 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-09-01 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-09-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 AS 3749/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-as-3749-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:48:09 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:48:09 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-as-3749-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 157645 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-09-01 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-09-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 R 2419/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-r-2419-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:48:05 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:48:05 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-r-2419-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 157641 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-09-01 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-09-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 R 2464/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-r-2464-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:48:02 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:48:02 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-r-2464-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 157637 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-09-01 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-09-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 R 3016/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-r-3016-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:48:00 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:48:00 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-r-3016-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 157632 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-09-01 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-09-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 R 2040/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-r-2040-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:47:56 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:47:56 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-r-2040-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 147706 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-09-01 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-09-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 BA 2/22 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-ba-2-22-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:25:38 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:25:38 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-ba-2-22-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 147702 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-09-01 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-09-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 BA 213/19 NZB [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-ba-213-19-nzb [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:25:36 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:25:36 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-ba-213-19-nzb/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 147696 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-09-01 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-09-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 BA 34/22 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-ba-34-22-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:25:33 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:25:33 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-ba-34-22-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 147690 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-09-01 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-09-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 BA 38/22 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-ba-38-22-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:25:29 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:25:29 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-ba-38-22-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 139228 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-09-01 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-09-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 AS 97/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-as-97-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:07:41 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:07:41 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-as-97-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130714 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-09-01 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-09-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 12 SF 39/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-12-sf-39-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:08:32 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:08:32 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-12-sf-39-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130713 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-09-01 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-09-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 12 SF 209/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-12-sf-209-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:08:31 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:08:31 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-12-sf-209-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87824 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-09-01 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-09-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 7/14 AS 9/21 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-7-14-as-9-21-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:11:50 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:11:50 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-7-14-as-9-21-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87823 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-09-01 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-09-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 7/14 AS 1/21 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-7-14-as-1-21-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:11:48 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:11:48 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-7-14-as-1-21-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87822 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-09-01 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-09-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 5 R 35/21 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-5-r-35-21-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:11:47 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:11:47 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-5-r-35-21-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87821 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-09-01 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-09-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 4 AS 24/21 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-4-as-24-21-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:11:45 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:11:45 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-4-as-24-21-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87820 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-09-01 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-09-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 2 U 13/20 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-2-u-13-20-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:11:44 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:11:44 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-2-u-13-20-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128208 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-09-02 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-09-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 AS 701/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-as-701-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:37:32 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:37:32 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-as-701-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => d7a33fd2803d37f27098d955fbbbb1e9 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:94ba318fc12218763eb34ba2fdd1c8f9:0.14766200 1749249262 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.