| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 91 KR 1402/20 | 02.02.2021 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 1 KR 55/21 | 22.11.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 18. Dezember 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 166 KR 984/20 | 17.11.2020 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 1 KR 456/20 | 25.10.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 18. Dezember 2024 | ||
| Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 1 KR 178/17 KL | 13.09.2024 | - | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 18. Dezember 2024 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 166 KR 1035/22 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 1 SF 61/24 AB | 25.07.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 18. Dezember 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 122 KR 673/24 ER | 27.06.2024 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 1 KR 231/24 B ER | 15.11.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 18. Dezember 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 47 KR 838/13 | 22.12.2017 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 9 BA 7/18 | 29.01.2024 | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 17. Dezember 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Köln | S 34 R 555/24 | 12.07.2024 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 8 R 605/24 B ER | 09.12.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 17. Dezember 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Nürnberg | S 17 AL 201/24 | 13.09.2024 | Bundessozialgericht | B 4 SF 6/24 S | - | - | Sozialgericht Nürnberg | 17. Dezember 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Chemnitz | S 38 KR 543/18 | 12.08.2019 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 1 KR 280/19 | 18.10.2023 | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 16. Dezember 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 6 AS 8518/13 | 25.08.2017 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 AS 150/20 | 09.12.2024 | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 16. Dezember 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 6 AS 1644/15 | 25.08.2017 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 AS 358/24 | 09.12.2024 | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 16. Dezember 2024 | ||
| - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 10 KO 1755/23 | 04.10.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 16. Dezember 2024 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Hannover | S 50 KR 1162/17 | 17.11.2021 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 16 KR 562/21 | 12.11.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 16. Dezember 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Hannover | S 78 KA 311/13 | 16.12.2015 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 3 KA 14/20 | 26.04.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 16. Dezember 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Bremen | S 31 BA 18/20 | 31.05.2023 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 12 BA 9/23 | 24.10.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 16. Dezember 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 36 KR 3667/17 | 12.11.2021 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 28 KR 452/21 | 20.06.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 16. Dezember 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Potsdam | S 32 KR 348/20 | 08.09.2022 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 14 KR 369/22 | 09.10.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 16. Dezember 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Reutlingen | S 12 R 1116/20 | 04.10.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 7 R 3381/21 | 16.11.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 13. Dezember 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Ulm | S 6 SO 1750/21 | 16.02.2023 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 7 SO 953/23 | 20.07.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 13. Dezember 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 4 SO 1355/23 ER | 21.06.2023 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 7 SO 1892/23 ER-B | 18.07.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 13. Dezember 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 5 R 1018/19 | 02.02.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 7 R 970/21 | 25.05.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 13. Dezember 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Reutlingen | S 3 R 580/18 | 04.12.2020 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 11 R 174/21 | 23.05.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 13. Dezember 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 4 R 1293/22 | 28.09.2023 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 13 R 3109/23 | 14.05.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 13. Dezember 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Ulm | S 9 AS 1386/21 | 19.07.2023 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 3 AS 2341/23 | 27.11.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 13. Dezember 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 21 AL 2685/23 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 3 AL 3206/24 B | 14.11.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 13. Dezember 2024 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 2 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 2 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 2 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 25, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129866 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-12-18 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-12-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 55/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-55-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:54:36 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:54:36 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-55-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129863 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-12-18 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-12-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 456/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-456-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:54:34 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:54:34 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-456-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129860 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-12-18 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-12-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 178/17 KL [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-178-17-kl-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:54:33 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:54:33 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-178-17-kl-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129857 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-12-18 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-12-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 SF 61/24 AB [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-sf-61-24-ab [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:54:31 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:54:31 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-sf-61-24-ab/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129854 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-12-18 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-12-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 231/24 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-231-24-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:54:30 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:54:30 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-231-24-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161531 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-12-17 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-12-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 BA 7/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-ba-7-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:42:42 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:42:42 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-ba-7-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 151045 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-12-17 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-12-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 R 605/24 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-r-605-24-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 13:02:37 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 12:02:37 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-r-605-24-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134922 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-12-17 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-12-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 17 AL 201/24 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-17-al-201-24 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:26:33 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:26:33 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-17-al-201-24/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161529 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-12-16 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-12-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 280/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-280-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:42:39 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:42:39 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-280-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161527 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-12-16 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-12-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 AS 150/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-as-150-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:42:37 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:42:37 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-as-150-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161524 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-12-16 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-12-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 AS 358/24 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-as-358-24 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:42:32 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:42:32 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-as-358-24/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161227 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-12-16 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-12-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 KO 1755/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-ko-1755-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:35:31 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:35:31 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-ko-1755-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 139695 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-12-16 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-12-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 16 KR 562/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-16-kr-562-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:10:50 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:10:50 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-16-kr-562-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 139691 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-12-16 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-12-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 KA 14/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-ka-14-20-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:10:48 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:10:48 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-ka-14-20-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 139687 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-12-16 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-12-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 12 BA 9/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-12-ba-9-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:10:46 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:10:46 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-12-ba-9-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129851 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-12-16 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-12-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 28 KR 452/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-28-kr-452-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:54:28 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:54:28 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-28-kr-452-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129849 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-12-16 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-12-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 14 KR 369/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-14-kr-369-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:54:27 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:54:27 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-14-kr-369-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161225 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-12-13 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-12-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 R 3381/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-r-3381-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:35:29 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:35:29 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-r-3381-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161223 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-12-13 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-12-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 SO 953/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-so-953-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:35:26 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:35:26 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-so-953-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161221 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-12-13 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-12-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 SO 1892/23 ER-B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-so-1892-23-er-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:35:24 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:35:24 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-so-1892-23-er-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161219 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-12-13 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-12-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 R 970/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-r-970-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:35:22 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:35:22 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-r-970-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161217 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-12-13 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-12-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 R 174/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-r-174-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:35:19 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:35:19 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-r-174-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161215 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-12-13 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-12-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 13 R 3109/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-13-r-3109-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:35:17 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:35:17 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-13-r-3109-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161213 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-12-13 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-12-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 AS 2341/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-as-2341-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:35:15 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:35:15 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-as-2341-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 161211 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-12-13 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-12-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 AL 3206/24 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-al-3206-24-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:35:12 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:35:12 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-al-3206-24-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129866 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-12-18 01:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-12-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 55/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-55-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:54:36 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:54:36 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-55-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 52f2b33243dd2224971222d2ae3daa05 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.