| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Braunschweig | S 41 AS 1355/19 | 14.06.2022 | - | - | Sozialgericht Braunschweig | 26. August 2022 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Braunschweig | S 54 KR 103/21 | 16.02.2022 | - | - | Sozialgericht Braunschweig | 26. August 2022 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Hildesheim | S 26 AS 473/18 | 13.05.2022 | - | - | Sozialgericht Hildesheim | 26. August 2022 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 6 KR 2309/17 | 28.05.2018 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 4 KR 2410/18 | 15.10.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 25. August 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 11 SB 2695/19 | 04.09.2020 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 6 SB 3179/20 | 22.07.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 25. August 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 11 R 4676/19 | 03.11.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 11 R 3685/21 | 02.08.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 25. August 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 1 U 1821/19 | 14.06.2019 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 9 U 2377/19 | 19.07.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 25. August 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 22 AS 191/22 | 18.03.2022 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 3 AS 1169/22 | 20.07.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 25. August 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Heilbronn | S 16 AS 3357/18 | 14.04.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 3 AS 1765/21 NZB | 28.03.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 25. August 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Heilbronn | S 4 SB 2336/17 | 27.11.2020 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 3 SB 2/21 | 10.08.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 25. August 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Reutlingen | S 2 SB 2630/19 | 17.03.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 12 SB 1425/21 | 17.12.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 25. August 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 17 AS 695/22 ER | 01.04.2022 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 3 AS 1171/22 B | 10.08.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 25. August 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Detmold | S 20 AS 950/16 | 07.10.2021 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 7 AS 1681/21 | 30.06.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 25. August 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Köln | S 44 AS 696/22 ER | 04.04.2022 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 7 AS 585/22 B ER | 13.07.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 25. August 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 83 KR 6783/19 | 27.06.2022 | - | - | Sozialgericht Dortmund | 24. August 2022 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 9 KG 3744/20 | 24.05.2022 | - | - | Sozialgericht Freiburg | 24. August 2022 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 9 SO 2322/21 | 22.03.2022 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 2 SO 1183/22 | - | - | Sozialgericht Freiburg | 24. August 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Gotha | S 9 AL 1346/15 | 18.04.2017 | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | L 10 AL 648/17 | 30.09.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 11 AL 30/21 R | 29.03.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | 24. August 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Bayreuth | S 16 R 279/17 | 05.07.2018 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 19 R 585/18 | 03.03.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | B 5 R 17/21 R | 07.04.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | 24. August 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Aachen | S 13 KR 114/17 | 06.02.2018 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 16 KR 128/18 | 17.12.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 26/21 R | 26.04.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | 24. August 2022 |
| Sozialgericht München | S 47 R 485/21 | 13.09.2021 | - | - | Sozialgericht München | 23. August 2022 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 10 U 383/19 | 17.01.2020 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 10 U 1400/20 | 23.06.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 22. August 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Reutlingen | S 4 SO 128/21 | 18.05.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 2 SO 1926/21 | 08.12.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 22. August 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 3 AS 2057/21 | 22.02.2022 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 2 AS 993/22 | 27.06.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 22. August 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Heilbronn | S 7 U 3198/19 | 10.11.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 1 U 3883/21 | 16.08.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 22. August 2022 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 202 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 202 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 202 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 5025, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 71278 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-08-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-08-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 41 AS 1355/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-41-as-1355-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 15:40:03 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 14:40:03 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-41-as-1355-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 71277 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-08-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-08-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 54 KR 103/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-54-kr-103-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 15:40:01 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 14:40:01 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-54-kr-103-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 71258 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-08-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-08-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 26 AS 473/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-26-as-473-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 15:35:22 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 14:35:22 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-26-as-473-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 157554 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-08-25 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-08-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 KR 2410/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-kr-2410-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:47:06 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:47:06 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-kr-2410-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 157549 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-08-25 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-08-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 SB 3179/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-sb-3179-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:47:02 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:47:02 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-sb-3179-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 157544 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-08-25 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-08-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 R 3685/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-r-3685-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:46:59 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:46:59 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-r-3685-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 157540 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-08-25 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-08-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 U 2377/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-u-2377-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:46:56 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:46:56 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-u-2377-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 157536 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-08-25 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-08-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 AS 1169/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-as-1169-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:46:54 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:46:54 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-as-1169-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 157532 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-08-25 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-08-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 AS 1765/21 NZB [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-as-1765-21-nzb [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:46:51 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:46:51 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-as-1765-21-nzb/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 157527 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-08-25 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-08-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 SB 2/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-sb-2-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:46:48 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:46:48 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-sb-2-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 157524 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-08-25 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-08-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 12 SB 1425/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-12-sb-1425-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:46:46 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:46:46 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-12-sb-1425-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 157520 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-08-25 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-08-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 AS 1171/22 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-as-1171-22-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:46:43 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:46:43 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-as-1171-22-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 147580 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-08-25 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-08-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 AS 1681/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-as-1681-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:24:30 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:24:30 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-as-1681-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 147575 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-08-25 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-08-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 AS 585/22 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-as-585-22-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:24:28 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:24:28 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-as-585-22-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 137557 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-08-24 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-08-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 83 KR 6783/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-83-kr-6783-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:46:26 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:46:26 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-83-kr-6783-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 133145 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-08-24 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-08-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 9 KG 3744/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-9-kg-3744-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:11:46 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:11:46 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-9-kg-3744-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 133140 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-08-24 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-08-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 9 SO 2322/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-9-so-2322-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:11:44 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:11:44 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-9-so-2322-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87818 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-08-24 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-08-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 11 AL 30/21 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-11-al-30-21-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:11:40 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:11:40 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-11-al-30-21-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87817 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-08-24 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-08-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 5 R 17/21 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-5-r-17-21-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:11:38 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:11:38 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-5-r-17-21-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87816 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-08-24 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-08-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 1 KR 26/21 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-1-kr-26-21-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:11:37 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:11:37 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-1-kr-26-21-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143506 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-08-23 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-08-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 47 R 485/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-47-r-485-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:40:04 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:40:04 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-47-r-485-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 157515 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-08-22 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-08-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 U 1400/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-u-1400-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:46:40 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:46:40 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-u-1400-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 157511 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-08-22 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-08-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 SO 1926/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-so-1926-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:46:37 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:46:37 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-so-1926-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 157506 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-08-22 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-08-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 AS 993/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-as-993-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:46:34 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:46:34 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-as-993-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 157502 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-08-22 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-08-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 U 3883/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-u-3883-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:46:32 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:46:32 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-u-3883-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 71278 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-08-26 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-08-26 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 41 AS 1355/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-41-as-1355-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-20 15:40:03 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-20 14:40:03 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-41-as-1355-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => b6043895a4558a8df85f81086ae31a94 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:7b513421b332485d4fa8b949143d7ae0:0.39345900 1749329109 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.