| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Augsburg | S 16 AS 1375/18 | 04.04.2019 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 AS 499/19 NZB | 01.10.2019 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 AS 664/19 | 07.04.2022 | Sozialgericht Augsburg | 22. August 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 9 R 2835/20 | 12.08.2022 | - | - | Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | 22. August 2022 | ||||
| Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 10 KR 128/17 | 25.01.2022 | Sozialgericht Kiel | S 19 KR 343/13 | 08.05.2017 | - | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | 19. August 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht München | S 38 KA 125/19 | 02.06.2022 | - | - | Sozialgericht München | 19. August 2022 | ||||
| Sozialgericht München | S 7 KR 2383/21 | 10.08.2022 | - | - | Sozialgericht München | 19. August 2022 | ||||
| Sozialgericht München | S 28 KA 243/20 | 09.05.2022 | - | - | Sozialgericht München | 19. August 2022 | ||||
| Sozialgericht München | S 28 KA 240/20 | 09.05.2022 | - | - | Sozialgericht München | 19. August 2022 | ||||
| Sozialgericht München | S 13 KG 13/20 | 07.03.2022 | - | - | Sozialgericht München | 19. August 2022 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Heilbronn | S 3 R 2663/17 | 25.09.2019 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 9 R 3659/19 | 18.01.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 18. August 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Ulm | S 4 R 2550/16 | 23.05.2019 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 9 R 3194/19 | 18.01.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 18. August 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 14 AS 3622/17 | 21.03.2019 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 3 AS 1753/19 | 13.12.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 18. August 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Heilbronn | S 8 R 2574/18 | 12.12.2019 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 10 R 100/20 | 20.01.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 18. August 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Heilbronn | S 3 U 1696/19 | 17.12.2020 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 1 U 248/21 | 06.12.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 18. August 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Ulm | S 9 U 2240/18 | 10.12.2022 | L 1 U 69/21 | - | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 18. August 2022 | |||
| Sozialgericht Mannheim | S 10 R 2576/21 ER | 24.11.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 10 R 3981/21 ER-B | 19.01.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 18. August 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Regensburg | S 15 R 120/17 | 10.05.2018 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 14 R 348/18 | 13.01.2022 | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 18. August 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Augsburg | S 16 AS 1375/18 | 04.04.2019 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 AS 664/19 | 07.04.2022 | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 18. August 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht München | S 47 R 485/21 | 13.09.2021 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 14 R 495/21 | 27.01.2022 | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 18. August 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 210 KR 1953/12 | 27.05.2016 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 4 KR 394/16 | 24.05.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 KR 32/22 B | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 18. August 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Potsdam | S 2 U 138/16 | 19.09.2018 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 3 U 208/18 | 10.02.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 18. August 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 174 AS 15822/15 | 05.01.2022 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 3 AS 83/22 NZB | 06.07.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 18. August 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 174 AS 15822/15 | 05.01.2022 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 3 AS 50/22 | 06.07.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 18. August 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 107 AS 6489/13 | 27.10.2016 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 32 AS 2845/16 | 31.05.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 18. August 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 107 AS 23489/13 | 27.10.2016 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 32 AS 2866/16 | 31.05.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 18. August 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 167 AS 5275/19 | 28.08.2020 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 4 AS 1340/20 B PKH | 25.07.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 18. August 2022 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 203 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 203 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 203 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 5050, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140311 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-08-22 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-08-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 16 AS 1375/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-16-as-1375-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:17:49 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:17:49 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-16-as-1375-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140082 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-08-22 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-08-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 9 R 2835/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-9-r-2835-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:14:45 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:14:45 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-9-r-2835-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150376 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-08-19 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-08-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 KR 128/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-kr-128-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:50:11 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:50:11 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-kr-128-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143502 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-08-19 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-08-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 38 KA 125/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-38-ka-125-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:40:02 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:40:02 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-38-ka-125-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143498 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-08-19 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-08-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 7 KR 2383/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-7-kr-2383-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:40:00 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:40:00 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-7-kr-2383-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143494 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-08-19 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-08-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 28 KA 243/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-28-ka-243-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:39:58 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:39:58 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-28-ka-243-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143490 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-08-19 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-08-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 28 KA 240/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-28-ka-240-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:39:57 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:39:57 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-28-ka-240-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143486 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-08-19 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-08-19 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 13 KG 13/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-13-kg-13-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:39:55 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:39:55 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-13-kg-13-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 157498 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-08-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-08-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 R 3659/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-r-3659-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:46:28 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:46:28 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-r-3659-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 157494 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-08-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-08-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 R 3194/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-r-3194-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:46:26 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:46:26 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-r-3194-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 157490 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-08-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-08-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 AS 1753/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-as-1753-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:46:23 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:46:23 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-as-1753-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 157486 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-08-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-08-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 R 100/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-r-100-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:46:20 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:46:20 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-r-100-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 157482 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-08-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-08-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 U 248/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-u-248-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:46:18 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:46:18 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-u-248-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 157478 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-08-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-08-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 U 69/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-u-69-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:46:16 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:46:16 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-u-69-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 157475 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-08-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-08-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 R 3981/21 ER-B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-r-3981-21-er-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:46:13 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:46:13 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-r-3981-21-er-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130712 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-08-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-08-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 14 R 348/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-14-r-348-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:08:29 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:08:29 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-14-r-348-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130711 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-08-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-08-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 AS 664/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-as-664-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:08:27 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:08:27 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-as-664-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130710 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-08-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-08-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 14 R 495/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-14-r-495-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:08:25 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:08:25 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-14-r-495-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128195 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-08-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-08-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 KR 394/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-kr-394-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:37:24 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:37:24 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-kr-394-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128191 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-08-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-08-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 U 208/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-u-208-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:37:23 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:37:23 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-u-208-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128188 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-08-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-08-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 AS 83/22 NZB [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-as-83-22-nzb [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:37:21 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:37:21 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-as-83-22-nzb/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128185 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-08-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-08-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 AS 50/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-as-50-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:37:19 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:37:19 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-as-50-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128183 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-08-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-08-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 32 AS 2845/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-32-as-2845-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:37:18 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:37:18 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-32-as-2845-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128179 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-08-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-08-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 32 AS 2866/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-32-as-2866-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:37:16 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:37:16 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-32-as-2866-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128176 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-08-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-08-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 AS 1340/20 B PKH [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-as-1340-20-b-pkh [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:37:14 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:37:14 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-as-1340-20-b-pkh/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140311 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-08-22 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-08-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 16 AS 1375/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-16-as-1375-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:17:49 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:17:49 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-16-as-1375-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 71ba6f3a86fb54ef7c8367656d2f2ef2 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:112e9ab1209beb460b91d0961bc504bd:0.39893800 1749330247 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.