| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 10 SB 321/20 | 13.04.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 6 SB 1696/21 | 21.07.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 12. August 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Konstanz | S 4 VS 408/20 | 27.05.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 6 VS 2165/21 | 21.07.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 12. August 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 1 VS 1135/21 | 08.03.2022 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 6 VS 933/22 | 21.07.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 12. August 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 33 KR 1412/20 | 17.02.2022 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 5 KR 318/22 B | 13.06.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 12. August 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Aachen | S 2 BA 16/20 ER | 28.09.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 8 BA 166/20 B ER | 06.04.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 12. August 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Duisburg | S 27 KR 1076/19 | 07.02.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 16 KR 133/20 | 21.10.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 KR 4/22 BH | 28.07.2022 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 12. August 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 38 AS 1288/21 | 19.01.2022 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 2 AS 371/22 B | 21.06.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 11. August 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Köln | S 13 AS 747/22 ER | 19.05.2022 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 21 AS 738/22 B ER | 17.06.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 11. August 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | S 4 AS 2241/21 | 25.04.2022 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 7 AS 839/22 B | 13.07.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 11. August 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht München | S 47 R 1579/17 | 24.09.2018 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 6 BA 169/18 | 19.02.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 R 2/20 R | 29.03.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | 11. August 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 31 EG 11/17 | 21.06.2018 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 2 EG 3/18 | 27.03.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 10 EG 1/20 R | 24.03.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | 11. August 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Trier | S 6 AS 75/19 | 02.04.2020 | Landessozialgericht Rheinland-Pfalz | L 3 AS 108/20 | 22.09.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 7/14 AS 91/20 R | 09.03.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | 11. August 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 40 AS 1540/19 | 19.11.2019 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 19 AS 2043/19 | 11.03.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | B 7/14 AS 27/21 R | 18.05.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | 11. August 2022 |
| - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 1 KR 178/17 KL | 11.03.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 3 KR 4/20 R | 07.04.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | 11. August 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 40 AS 4027/18 | 24.05.2022 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 7 AS 858/22 B | 12.07.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 10. August 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Detmold | S 22 R 1065/14 | 21.07.2015 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 14 R 714/15 | 05.05.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 10. August 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht München | S 47 BA 76/22 ER | 12.05.2022 | - | - | Sozialgericht München | 10. August 2022 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Augsburg | S 10 KR 80/22 ER | 06.04.2022 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 KR 209/22 B ER | 05.07.2022 | - | Sozialgericht Augsburg | 10. August 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Augsburg | S 17 R 294/20 | 11.05.2021 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 13 R 326/21 | 24.11.2021 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | B 5 RS 1/22 B | 22.06.2022 | Sozialgericht Augsburg | 10. August 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Augsburg | S 3 KR 67/21 | 07.07.2022 | - | - | Sozialgericht Augsburg | 10. August 2022 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Kiel | S 22 SO 11/22 ER | 21.06.2022 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 9 SO 71/22 B ER | 02.08.2022 | - | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | 9. August 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Duisburg | S 17 KR 2268/18 | 18.07.2019 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 10 KR 700/19 | 18.08.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 78/21 B | 26.04.2022 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 9. August 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Duisburg | S 60 KR 2273/18 | 16.10.2019 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 10 KR 925/19 | 19.04.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 47/21 B | 26.04.2022 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 9. August 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Duisburg | S 44 KR 2257/18 | 25.09.2019 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 10 KR 851/19 | 19.04.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 48/21 B | 26.04.2022 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 9. August 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 12 AS 254/22 ER | 12.05.2022 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 7 AS 752/22 B ER | 08.07.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 9. August 2022 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 205 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 205 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 205 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 5100, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 157411 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-08-12 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-08-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 SB 1696/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-sb-1696-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:45:31 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:45:31 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-sb-1696-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 157407 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-08-12 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-08-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 VS 2165/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-vs-2165-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:45:28 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:45:28 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-vs-2165-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 157403 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-08-12 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-08-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 VS 933/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-vs-933-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:45:25 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:45:25 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-vs-933-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 147571 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-08-12 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-08-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KR 318/22 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-kr-318-22-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:24:26 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:24:26 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-kr-318-22-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 147566 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-08-12 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-08-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 BA 166/20 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-ba-166-20-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:24:23 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:24:23 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-ba-166-20-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 147562 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-08-12 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-08-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 16 KR 133/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-16-kr-133-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:24:21 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:24:21 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-16-kr-133-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 147557 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-08-11 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-08-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 AS 371/22 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-as-371-22-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:24:18 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:24:18 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-as-371-22-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 147552 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-08-11 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-08-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 21 AS 738/22 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-21-as-738-22-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:24:16 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:24:16 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-21-as-738-22-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 147547 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-08-11 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-08-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 AS 839/22 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-as-839-22-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:24:13 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:24:13 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-as-839-22-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87814 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-08-11 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-08-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 12 R 2/20 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-12-r-2-20-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:11:33 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:11:33 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-12-r-2-20-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87813 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-08-11 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-08-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 10 EG 1/20 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-10-eg-1-20-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:11:32 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:11:32 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-10-eg-1-20-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87812 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-08-11 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-08-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 7/14 AS 91/20 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-7-14-as-91-20-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:11:30 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:11:30 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-7-14-as-91-20-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87811 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-08-11 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-08-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 7/14 AS 27/21 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-7-14-as-27-21-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:11:29 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:11:29 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-7-14-as-27-21-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87810 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-08-11 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-08-11 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 3 KR 4/20 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-3-kr-4-20-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:11:27 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:11:27 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-3-kr-4-20-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 147542 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-08-10 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-08-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 AS 858/22 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-as-858-22-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:24:10 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:24:10 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-as-858-22-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 147537 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-08-10 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-08-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 14 R 714/15 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-14-r-714-15 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:24:08 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:24:08 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-14-r-714-15/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143483 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-08-10 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-08-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 47 BA 76/22 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-47-ba-76-22-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:39:53 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:39:53 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-47-ba-76-22-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140309 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-08-10 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-08-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 10 KR 80/22 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-10-kr-80-22-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:17:48 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:17:48 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-10-kr-80-22-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140307 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-08-10 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-08-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 17 R 294/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-17-r-294-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:17:46 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:17:46 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-17-r-294-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140305 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-08-10 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-08-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 3 KR 67/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-3-kr-67-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:17:44 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:17:44 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-3-kr-67-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150372 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-08-09 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-08-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 SO 71/22 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-so-71-22-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:50:08 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:50:08 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-so-71-22-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 147532 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-08-09 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-08-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 KR 700/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-kr-700-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:24:05 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:24:05 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-kr-700-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 147526 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-08-09 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-08-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 KR 925/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-kr-925-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:24:01 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:24:01 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-kr-925-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 147520 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-08-09 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-08-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 KR 851/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-kr-851-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:23:58 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:23:58 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-kr-851-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 147514 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-08-09 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-08-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 AS 752/22 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-as-752-22-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:23:55 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:23:55 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-as-752-22-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 157411 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-08-12 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-08-12 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 SB 1696/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-sb-1696-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:45:31 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:45:31 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-sb-1696-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 1dcf0e87a6f3a9e956a2b61ed3b14732 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:5de92351081e8cd91387d1935da2a2d8:0.41850100 1749469442 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.