| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Duisburg | S 44 KR 2258/18 | 11.11.2019 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 10 KR 907/19 | 19.04.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 49/21 B | 26.04.2022 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 9. August 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 39 KR 2226/17 | 24.01.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 5 KR 170/20 | 30.06.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 9. August 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Wiesbaden | S 19 U 72/19 | 05.12.2019 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 9 U 203/19 | 03.06.2022 | - | Sozialgericht Wiesbaden | 9. August 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Wiesbaden | S 19 U 72/19 | 05.12.2019 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 9 U 203/19 | 03.06.2022 | - | Sozialgericht Wiesbaden | 9. August 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Mannheim | S 4 KR 3011/2ß | 14.04.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 5 KR 1811/21 | 29.06.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 8. August 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 17 KR 1615/20 | 28.01.2022 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 5 KR 448/22 | 29.06.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 8. August 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 10 KR 6630/18 | 04.12.2020 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 5 KR 758/21 | 27.04.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 8. August 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Ulm | S 5 KR 3004/17 | 09.03.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 5 KR 1349/21 | 18.05.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 8. August 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Mannheim | S 9 SO 1382/19 | 10.12.2019 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 2 SO 126/20 | 22.06.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 8. August 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Reutlingen | S 4 SO 2749/20 | 08.09.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 2 SO 3221/21 | 22.06.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 8. August 2022 | ||
| - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 2 SO 2731/21 KL | 22.06.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 8. August 2022 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Münster | S 23 BA 47/19 | 17.11.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 8 BA 1/21 | 16.05.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 BA 19/22 B | 28.03.2023 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 8. August 2022 |
| Sozialgericht München | S 48 SO 305/19 | 10.03.2021 | - | - | Sozialgericht München | 8. August 2022 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Kassel | S 6 R 222/16 | 21.03.2019 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 R 101/19 | 04.04.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 5 R 8/22 R | - | Sozialgericht Kassel | 8. August 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Kassel | S 6 R 222/16 | 21.03.2019 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 R 101/19 | 04.04.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 5 R 8/22 R | - | Sozialgericht Kassel | 8. August 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Kassel | S 6 R 222/16 | 21.03.2019 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 R 101/19 | 04.04.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 5 R 8/22 R | - | Sozialgericht Kassel | 8. August 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 18 R 1111/16 | 07.10.2020 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 4 BA 3605/20 | 22.07.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 5. August 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Heilbronn | S 12 KR 3271/17 | 21.02.2020 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 4 KR 1405/20 | 22.07.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 5. August 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Reutlingen | S 5 SO 2414/17 | 10.01.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 2 SO 299/21 | 22.06.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 5. August 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 5 SO 2317/20 | 26.01.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 2 SO 571/21 | 22.06.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 5. August 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Ulm | S 9 U 2606/18 | 28.01.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 9 U 492/21 | 23.06.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 5. August 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Heilbronn | S 2 U 1011/20 | 21.12.2020 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 9 U 245/21 | 12.04.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 5. August 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 16 R 2165/17 | 26.09.2018 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 9 BA 3774/18 | 15.03.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 5. August 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Konstanz | S 9 R 1861/18 | 12.11.2020 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 9 R 4016/20 | 23.06.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 5. August 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 91 KR 2213/20 WA | 20.06.2022 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 4 KR 256/22 | - | - | Sozialgericht Berlin | 5. August 2022 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 206 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 206 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 206 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 5125, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 147508 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-08-09 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-08-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 KR 907/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-kr-907-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:23:52 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:23:52 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-kr-907-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 147503 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-08-09 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-08-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KR 170/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-kr-170-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:23:49 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:23:49 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-kr-170-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134668 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-08-09 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-08-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 19 U 72/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-19-u-72-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:23:44 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:23:44 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-19-u-72-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134663 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-08-09 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-08-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 U 203/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-u-203-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:23:42 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:23:42 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-u-203-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 157398 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-08-08 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-08-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KR 1811/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-kr-1811-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:45:22 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:45:22 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-kr-1811-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 157394 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-08-08 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-08-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KR 448/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-kr-448-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:45:19 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:45:19 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-kr-448-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 157391 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-08-08 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-08-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KR 758/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-kr-758-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:45:17 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:45:17 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-kr-758-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 157387 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-08-08 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-08-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KR 1349/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-kr-1349-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:45:15 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:45:15 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-kr-1349-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 157383 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-08-08 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-08-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 SO 126/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-so-126-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:45:12 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:45:12 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-so-126-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 157380 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-08-08 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-08-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 SO 3221/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-so-3221-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:45:10 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:45:10 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-so-3221-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 157376 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-08-08 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-08-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 SO 2731/21 KL [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-so-2731-21-kl [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:45:07 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:45:07 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-so-2731-21-kl/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 147498 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-08-08 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-08-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 BA 1/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-ba-1-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:23:47 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:23:47 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-ba-1-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143479 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-08-08 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-08-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 48 SO 305/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-48-so-305-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:39:51 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:39:51 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-48-so-305-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 139215 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-08-08 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-08-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 6 R 222/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-6-r-222-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:07:36 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:07:36 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-6-r-222-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 139210 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-08-08 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-08-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 R 101/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-r-101-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:07:34 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:07:34 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-r-101-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 139209 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-08-08 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-08-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 R 101/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-r-101-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:07:34 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:07:34 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-r-101-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 157372 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-08-05 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-08-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 BA 3605/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-ba-3605-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:45:05 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:45:05 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-ba-3605-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 157368 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-08-05 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-08-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 KR 1405/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-kr-1405-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:45:03 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:45:03 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-kr-1405-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 157364 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-08-05 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-08-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 SO 299/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-so-299-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:45:00 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:45:00 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-so-299-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 157360 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-08-05 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-08-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2SO 571/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2so-571-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:44:57 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:44:57 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2so-571-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 157356 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-08-05 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-08-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 U 492/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-u-492-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:44:55 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:44:55 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-u-492-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 157352 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-08-05 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-08-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 U 245/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-u-245-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:44:52 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:44:52 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-u-245-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 157348 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-08-05 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-08-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 BA 3774/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-ba-3774-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:44:49 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:44:49 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-ba-3774-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 157344 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-08-05 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-08-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 R 4016/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-r-4016-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:44:47 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:44:47 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-r-4016-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150206 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-08-05 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-08-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 91 KR 2213/20 WA [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-91-kr-2213-20-wa [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:48:20 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:48:20 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-91-kr-2213-20-wa/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 147508 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-08-09 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-08-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 KR 907/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-kr-907-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:23:52 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:23:52 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-kr-907-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => e43559e391f779ffcee83f4731283499 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:1c0c7e26d854d28da0dc5c3766be9481:0.39383800 1749354895 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.