| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Marburg | S 18 KA 52/16 | 01.08.2022 | - | - | Sozialgericht Marburg | 5. August 2022 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Marburg | S 17 KA 202/19 WA | 30.03.2022 | - | - | Sozialgericht Marburg | 5. August 2022 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Marburg | S 17 KA 201/19 WA | 30.03.2022 | - | - | Sozialgericht Marburg | 5. August 2022 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Marburg | S 17 KA 63/19 WA | 30.03.2022 | - | - | Sozialgericht Marburg | 5. August 2022 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 41 AS 1809/15 | 10.12.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 7 AS 326/21 | 03.06.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 7 AS 131/22 AR | 16.08.2022 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 5. August 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 5 AS 267/22 ER | 08.03.2022 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 7 SF 122/22 ER RG | 30.05.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 5. August 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 2 BA 7/21 ER | 22.06.2021 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 8 BA 91/21 B ER | 12.01.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 5. August 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Köln | S 40 R 803/17 | 15.05.2019 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 3 R 560/19 | 26.01.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 5. August 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 25 AS 938/19 | 10.03.2022 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 5 AS 611/22 B | 24.05.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 5. August 2022 | ||
| - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 11 SF 360/20 EK R | 23.03.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 10 ÜG 6/22 B | 29.11.2022 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 5. August 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Duisburg | S 53 AS 483/22 ER | 10.03.2022 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 6 AS 538/22 B ER, L 6 AS 539/22 B und L 6 SF 123/22 AB | 14.06.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 5. August 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Duisburg | S 50 KR 2264/18 | 19.06.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 11 KR 476/20 | 16.02.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 62/22 B | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 5. August 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 13 AL 572/18 | 28.07.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 9 AL 125/20 | 28.04.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 5. August 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 18 VG 40/08 | 25.03.2010 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 13 VG 52/10 | 25.05.2011 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 5. August 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 63 KR 306/16 | 24.05.2017 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 5 KR 448/17 | 12.07.2018 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 5. August 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Detmold | S 29 KR 3031/20 | 02.02.2022 | - | - | Sozialgericht Detmold | 4. August 2022 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Detmold | S 2 KR 1053/21 ER | 05.07.2021 | - | - | Sozialgericht Detmold | 4. August 2022 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Bayreuth | S 4 BL 3/17 | 20.01.2020 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 15 BL 6/20 | 17.05.2022 | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 4. August 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Augsburg | S 17 R 294/20 | 11.05.2021 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 13 R 326/21 | 24.11.2021 | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 4. August 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht München | S 47 BA 76/22 ER | 12.05.2022 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 BA 54/22 B ER | 26.07.2022 | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 4. August 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht München | S 47 BA 293/18 | 04.12.2018 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 BA 11/19 | 28.06.2022 | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 4. August 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 53 AS 6511/21 ER | 20.12.2021 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 14 AS 1563/21 B ER | 09.02.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 4. August 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 7 SO 1522/18 | 23.07.2018 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 7 SO 3313/18 | 09.07.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 8 SO 14/20 R | 16.02.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | 4. August 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 195 SO 2948/13 | 09.08.2016 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 15 SO 245/16 | 13.02.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 8 SO 3/20 R | 16.02.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | 4. August 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 2 KA 188/17 | 23.05.2018 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 11 KA 50/18 | 11.03.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | B 6 KA 12/21 R | 06.04.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | 4. August 2022 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 207 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 207 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 207 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 5150, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149706 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-08-05 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-08-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 18 KA 52/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-18-ka-52-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:43:43 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:43:43 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-18-ka-52-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149701 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-08-05 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-08-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 17 KA 202/19 WA [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-17-ka-202-19-wa [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:43:40 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:43:40 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-17-ka-202-19-wa/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149694 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-08-05 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-08-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 17 KA 201/19 WA [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-17-ka-201-19-wa [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:43:37 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:43:37 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-17-ka-201-19-wa/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149690 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-08-05 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-08-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 17 KA 63/19 WA [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-17-ka-63-19-wa [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:43:35 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:43:35 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-17-ka-63-19-wa/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 147494 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-08-05 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-08-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 AS 326/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-as-326-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:23:44 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:23:44 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-as-326-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 147489 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-08-05 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-08-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 SF 122/22 ER RG [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-sf-122-22-er-rg [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:23:42 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:23:42 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-sf-122-22-er-rg/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 147484 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-08-05 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-08-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 BA 91/21 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-ba-91-21-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:23:39 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:23:39 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-ba-91-21-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 147479 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-08-05 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-08-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 R 560/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-r-560-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:23:37 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:23:37 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-r-560-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 147474 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-08-05 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-08-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 AS 611/22 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-as-611-22-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:23:34 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:23:34 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-as-611-22-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 147469 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-08-05 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-08-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 SF 360/20 EK R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-sf-360-20-ek-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:23:32 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:23:32 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-sf-360-20-ek-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 147464 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-08-05 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-08-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 AS 538/22 B ER, L 6 AS 539/22 B und L 6 SF 123/22 AB [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-as-538-22-b-er-l-6-as-539-22-b-und-l-6-sf-123-22-ab [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:23:28 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:23:28 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-as-538-22-b-er-l-6-as-539-22-b-und-l-6-sf-123-22-ab/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 147459 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-08-05 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-08-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 KR 476/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-kr-476-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:23:26 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:23:26 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-kr-476-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 147454 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-08-05 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-08-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 AL 125/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-al-125-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:23:24 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:23:24 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-al-125-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 147448 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-08-05 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-08-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 13 VG 52/10 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-13-vg-52-10 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:23:21 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:23:21 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-13-vg-52-10/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 147442 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-08-05 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-08-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KR 448/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-kr-448-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:23:17 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:23:17 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-kr-448-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140282 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-08-04 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-08-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 29 KR 3031/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-29-kr-3031-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:17:21 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:17:21 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-29-kr-3031-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140280 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-08-04 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-08-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 2 KR 1053/21 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-2-kr-1053-21-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:17:20 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:17:20 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-2-kr-1053-21-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130709 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-08-04 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-08-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 15 BL 6/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-15-bl-6-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:08:23 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:08:23 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-15-bl-6-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130708 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-08-04 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-08-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 13 R 326/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-13-r-326-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:08:21 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:08:21 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-13-r-326-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130707 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-08-04 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-08-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 BA 54/22 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-ba-54-22-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:08:20 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:08:20 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-ba-54-22-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130706 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-08-04 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-08-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 BA 11/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-ba-11-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:08:18 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:08:18 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-ba-11-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128173 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-08-04 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-08-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 14 AS 1563/21 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-14-as-1563-21-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:37:13 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:37:13 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-14-as-1563-21-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87809 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-08-04 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-08-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 8 SO 14/20 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-8-so-14-20-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:11:25 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:11:25 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-8-so-14-20-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87808 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-08-04 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-08-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 8 SO 3/20 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-8-so-3-20-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:11:24 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:11:24 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-8-so-3-20-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87807 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-08-04 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-08-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 6 KA 12/21 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-6-ka-12-21-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:11:22 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:11:22 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-6-ka-12-21-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149706 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-08-05 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-08-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 18 KA 52/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-18-ka-52-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:43:43 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:43:43 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-18-ka-52-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 74233ab336937529fd85c813eb2e73d7 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:41fd257e4cc696eda47a62eaaf5a1409:0.10679700 1749367289 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.