| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 58 AL 520/19 | 01.07.2022 | - | - | Sozialgericht Berlin | 3. August 2022 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Kassel | S 1 U 90/14 | 10.11.2015 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 U 205/18 | 28.06.2022 | - | Sozialgericht Kassel | 3. August 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Kassel | S 1 U 90/14 | 10.11.2015 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 U 205/18 | 28.06.2022 | - | Sozialgericht Kassel | 3. August 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Fulda | S 7 SO 10/18 | 14.04.2021 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 SO 124/21 | 01.06.2022 | - | Sozialgericht Fulda | 3. August 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Heilbronn | S 11 R 2769/18 | 13.04.2020 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 10 R 1623/20 | 20.01.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 2. August 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Mannheim | S 9 U 493/17 | 09.07.2019 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 9 U 2760/19 | 20.01.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 2. August 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Mannheim | S 13 AS 473/20 | 06.05.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 3 AS 2051/21 | 24.11.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 2. August 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 3 U 51/16 | 18.09.2019 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 3 U 4197/19 | 24.11.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 2. August 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Mannheim | S 8 R 3668/19 | 30.09.2020 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 13 R 3303/20 | 11.01.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 2. August 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 11 SB 4218/18 | 30.07.2020 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 6 SB 3030/20 | 09.12.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 2. August 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | S 52 R 553/18 | 16.02.2021 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 3 R 299/21 | 30.11.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | B 5 R 4/22 B | 15.07.2022 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 2. August 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | S 2 SO 296/17 | 12.03.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 9 SO 155/20 | 13.01.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 8 SO 4/22 R | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 2. August 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 34 KR 815/22 ER | 21.04.2022 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 KR 125/22 B ER | 04.07.2022 | - | Sozialgericht Frankfurt | 1. August 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 34 KR 815/22 ER | 21.04.2022 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 KR 125/22 B ER | 04.07.2022 | - | Sozialgericht Frankfurt | 1. August 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Fulda | S 8 U 34/15 | 16.12.2019 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 U 12/20 | 28.06.2022 | - | Sozialgericht Fulda | 1. August 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Fulda | S 8 U 34/15 | 16.12.2019 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 U 12/20 | 28.06.2022 | - | Sozialgericht Fulda | 1. August 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 2 R 1374/20 | 19.03.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 5 R 1399/21 | 27.04.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 29. Juli 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 10 U 3052/19 | 24.03.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 8 U 1273/21 | 20.05.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 29. Juli 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Mannheim | S 17 AS 2603/21 | 17.03.2022 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 3 AS 1216/22 B | 09.05.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 29. Juli 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Reutlingen | S 8 EG 1833/21 | 26.01.2022 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 11 EG 543/22 | 12.07.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 29. Juli 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 5 KR 3963/20 | 10.08.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 11 KR 2845/21 | 12.07.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 29. Juli 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Mannheim | S 4 KR 1660/20 | 01.12.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 11 KR 98/22 | 12.07.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 29. Juli 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Mannheim | S 19 KR 2552/21 ER | 09.12.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 4 KR 95/22 ER-B | 05.07.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 29. Juli 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 18 P 4595/19 | 25.06.2020 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 4 P 2403/20 | 24.06.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 29. Juli 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 10 U 3504/19 | 23.10.2020 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 1 U 377/21 | 27.06.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 29. Juli 2022 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 208 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 208 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 208 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 5175, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150203 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-08-03 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-08-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 58 AL 520/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-58-al-520-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:48:18 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:48:18 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-58-al-520-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 139204 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-08-03 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-08-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 1 U 90/14 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-1-u-90-14 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:07:32 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:07:32 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-1-u-90-14/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 139200 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-08-03 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-08-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 U 205/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-u-205-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:07:30 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:07:30 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-u-205-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134587 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-08-03 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-08-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 SO 124/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-so-124-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:23:15 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:23:15 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-so-124-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 157340 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-08-02 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-08-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 R 1623/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-r-1623-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:44:44 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:44:44 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-r-1623-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 157336 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-08-02 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-08-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 U 2760/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-u-2760-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:44:41 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:44:41 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-u-2760-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 157331 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-08-02 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-08-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 AS 2051/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-as-2051-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:44:37 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:44:37 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-as-2051-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 157327 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-08-02 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-08-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 U 4197/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-u-4197-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:44:35 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:44:35 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-u-4197-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 157323 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-08-02 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-08-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 13 R 3303/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-13-r-3303-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:44:32 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:44:32 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-13-r-3303-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 157318 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-08-02 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-08-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 SB 3030/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-sb-3030-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:44:29 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:44:29 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-sb-3030-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 147438 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-08-02 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-08-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 R 299/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-r-299-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:23:15 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:23:15 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-r-299-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 147432 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-08-02 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-08-02 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 SO 155/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-so-155-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:23:11 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:23:11 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-so-155-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 136867 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-08-01 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-08-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 KR 125/22 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-kr-125-22-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:41:29 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:41:29 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-kr-125-22-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 136862 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-08-01 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-08-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 34 KR 815/22 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-34-kr-815-22-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:41:27 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:41:27 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-34-kr-815-22-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134582 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-08-01 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-08-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 U 12/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-u-12-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:23:14 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:23:14 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-u-12-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 134578 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-08-01 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-08-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 8 U 34/15 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-8-u-34-15 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:23:12 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:23:12 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-8-u-34-15/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 157314 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-07-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-07-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 R 1399/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-r-1399-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:44:27 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:44:27 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-r-1399-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 157311 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-07-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-07-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 U 1273/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-u-1273-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:44:24 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:44:24 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-u-1273-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 157307 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-07-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-07-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 AS 1216/22 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-as-1216-22-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:44:21 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:44:21 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-as-1216-22-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 157303 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-07-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-07-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 EG 543/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-eg-543-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:44:19 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:44:19 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-eg-543-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 157299 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-07-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-07-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 KR 2845/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-kr-2845-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:44:16 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:44:16 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-kr-2845-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 157295 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-07-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-07-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 KR 98/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-kr-98-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:44:13 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:44:13 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-kr-98-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 157291 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-07-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-07-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 KR 95/22 ER-B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-kr-95-22-er-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:44:10 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:44:10 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-kr-95-22-er-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 157286 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-07-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-07-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 P 2403/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-p-2403-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:44:07 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:44:07 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-p-2403-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 157282 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-07-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-07-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 U 377/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-u-377-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:44:05 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:44:05 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-u-377-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150203 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-08-03 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-08-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 58 AL 520/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-58-al-520-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:48:18 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:48:18 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-58-al-520-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 0a22098ed72b704b6a1742e0ba9cba80 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:d31beb35a2cc5f1b0aeb6aeeed93524e:0.07554400 1749374213 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.