| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Bremen | S 47 R 233/16 | 31.07.2020 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 2/12 R 115/20 | 20.06.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 29. Juli 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Braunschweig | S 36 R 271/19 | 07.12.2020 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 2 R 16/21 | 02.05.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 29. Juli 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Hannover | S 20 KA 302/16 | 22.05.2019 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 3 KA 36/19 | 02.02.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 29. Juli 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Hildesheim | S 27 AY 4030/20 ER | 25.01.2021 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 8 AY 11/21 B ER | 27.07.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 29. Juli 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Osnabrück | S 4 SO 20/21 ER | 29.03.2021 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 8 SO 79/21 B ER | 27.07.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 29. Juli 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Bremen | S 62 KR 99/18 | 19.03.2021 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 16 KR 183/21 | 05.07.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 29. Juli 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Hannover | S 24 KA 169/17 | 26.06.2019 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 3 KA 46/19 | 25.05.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 29. Juli 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Osnabrück | S 5 SO 8/18 | 26.02.2019 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 8 SO 89/19 | 10.12.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 29. Juli 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Hannover | S 24 KA 169/17 | 26.06.2019 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 3 KA 46/19 | 25.05.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 29. Juli 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Osnabrück | S 5 SO 8/18 | 26.02.2019 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 8 SO 89/19 | 10.12.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 29. Juli 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 4 R 1280/18 ZV | 07.01.2022 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 R 76/22 ZV | 14.07.2022 | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 28. Juli 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Leipzig | S 11 R 526/18 ZV | 30.09.2021 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 R 513/21 ZV | 14.07.2022 | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 28. Juli 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Chemnitz | S 12 AL 313/20 | 28.04.2021 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 AL 42/21 | 09.06.2022 | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 28. Juli 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Reutlingen | S 3 R 1687/18 | 21.02.2020 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 11 R 744/20 | 27.06.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 28. Juli 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 7 BA 5390/18 | 01.10.2020 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 11 BA 3585/20 | 27.06.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 28. Juli 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 62 AL 4518/15 | 15.01.2020 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 14 AL 20/20 | 26.11.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 11 AL 4/21 R | 29.03.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | 28. Juli 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 146 SO 3432/12 | 11.08.2017 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 15 SO 232/17 | 07.02.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 8 SO 1/20 R | 16.02.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | 28. Juli 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Oldenburg | S 51 R 111/17 | 08.10.2019 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 12 R 143/19 | 23.07.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 5 R 24/21 R | 07.04.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | 28. Juli 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Meiningen | S 16 KR 625/14 | 27.01.2015 | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | L 6 KR 504/15 | 27.11.2018 | Bundessozialgericht | B 3 KR 9/20 R | 17.02.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | 28. Juli 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Speyer | S 7 KR 396/17 | 06.05.2019 | Landessozialgericht Rheinland-Pfalz | L 5 KR 101/19 | 09.07.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 30/20 R | 10.03.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | 28. Juli 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 28 KR 1213/22 ER | 25.07.2022 | - | - | Sozialgericht Berlin | 27. Juli 2022 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 123 AS 5265/20 | 08.06.2022 | - | - | Sozialgericht Berlin | 27. Juli 2022 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Duisburg | S 49 AS 860/21 | 14.04.2021 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 7 AS 622/21 | 09.06.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 4 AS 72/22 B | 30.09.2022 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 27. Juli 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Münster | S 7 KR 1060/17 | 20.11.2019 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 11 KR 114/20 | 16.02.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 27. Juli 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Münster | S 11 SO 98/17 | 07.03.2019 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 9 SO 136/19 | 10.03.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 27. Juli 2022 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 209 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 209 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 209 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 5200, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 138253 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-07-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-07-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2/12 R 115/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-12-r-115-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:01:36 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:01:36 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-12-r-115-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 138248 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-07-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-07-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 R 16/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-r-16-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:01:35 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:01:35 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-r-16-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 138243 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-07-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-07-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 KA 36/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-ka-36-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:01:33 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:01:33 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-ka-36-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 138230 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-07-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-07-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 AY 11/21 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-ay-11-21-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:01:29 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:01:29 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-ay-11-21-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 138225 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-07-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-07-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 SO 79/21 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-so-79-21-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:01:27 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:01:27 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-so-79-21-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 138221 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-07-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-07-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 16 KR 183/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-16-kr-183-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:01:25 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:01:25 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-16-kr-183-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 138216 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-07-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-07-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 KA 46/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-ka-46-19-3 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:01:24 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:01:24 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-ka-46-19-3/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 138211 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-07-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-07-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 SO 89/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-so-89-19-3 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:01:22 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:01:22 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-so-89-19-3/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 138207 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-07-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-07-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 KA 46/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-ka-46-19-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:01:20 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:01:20 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-ka-46-19-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 138202 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-07-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-07-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 SO 89/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-so-89-19-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:01:18 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:01:18 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-so-89-19-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160764 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-07-28 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-07-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 R 76/22 ZV [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-r-76-22-zv [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:26:54 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:26:54 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-r-76-22-zv/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160761 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-07-28 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-07-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 R 513/21 ZV [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-r-513-21-zv [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:26:52 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:26:52 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-r-513-21-zv/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160758 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-07-28 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-07-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 AL 42/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-al-42-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:26:49 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:26:49 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-al-42-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 157277 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-07-28 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-07-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 R 744/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-r-744-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:44:01 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:44:01 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-r-744-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 157272 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-07-28 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-07-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 BA 3585/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-ba-3585-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:43:58 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:43:58 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-ba-3585-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87806 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-07-28 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-07-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 11 AL 4/21 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-11-al-4-21-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:11:21 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:11:21 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-11-al-4-21-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87805 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-07-28 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-07-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 8 SO 1/20 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-8-so-1-20-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:11:19 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:11:19 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-8-so-1-20-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87804 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-07-28 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-07-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 5 R 24/21 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-5-r-24-21-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:11:17 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:11:17 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-5-r-24-21-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87803 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-07-28 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-07-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 3 KR 9/20 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-3-kr-9-20-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:11:16 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:11:16 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-3-kr-9-20-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87802 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-07-28 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-07-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 1 KR 30/20 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-1-kr-30-20-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:11:15 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:11:15 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-1-kr-30-20-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150199 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-07-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-07-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 28 KR 1213/22 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-28-kr-1213-22-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:48:15 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:48:15 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-28-kr-1213-22-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150195 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-07-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-07-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 123 AS 5265/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-123-as-5265-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:48:13 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:48:13 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-123-as-5265-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 147427 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-07-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-07-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 AS 622/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-as-622-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:23:09 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:23:09 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-as-622-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 147422 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-07-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-07-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 KR 114/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-kr-114-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:23:06 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:23:06 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-kr-114-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 147417 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-07-27 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-07-27 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 SO 136/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-so-136-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:23:03 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:23:03 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-so-136-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 138253 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-07-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-07-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2/12 R 115/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-12-r-115-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:01:36 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:01:36 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-12-r-115-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 6a8cce9853fe80d74bca625091305c9b [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:8b8d85d722cc4269fe76232436cd3d05:0.26291200 1749390589 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.