| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 9 BA 31/21 ER | 20.07.2021 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 8 BA 107/21 B ER | 04.04.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 25. Juli 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 2 SB 237/09 | 03.11.2010 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 13 SB 328/10 | 22.02.2011 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 25. Juli 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 2 SB 237/09 | 03.11.2010 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 13 SB 328/10 | 22.02.2011 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 25. Juli 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 76 KR 1600/17 | 22.02.2019 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 28 BA 23/19 | 29.06.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 25. Juli 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Schleswig | S 2 AS 27/22 ER | 25.05.2022 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 AS 51/22 B ER | 07.07.2022 | - | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | 24. Juli 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Kiel | S 2 KA 573/15 | 05.12.2018 | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 KA 77/18 | 22.02.2022 | - | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | 24. Juli 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | S 42 VG 288/17 | 19.08.2021 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 15 VG 51/21 B | 10.01.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 22. Juli 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Hannover | S 24 KA 169/17 | 26.06.2019 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 3 KA 46/19 | 25.05.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 22. Juli 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Osnabrück | S 5 SO 8/18 | 26.02.2019 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 8 SO 89/19 | 10.12.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 22. Juli 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Braunschweig | S 18 AS 1162/19 | 25.02.2021 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 9 AS 257/21 | 05.05.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 22. Juli 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Braunschweig | S 8 SB 517/15 | 19.04.2018 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 10 SB 106/18 | 28.04.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 22. Juli 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Osnabrück | S 24 AS 22/21 | 10.01.2022 | - | - | Sozialgericht Osnabrück | 22. Juli 2022 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Lüneburg | S 3 U 144/20 | 26.04.2022 | - | - | Sozialgericht Lüneburg | 22. Juli 2022 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 58 AL 1290/18 | 09.08.2019 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 14 AL 102/19 | 09.06.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 22. Juli 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt (Oder) | S 5 KR 61/22 ER | 16.05.2022 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 1 KR 175/22 B ER | 06.07.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 22. Juli 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 37 AS 18167/16 | 15.06.2018 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 1 AS 1271/18 | 11.04.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 22. Juli 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 166 KR 3426/18 | 08.01.2020 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 9 KR 233/20 | 27.04.0022 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 22. Juli 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 87 KA 148/19 | 25.04.2022 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 7 KA 12/22 B | 30.06.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 22. Juli 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt (Oder) | S 4 KR 534/15 | 09.06.2017 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 1 KR 125/20 WA | 04.05.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 22. Juli 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 201 AS 328/16 | 24.04.2018 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 1 AS 846/18 | 04.05.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 22. Juli 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 77 AS 16415/17 | 25.05.2018 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 1 AS 1227/18 | 04.05.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 22. Juli 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Neuruppin | S 43 AS 79/22 ER | 05.04.2022 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 1 AS 382/22 B ER | 26.06.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 22. Juli 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 96 AS 24117/14 | 23.01.2019 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 9 AS 400/19 | 07.04.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 22. Juli 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 117 AS 283/21 ER | 28.02.2022 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 9 AS 216/22 B ER | 30.03.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 22. Juli 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Neuruppin | S 6 AS 1109/14 | 24.09.2018 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 1 AS 2112/18 | 16.03.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 22. Juli 2022 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 211 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 211 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 211 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 5250, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 147312 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-07-25 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-07-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 BA 107/21 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-ba-107-21-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:22:09 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:22:09 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-ba-107-21-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 147307 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-07-25 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-07-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 13 SB 328/10 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-13-sb-328-10-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:22:06 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:22:06 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-13-sb-328-10-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 147306 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-07-25 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-07-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 13 SB 328/10 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-13-sb-328-10 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:22:06 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:22:06 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-13-sb-328-10/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128170 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-07-25 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-07-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 28 BA 23/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-28-ba-23-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:37:11 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:37:11 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-28-ba-23-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150368 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-07-24 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-07-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 AS 51/22 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-as-51-22-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:50:06 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:50:06 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-as-51-22-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150364 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-07-24 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-07-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 KA 77/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-ka-77-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:50:03 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:50:03 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-ka-77-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 147302 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-07-22 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-07-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 15 VG 51/21 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-15-vg-51-21-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:22:04 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:22:04 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-15-vg-51-21-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 138197 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-07-22 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-07-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 KA 46/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-ka-46-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:01:17 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:01:17 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-ka-46-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 138193 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-07-22 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-07-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 SO 89/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-so-89-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:01:15 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:01:15 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-so-89-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 138189 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-07-22 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-07-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 AS 257/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-as-257-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:01:13 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:01:13 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-as-257-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 138184 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-07-22 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-07-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 SB 106/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-sb-106-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:01:12 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:01:12 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-sb-106-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 131010 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-07-22 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-07-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 24 AS 22/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-24-as-22-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 00:52:07 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 23:52:07 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-24-as-22-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130936 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-07-22 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-07-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 3 U 144/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-3-u-144-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 00:50:30 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 23:50:30 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-3-u-144-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128167 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-07-22 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-07-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 14 AL 102/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-14-al-102-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:37:08 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:37:08 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-14-al-102-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128164 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-07-22 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-07-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 175/22 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-175-22-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:37:07 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:37:07 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-175-22-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128161 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-07-22 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-07-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 AS 1271/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-as-1271-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:37:04 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:37:04 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-as-1271-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128158 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-07-22 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-07-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 KR 233/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-kr-233-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:37:03 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:37:03 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-kr-233-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128155 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-07-22 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-07-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 KA 12/22 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-ka-12-22-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:37:01 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:37:01 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-ka-12-22-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128152 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-07-22 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-07-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 125/20 WA [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-125-20-wa [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:36:59 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:36:59 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-125-20-wa/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128147 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-07-22 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-07-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 AS 846/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-as-846-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:36:57 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:36:57 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-as-846-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128145 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-07-22 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-07-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 AS 1227/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-as-1227-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:36:55 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:36:55 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-as-1227-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128142 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-07-22 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-07-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 AS 382/22 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-as-382-22-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:36:54 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:36:54 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-as-382-22-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128140 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-07-22 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-07-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 AS 400/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-as-400-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:36:52 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:36:52 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-as-400-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128137 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-07-22 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-07-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 AS 216/22 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-as-216-22-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:36:51 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:36:51 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-as-216-22-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128133 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-07-22 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-07-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 AS 2112/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-as-2112-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:36:48 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:36:48 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-as-2112-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 147312 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-07-25 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-07-25 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 BA 107/21 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-ba-107-21-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:22:09 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:22:09 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-ba-107-21-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => cdc8ed5c8ed57ffca4c1690a5e6a3d94 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:545450d284be62e02d0256e08cf06444:0.11307400 1749405197 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.