| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 211 KR 2330/16 | 06.03.2019 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 9 BA 32/19 | 02.03.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 22. Juli 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 18 AS 3074/21 ER | 01.06.2022 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 6 AS 215/22 B ER | 28.04.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 21. Juli 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Köln | S 9 P 3/19 | 13.07.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 5 P 78/20 | 05.05.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 21. Juli 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Augsburg | S 10 KR 80/22 ER | 05.04.2022 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 KR 209/22 B ER | 05.07.2022 | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 21. Juli 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Augsburg | S 5 U 281/12 | 19.03.2013 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 2 U 140/13 | 11.05.2022 | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 21. Juli 2022 | ||
| - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 37 SF 276/19 EK AL | 06.11.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 10 ÜG 2/20 R | 24.03.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | 21. Juli 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Potsdam | S 15 KR 172/17 | 14.03.2018 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 1 KR 146/18 | 18.09.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 3 KR 17/20 R | 17.02.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | 21. Juli 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 134 AS 8396/20 | 15.06.2022 | - | - | Sozialgericht Berlin | 20. Juli 2022 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Duisburg | S 49 AS 561/21, S 49 AS 2367/21, S 49 AS 2565/21 | 18.03.2022 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 5 AS 456/22 B, L 5 AS 457/22 B, L 5 AS 458/22 B | 19.05.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 20. Juli 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Aachen | S 7 AS 696/19 | 03.05.2021 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 6 AS 947/21 | 16.12.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | B 7 AS 11/22 R | 21.06.2023 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 20. Juli 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Duisburg | S 15 P 419/20 | 19.01.2022 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 5 P 23/22 NZB | 02.05.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 20. Juli 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Aachen | S 20 SO 89/20 | 07.04.2022 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 9 SO 139/21 | 07.04.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 20. Juli 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Köln | S 23 KR 1044/17 | 13.07.2018 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 11 KR 542/18 | 24.03.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 44/21 B | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 20. Juli 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Duisburg | S 59 KR 1987/19 | 24.08.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 11 KR 637/20 | 22.12.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 7/22 B | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 20. Juli 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Altenburg | S 5 KR 1622/18 | 27.05.2019 | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | L 2 KR 894/19 | 21.04.2022 | - | Sozialgericht Altenburg | 20. Juli 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 33 BK 31/20 | 15.04.2021 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 BK 10/21 | 23.06.2022 | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 18. Juli 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Chemnitz | S 22 AS 2940/16 | 02.02.2017 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 AS 263/17 | 17.03.2022 | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 18. Juli 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Nordhausen | S 13 AS 1600/20 | 08.06.2022 | - | - | Sozialgericht Nordhausen | 18. Juli 2022 | ||||
| Thüringer Landessozialgericht | L 2 EG 1158/18 | 02.02.2021 | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | L 1 SF 396/21 E | 10.05.2022 | - | Sozialgericht Nordhausen | 18. Juli 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 2 AL 2473/20 | 10.05.2022 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 13 AL 1618/22 | - | - | Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | 15. Juli 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Osnabrück | S 26 EG 2/21 | 17.01.2022 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 2 EG 1/22 | 02.05.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 15. Juli 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Hannover | S 58 U 6/16 | 16.03.2020 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 3 U 81/20 | 27.04.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 15. Juli 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Oldenburg | S 8 BA 383/18 | 29.01.2020 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 12 BA 3/20 | 24.03.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 15. Juli 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Regensburg | S 14 KR 1197/20 | 11.03.2021 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 5 KR 136/21 | 29.09.2021 | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 15. Juli 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 25 BK 2832/12 | 21.09.2017 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 7 BK 4174/17 | 22.10.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 7/14 KG 1/20 R | 09.03.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | 15. Juli 2022 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 212 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 212 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 212 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 5275, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128130 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-07-22 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-07-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 BA 32/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-ba-32-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:36:46 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:36:46 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-ba-32-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 147298 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-07-21 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-07-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 AS 215/22 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-as-215-22-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:22:01 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:22:01 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-as-215-22-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 147293 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-07-21 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-07-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 P 78/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-p-78-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:21:58 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:21:58 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-p-78-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130705 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-07-21 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-07-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KR 209/22 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-kr-209-22-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:08:17 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:08:17 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-kr-209-22-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130704 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-07-21 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-07-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 U 140/13 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-u-140-13 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:08:15 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:08:15 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-u-140-13/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87801 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-07-21 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-07-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 10 ÜG 2/20 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-10-ueg-2-20-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:11:13 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:11:13 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-10-ueg-2-20-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87800 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-07-21 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-07-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 3 KR 17/20 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-3-kr-17-20-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:11:12 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:11:12 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-3-kr-17-20-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150178 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-07-20 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-07-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 134 AS 8396/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-134-as-8396-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:48:03 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:48:03 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-134-as-8396-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 147288 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-07-20 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-07-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 AS 456/22 B, L 5 AS 457/22 B, L 5 AS 458/22 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-as-456-22-b-l-5-as-457-22-b-l-5-as-458-22-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:21:56 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:21:56 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-as-456-22-b-l-5-as-457-22-b-l-5-as-458-22-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 147282 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-07-20 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-07-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 AS 947/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-as-947-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:21:53 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:21:53 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-as-947-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 147277 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-07-20 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-07-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 P 23/22 NZB [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-p-23-22-nzb [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:21:50 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:21:50 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-p-23-22-nzb/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 147273 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-07-20 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-07-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 SO 139/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-so-139-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:21:48 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:21:48 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-so-139-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 147268 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-07-20 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-07-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 KR 542/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-kr-542-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:21:46 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:21:46 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-kr-542-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 147263 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-07-20 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-07-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 KR 637/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-kr-637-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:21:43 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:21:43 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-kr-637-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 132185 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-07-20 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-07-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 KR 894/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-kr-894-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:04:38 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:04:38 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-kr-894-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160755 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-07-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-07-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 BK 10/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-bk-10-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:26:47 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:26:47 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-bk-10-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160752 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-07-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-07-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 AS 263/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-as-263-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:26:44 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:26:44 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-as-263-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 131891 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-07-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-07-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 13 AS 1600/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-13-as-1600-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:02:38 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:02:38 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-13-as-1600-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 131887 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-07-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-07-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 SF 396/21 E [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-sf-396-21-e [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:02:36 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:02:36 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-sf-396-21-e/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140078 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-07-15 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-07-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 2 AL 2473/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-2-al-2473-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:14:42 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:14:42 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-2-al-2473-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 138179 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-07-15 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-07-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 EG 1/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-eg-1-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:01:10 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:01:10 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-eg-1-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 138174 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-07-15 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-07-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 U 81/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-u-81-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:01:08 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:01:08 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-u-81-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 138169 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-07-15 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-07-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 12 BA 3/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-12-ba-3-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:01:07 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:01:07 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-12-ba-3-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130703 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-07-15 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-07-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KR 136/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-kr-136-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:08:12 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:08:12 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-kr-136-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87799 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-07-15 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-07-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 7/14 KG 1/20 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-7-14-kg-1-20-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:11:09 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:11:09 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-7-14-kg-1-20-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128130 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-07-22 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-07-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 BA 32/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-ba-32-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:36:46 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:36:46 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-ba-32-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => ddc9e1706773d273901bd54179576a99 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:a937f23101a1d49aeee97445a290a5e5:0.49532500 1749422184 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.