| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Hannover | S 20 KA 171/17 | 09.10.2019 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 3 KA 57/19 | 02.02.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 8. Juli 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Hildesheim | S 11 U 52/19 | 19.11.2020 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 3 U 2/21 | 23.03.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 8. Juli 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Hildesheim | S 11 U 52/19 | 19.11.2020 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 3 U 2/21 | 23.03.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 8. Juli 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Hildesheim | S 24 AS 4168/21 ER | 12.12.2021 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 11 AS 18/22 B ER | 01.04.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 8. Juli 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Hildesheim | S 24 AS 4168/21 ER | 12.12.2021 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 11 AS 18/22 B ER | 01.04.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 8. Juli 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Aurich | S 55 AS 66/17 | 27.10.2020 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 13 AS 182/20 | 23.02.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 8. Juli 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Oldenburg | S 63 KR 70/19 | 28.08.2019 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 16 KR 414/19 | 15.03.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 8. Juli 2022 | ||
| - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 12 P 25/20 KL | 24.02.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 8. Juli 2022 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Stade | S 7 U 175/17 | 04.05.2020 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 14 U 133/20 | 03.02.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 8. Juli 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 30 AY 8/22 ER | 26.04.2022 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 AY 13/22 B ER | 23.06.2022 | - | Sozialgericht Frankfurt | 8. Juli 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 30 AY 8/22 ER | 26.04.2022 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 AY 13/22 B ER | 23.06.2022 | - | Sozialgericht Frankfurt | 8. Juli 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Osnabrück | S 43 AL 100/20 | 17.03.2022 | - | - | Sozialgericht Osnabrück | 8. Juli 2022 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Leipzig | S 11 R 782/19 KN | 25.02.2020 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 R 284/20 KN | 10.05.2022 | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 7. Juli 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 204 AS 638/22 ER | 05.04.2022 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 8 AS 449/22 B ER | 24.05.2022 | - | Sozialgericht Berlin | 7. Juli 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 212 SO 938/13 | 19.10.2018 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 15 SO 294/18 | 20.05.2022 | - | Sozialgericht Berlin | 7. Juli 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Marburg | S 10 SF 58/21 E | 01.07.2022 | - | - | Sozialgericht Marburg | 7. Juli 2022 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | S 35 VG 1150/16 | 19.08.2021 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 15 VG 17/22 B | 09.05.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 7. Juli 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Detmold | S 15 AS 34/22 ER | 21.02.2022 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 2 AS 395/22 B ER | 02.05.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 7. Juli 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | S 18 R 530/18 | 25.08.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 18 R 761/20 | 01.02.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 R 4/22 R | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 7. Juli 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt (Oder) | S 17 AS 446/20 | 28.08.2020 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 32 AS 1379/20 | 18.05.2022 | - | Sozialgericht Frankfurt (Oder) | 7. Juli 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt (Oder) | S 17 AS 229/21 | 12.01.2022 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 3 AS 150/22 NZB | 13.06.2022 | - | Sozialgericht Frankfurt (Oder) | 7. Juli 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Cottbus | S 10 AS 179/20 WA | 17.11.2021 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 3 AS 23/22 | 23.05.2022 | - | Sozialgericht Cottbus | 7. Juli 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht München | S 45 AS 450/20 | 11.08.2020 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 AS 560/20 | 07.04.2022 | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 7. Juli 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht München | S 45 AS 440/20 | 13.08.2020 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 AS 559/20 | 07.04.2022 | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 7. Juli 2022 | ||
| - | Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht | L 12 SF 75/18 EK | 19.03.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | B 10 ÜG 4/21 R | 24.03.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | 7. Juli 2022 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 214 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 214 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 214 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 5325, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 138160 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-07-08 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-07-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 KA 57/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-ka-57-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:01:03 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:01:03 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-ka-57-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 138155 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-07-08 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-07-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 U 2/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-u-2-21-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:01:01 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:01:01 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-u-2-21-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 138154 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-07-08 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-07-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 U 2/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-u-2-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:01:01 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:01:01 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-u-2-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 138149 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-07-08 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-07-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 AS 18/22 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-as-18-22-b-er-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:00:59 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:00:59 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-as-18-22-b-er-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 138148 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-07-08 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-07-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 AS 18/22 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-as-18-22-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:00:59 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:00:59 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-as-18-22-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 138142 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-07-08 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-07-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 13 AS 182/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-13-as-182-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:00:57 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:00:57 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-13-as-182-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 138137 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-07-08 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-07-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 16 KR 414/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-16-kr-414-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:00:55 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:00:55 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-16-kr-414-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 138132 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-07-08 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-07-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 12 P 25/20 KL [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-12-p-25-20-kl [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:00:53 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:00:53 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-12-p-25-20-kl/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 138125 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-07-08 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-07-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 14 U 133/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-14-u-133-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:00:51 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:00:51 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-14-u-133-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 136850 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-07-08 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-07-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 AY 13/22 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-ay-13-22-b-er-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:41:23 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:41:23 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-ay-13-22-b-er-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 136849 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-07-08 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-07-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 AY 13/22 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-ay-13-22-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:41:23 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:41:23 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-ay-13-22-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 131008 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-07-08 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-07-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 43 AL 100/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-43-al-100-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 00:52:05 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 23:52:05 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-43-al-100-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160749 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-07-07 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-07-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 R 284/20 KN [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-r-284-20-kn [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:26:42 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:26:42 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-r-284-20-kn/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150174 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-07-07 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-07-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 AS 449/22 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-as-449-22-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:48:00 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:48:00 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-as-449-22-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150170 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-07-07 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-07-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 15 SO 294/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-15-so-294-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:47:58 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:47:58 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-15-so-294-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149685 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-07-07 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-07-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 10 SF 58/21 E [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-10-sf-58-21-e [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:43:32 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:43:32 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-10-sf-58-21-e/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 147258 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-07-07 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-07-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 15 VG 17/22 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-15-vg-17-22-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:21:40 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:21:40 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-15-vg-17-22-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 147252 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-07-07 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-07-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 AS 395/22 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-as-395-22-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:21:37 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:21:37 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-as-395-22-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 147248 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-07-07 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-07-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 18 R 761/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-18-r-761-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:21:35 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:21:35 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-18-r-761-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 131528 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-07-07 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-07-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 32 AS 1379/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-32-as-1379-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 00:58:37 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 23:58:37 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-32-as-1379-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 131526 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-07-07 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-07-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 AS 150/22 NZB [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-as-150-22-nzb [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 00:58:35 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 23:58:35 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-as-150-22-nzb/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 131277 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-07-07 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-07-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 AS 23/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-as-23-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 00:55:54 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 23:55:54 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-as-23-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130696 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-07-07 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-07-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 AS 560/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-as-560-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:07:59 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:07:59 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-as-560-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130695 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-07-07 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-07-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 AS 559/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-as-559-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:07:58 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:07:58 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-as-559-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87795 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-07-07 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-07-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 10 ÜG 4/21 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-10-ueg-4-21-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:11:03 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:11:03 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-10-ueg-4-21-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 138160 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-07-08 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-07-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 KA 57/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-ka-57-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:01:03 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:01:03 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-ka-57-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 5bee4278201f62b2d4c44a2f3c7d34a3 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:925cca63843a98c3b63b5c145cec744c:0.53094000 1749444433 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.