| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Heilbronn | S 8 R 1512/17 | 20.04.2018 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 9 BA 1892/18 | 17.02.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 5 R 34/21 R | 03.02.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | 7. Juli 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 32 AS 3361/19 | 29.06.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 19 AS 1204/20 | 19.11.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 4 AS 2/21 R | 29.03.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | 7. Juli 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 9 KR 1014/16 | 31.07.2019 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 1 KR 106/19 | 21.01.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 5/21 R | 26.04.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | 7. Juli 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Hamburg | S 46 KR 1137/16 | 18.12.2017 | Landessozialgericht Hamburg | L 1 KR 19/18 | 24.01.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 3/21 R | 10.03.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | 7. Juli 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 17 AS 4047/19 | 18.11.2021 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 18 AS 1632/21 | 11.05.2022 | - | Sozialgericht Berlin | 6. Juli 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 63 KR 1528/15 | 20.02.2019 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 16 KR 318/19 | 24.02.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 6. Juli 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 49 R 19/19 | 24.01.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 21 R 237/20 | 11.06.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | B 5 R 5/22 C | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 6. Juli 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 55 As 1412/22 ER | 28.03.2022 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 19 AS 329/22 B ER | 17.05.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 6. Juli 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 94 AS 6885/20 | 23.09.2021 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 19 AS 1242/21 | 19.05.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 6. Juli 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 124 AS 1214/22 ER | 31.03.2022 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 19 AS 429/22 B ER | 10.06.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 6. Juli 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 123 AS 8579/19 | 24.03.2022 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 19 AS 342/22 NZB | 07.06.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 6. Juli 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Potsdam | S 6 AL 112/17 | 09.03.2021 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 18 AL 25/21 | 11.05.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 6. Juli 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Neuruppin | S 12 AL 129/17 | 27.02.2020 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 18 AL 46/20 | 11.05.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 6. Juli 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Cottbus | S 9 AL 236/16 | 19.02.2020 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 18 AL 35/20 | 20.04.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 11 AL 19/22 B | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 6. Juli 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Potsdam | S 23 AS 279/21 | 21.10.2021 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 18 AL 38/22 NZB | 02.05.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 6. Juli 2022 | ||
| Thüringer Landessozialgericht | L 1 U 50/99 | 19.02.2003 | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | L 1 U 909/21 | 28.04.2022 | - | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | 5. Juli 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Köln | S 19 AS 497/22 ER | 04.03.2022 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 2 AS 385/22 B ER, L 2 AS 386/22 B | 22.04.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 5. Juli 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Aachen | S 13 KG 1/22 ER | 02.03.2022 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 13 KG 2/22 B ER | 05.05.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 5. Juli 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Detmold | S 8 AS 174/22 ER | 11.03.2022 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 2 AS 468/22 B ER | 12.05.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 5. Juli 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 4 R 1566/18 | 25.06.2020 | - | - | Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | 5. Juli 2022 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Landshut | S 11 KG 1/20 | 24.06.2022 | - | - | Sozialgericht Landshut | 5. Juli 2022 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Nordhausen | S 1 U 739/18 | 17.09.2019 | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | L 1 U 1409/19 | 24.03.2022 | - | Sozialgericht Nordhausen | 5. Juli 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Nordhausen | S 1 U 2492/15 | 04.02.2019 | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | L 1 U 337/19 | 24.03.2022 | - | Sozialgericht Nordhausen | 5. Juli 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Gotha | S 4 VE 409/18 WA | 16.05.2019 | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | L 1 SV 994/19 | 24.03.2022 | - | Sozialgericht Gotha | 5. Juli 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Gotha | S 3 SB 2372/20 | 15.11.2021 | Thüringer Landessozialgericht | L 5 SB 1045/21 B | 19.04.2022 | - | Sozialgericht Gotha | 5. Juli 2022 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 215 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 215 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 215 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 5350, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87794 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-07-07 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-07-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 5 R 34/21 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-5-r-34-21-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:11:02 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:11:02 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-5-r-34-21-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87793 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-07-07 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-07-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 4 AS 2/21 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-4-as-2-21-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:11:00 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:11:00 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-4-as-2-21-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87792 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-07-07 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-07-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 1 KR 5/21 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-1-kr-5-21-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:10:59 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:10:59 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-1-kr-5-21-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87791 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-07-07 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-07-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 1 KR 3/21 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-1-kr-3-21-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:10:57 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:10:57 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-1-kr-3-21-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150166 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-07-06 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-07-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 18 AS 1632/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-18-as-1632-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:47:55 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:47:55 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-18-as-1632-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 147243 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-07-06 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-07-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 16 KR 318/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-16-kr-318-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:21:33 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:21:33 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-16-kr-318-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 147239 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-07-06 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-07-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 21 R 237/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-21-r-237-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:21:30 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:21:30 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-21-r-237-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128127 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-07-06 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-07-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 19 AS 329/22 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-19-as-329-22-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:36:45 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:36:45 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-19-as-329-22-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128124 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-07-06 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-07-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 19 AS 1242/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-19-as-1242-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:36:43 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:36:43 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-19-as-1242-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128121 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-07-06 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-07-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 19 AS 429/22 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-19-as-429-22-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:36:42 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:36:42 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-19-as-429-22-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128118 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-07-06 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-07-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 19 AS 342/22 NZB [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-19-as-342-22-nzb [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:36:40 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:36:40 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-19-as-342-22-nzb/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128115 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-07-06 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-07-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 18 AL 25/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-18-al-25-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:36:39 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:36:39 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-18-al-25-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128112 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-07-06 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-07-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 18 AL 46/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-18-al-46-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:36:37 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:36:37 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-18-al-46-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128109 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-07-06 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-07-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 18 AL 35/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-18-al-35-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:36:35 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:36:35 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-18-al-35-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128106 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-07-06 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-07-06 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 18 AL 38/22 NZB [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-18-al-38-22-nzb [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:36:34 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:36:34 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-18-al-38-22-nzb/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 151003 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-07-05 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-07-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 U 909/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-u-909-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 13:01:03 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 12:01:03 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-u-909-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 147234 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-07-05 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-07-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 AS 385/22 B ER, L 2 AS 386/22 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-as-385-22-b-er-l-2-as-386-22-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:21:28 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:21:28 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-as-385-22-b-er-l-2-as-386-22-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 147230 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-07-05 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-07-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 13 KG 2/22 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-13-kg-2-22-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:21:26 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:21:26 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-13-kg-2-22-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 147225 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-07-05 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-07-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 AS 468/22 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-as-468-22-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:21:23 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:21:23 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-as-468-22-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 144968 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-07-05 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-07-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 4 R 1566/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-4-r-1566-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 03:00:46 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 02:00:46 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-4-r-1566-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 133684 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-07-05 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-07-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 11 KG 1/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-11-kg-1-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:15:57 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:15:57 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-11-kg-1-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 131885 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-07-05 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-07-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 U 1409/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-u-1409-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:02:34 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:02:34 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-u-1409-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 131882 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-07-05 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-07-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 U 337/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-u-337-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:02:32 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:02:32 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-u-337-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 131392 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-07-05 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-07-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 SV 994/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-sv-994-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 00:57:06 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 23:57:06 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-sv-994-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 131389 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-07-05 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-07-05 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 SB 1045/21 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-sb-1045-21-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 00:57:04 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 23:57:04 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-sb-1045-21-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87794 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-07-07 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-07-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 5 R 34/21 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-5-r-34-21-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:11:02 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:11:02 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-5-r-34-21-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 7c355ba92e94a74291f3986077d0448f [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:75a876d7e1a80413ab9f2498427ac113:0.72727200 1749444642 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.