| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 19 AL 125/19 | 21.10.2019 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 AL 151/19 | 09.06.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 8 SO 22/22 B | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 4. Juli 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 9 SO 302/16 | 20.06.2017 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 SO 78/17 | 18.05.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 8 SO 22/22 B | 22.12.2023 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 4. Juli 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Marburg | S 17 KA 735/16 | 30.03.2022 | - | - | Sozialgericht Marburg | 1. Juli 2022 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 75 BK 78/16 | 26.06.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 9 BK 15/21 | 24.02.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 1. Juli 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Köln | S 2 AS 1240/21 | 18.10.2021 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 19 AS 1736/21 | 05.05.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 1. Juli 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Gelsenkirchen | S 54 AS 120/20 | 28.09.2021 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 19 AS 1634/21 | 05.05.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 4 AS 68/22 B | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 1. Juli 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Detmold | S 9 AS 148/14 | 21.02.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 6 AS 370/20 | 28.10.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | B 4 AS 36/22 BH | 11.05.2022 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 1. Juli 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 13 KR 346/20 | 20.04.2021 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 10 KR 453/21 | 15.09.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 KR 53/21 B | 03.06.2022 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 1. Juli 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Landshut | S 10 KR 392/20 | 22.06.2022 | - | - | Sozialgericht Landshut | 1. Juli 2022 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Münster | S 15 KR 189/16 | 15.04.2019 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 16 KR 410/19 | 02.09.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 KR 61/21 B | 04.04.2022 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 30. Juni 2022 |
| Sozialgericht München | S 27 R 1792/17 | 13.09.2018 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 16 BA 164/18 | 14.10.2021 | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 29. Juni 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 6 SB 2353/19 | 12.11.2020 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 6 SB 3937/20 | 18.11.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 28. Juni 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Reutlingen | S 4 SB 2361/18 | 08.05.2020 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 6 SB 1613/20 | 18.11.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 28. Juni 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Heilbronn | S 7 SB 514/18 | 13.04.2020 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 3 SB 1454/20 | 27.10.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 28. Juni 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 22 U 417/21 | 05.05.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 9 U 1948/21 | 19.10.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 28. Juni 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Reutlingen | S 5 AS 408/19 | 20.05.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 9 AS 2101/21 | 19.10.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 28. Juni 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Reutlingen | S 5 AS 714/19 | 18.05.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 9 AS 2098/21 | 19.10.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 28. Juni 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 49 R 108/19 | 09.07.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 21 R 597/20 | 15.01.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 28. Juni 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 89 KR 2472/18 | 08.04.2021 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 1 KR 45/22 B | 11.05.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 28. Juni 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Cottbus | S 29 AS 1486/19 | 03.11.2021 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 1 AS 1282/21 NZB | 25.05.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 28. Juni 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 100 AS 4376/19 | 05.01.2021 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 1 AS 202/21 NZB | 15.10.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 28. Juni 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Potsdam | S 7 KR 69/17 | 30.01.2019 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 1 KR 108/19 | 05.04.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 28. Juni 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 65 AS 17463/16 | 05.03.2018 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 1 AS 456/21 WA | 16.03.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 28. Juni 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 87 KA 247/14 | 13.12.2017 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 7 KA 10/18 | 09.02.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 6 KA 3/22 R | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 28. Juni 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 36 KR 2328/14 | 01.12.2017 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 1 KR 5/18 | 08.12.2020 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 28. Juni 2022 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 216 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 216 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 216 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 5375, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160746 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-07-04 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-07-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 AL 151/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-al-151-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:26:39 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:26:39 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-al-151-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160743 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-07-04 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-07-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 SO 78/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-so-78-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:26:36 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:26:36 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-so-78-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 149679 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-07-01 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-07-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 17 KA 735/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-17-ka-735-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:43:28 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:43:28 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-17-ka-735-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 147219 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-07-01 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-07-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 BK 15/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-bk-15-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:21:20 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:21:20 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-bk-15-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 147215 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-07-01 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-07-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 19 AS 1736/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-19-as-1736-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:21:17 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:21:17 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-19-as-1736-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 147209 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-07-01 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-07-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 19 AS 1634/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-19-as-1634-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:21:14 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:21:14 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-19-as-1634-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 147204 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-07-01 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-07-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 AS 370/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-as-370-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:21:12 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:21:12 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-as-370-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 147200 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-07-01 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-07-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 KR 453/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-kr-453-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:21:09 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:21:09 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-kr-453-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 133681 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-07-01 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-07-01 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 10 KR 392/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-10-kr-392-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:15:56 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:15:56 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-10-kr-392-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 147195 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-06-30 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-06-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 16 KR 410/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-16-kr-410-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:21:07 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:21:07 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-16-kr-410-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130694 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-06-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-06-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 16 BA 164/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-16-ba-164-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:07:55 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:07:55 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-16-ba-164-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 157221 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-06-28 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-06-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 SB 3937/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-sb-3937-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:43:24 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:43:24 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-sb-3937-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 157217 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-06-28 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-06-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 SB 1613/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-sb-1613-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:43:21 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:43:21 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-sb-1613-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 157212 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-06-28 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-06-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 SB 1454/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-sb-1454-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:43:18 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:43:18 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-sb-1454-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 157208 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-06-28 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-06-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 U 1948/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-u-1948-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:43:15 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:43:15 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-u-1948-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 157204 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-06-28 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-06-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 AS 2101/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-as-2101-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:43:12 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:43:12 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-as-2101-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 157200 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-06-28 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-06-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 AS 2098/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-as-2098-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:43:10 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:43:10 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-as-2098-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 147191 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-06-28 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-06-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 21 R 597/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-21-r-597-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:21:04 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:21:04 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-21-r-597-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128101 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-06-28 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-06-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 45/22 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-45-22-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:36:31 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:36:31 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-45-22-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128098 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-06-28 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-06-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 AS 1282/21 NZB [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-as-1282-21-nzb [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:36:30 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:36:30 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-as-1282-21-nzb/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128095 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-06-28 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-06-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 AS 202/21 NZB [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-as-202-21-nzb [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:36:28 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:36:28 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-as-202-21-nzb/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128092 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-06-28 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-06-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 108/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-108-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:36:26 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:36:26 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-108-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128089 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-06-28 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-06-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 AS 456/21 WA [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-as-456-21-wa [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:36:25 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:36:25 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-as-456-21-wa/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128085 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-06-28 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-06-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 KA 10/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-ka-10-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:36:22 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:36:22 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-ka-10-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128082 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-06-28 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-06-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 KR 5/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-kr-5-18-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:36:20 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:36:20 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-kr-5-18-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160746 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-07-04 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-07-04 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 AL 151/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-al-151-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:26:39 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:26:39 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-al-151-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => cd40d2231efe5adaded6a70a6547e4d5 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:98f6c62cc85c088b2d40ad29b658af6f:0.42956600 1749459029 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.