| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 56 BA 212/20 ER | 04.11.2020 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 1 BA 76/20 B ER | 12.01.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 28. Juni 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 71 KA 93/00 | 11.12.2002 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 7 KA 10/20 WA | 22.12.2020 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 28. Juni 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 41 SB 1979/18 | 28.05.2021 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 13 SB 143/21 | 09.06.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 28. Juni 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht München | S 46 SO 186/20 | 09.06.2022 | - | - | Sozialgericht München | 24. Juni 2022 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Cottbus | S 35 SB 165/17 | 05.05.2021 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 13 SB 123/21 | 16.06.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 23. Juni 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 40 SB 386/18 | 15.04.2021 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 13 SB 83/21 | 14.06.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 23. Juni 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Potsdam | S 13 VG 27/11 | 22.05.2014 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 11 VG 44/14 | 10.05.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 23. Juni 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Darmstadt | S 31 P 103/16 | 08.03.2019 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 6 P 18/19 | 24.06.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 3 P 6/20 R | 17.02.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | 23. Juni 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Darmstadt | S 20 AS 156/22 ER | 30.03.2022 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 6 AS 196/22 B ER | 13.06.2022 | - | Sozialgericht Darmstadt | 22. Juni 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Darmstadt | S 20 AS 156/22 ER | 30.03.2022 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 6 AS 196/22 B ER | 13.06.2022 | - | Sozialgericht Darmstadt | 22. Juni 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 11 SB 3230/18 | 06.05.2020 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 6 SB 1841/20 | 09.12.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 21. Juni 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 20 SB 6741/17 | 25.07.2019 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 6 SB 2982/19 | 09.12.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 21. Juni 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Reutlingen | S 5 AS 1704/19 | 18.05.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 9 AS 2100/21 | 19.10.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 21. Juni 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht München | S 21 KA 1179/13 | 21.09.2016 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 12 KA 126/16 | 17.03.2021 | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 21. Juni 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Cottbus | S 35 SB 25/19 | 13.01.2021 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 13 SB 33/21 | 15.06.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 21. Juni 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Chemnitz | S 27 AY 10/20 | 30.03.2021 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 AY 4/21 | 18.05.2022 | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 20. Juni 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 17 AS 4670/16 | 16.04.2021 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 AS 568/21 | 17.03.2022 | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 20. Juni 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 22 R 1044/20 | 01.03.2021 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 4 R 157/21 | 12.04.2022 | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 20. Juni 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Chemnitz | S 24 AS 3714/18 | 28.02.2020 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 AS 243/20 | 12.05.2022 | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 20. Juni 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 19 AL 352/17 | 17.12.2019 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 AL 12/20 | 31.03.2022 | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 20. Juni 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 15 KR 1035/16 | 14.08.2019 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 9 KR 264/19 | 08.02.2022 | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 20. Juni 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Leipzig | S 22 KR 88/16 | 22.05.2017 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 9 KR 558/17 | 19.05.2022 | - | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | 20. Juni 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Heilbronn | S 14 SB 68/20 | 14.08.2020 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 6 SB 2971/20 | 18.11.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 17. Juni 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Ulm | S 2 SB 3904/18 | 19.10.2020 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 6 SB 3746/20 | 18.11.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 17. Juni 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Heilbronn | S 10 SB 3143/20 | 19.03.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 6 SB 1088/21 | 18.11.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 17. Juni 2022 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 217 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 217 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 217 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 5400, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128079 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-06-28 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-06-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 BA 76/20 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-ba-76-20-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:36:19 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:36:19 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-ba-76-20-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128076 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-06-28 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-06-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 KA 10/20 WA [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-ka-10-20-wa [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:36:18 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:36:18 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-ka-10-20-wa/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128072 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-06-28 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-06-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 13 SB 143/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-13-sb-143-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:36:15 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:36:15 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-13-sb-143-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143467 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-06-24 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-06-24 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 46 SO 186/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-46-so-186-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:39:46 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:39:46 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-46-so-186-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128069 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-06-23 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-06-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 13 SB 123/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-13-sb-123-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:36:14 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:36:14 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-13-sb-123-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128066 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-06-23 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-06-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 13 SB 83/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-13-sb-83-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:36:12 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:36:12 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-13-sb-83-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128063 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-06-23 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-06-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 VG 44/14 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-vg-44-14 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:36:10 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:36:10 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-vg-44-14/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87790 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-06-23 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-06-23 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 3 P 6/20 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-3-p-6-20-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:10:56 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:10:56 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-3-p-6-20-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 136717 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-06-22 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-06-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 20 AS 156/22 ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-20-as-156-22-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:40:36 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:40:36 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-20-as-156-22-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 136712 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-06-22 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-06-22 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 AS 196/22 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-as-196-22-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:40:35 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:40:35 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-as-196-22-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 157197 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-06-21 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-06-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 SB 1841/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-sb-1841-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:43:08 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:43:08 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-sb-1841-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 157193 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-06-21 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-06-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 SB 2982/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-sb-2982-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:43:05 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:43:05 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-sb-2982-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 157189 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-06-21 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-06-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 AS 2100/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-as-2100-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:43:03 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:43:03 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-as-2100-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130693 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-06-21 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-06-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 12 KA 126/16 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-12-ka-126-16 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:07:53 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:07:53 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-12-ka-126-16/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128059 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-06-21 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-06-21 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 13 SB 33/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-13-sb-33-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:36:08 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:36:08 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-13-sb-33-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160740 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-06-20 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-06-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 AY 4/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-ay-4-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:26:33 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:26:33 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-ay-4-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160737 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-06-20 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-06-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 AS 568/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-as-568-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:26:31 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:26:31 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-as-568-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160734 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-06-20 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-06-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 R 157/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-r-157-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:26:29 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:26:29 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-r-157-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160731 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-06-20 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-06-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 AS 243/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-as-243-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:26:26 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:26:26 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-as-243-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160728 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-06-20 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-06-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 AL 12/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-al-12-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:26:24 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:26:24 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-al-12-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160725 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-06-20 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-06-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 KR 264/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-kr-264-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:26:22 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:26:22 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-kr-264-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160722 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-06-20 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-06-20 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 KR 558/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-kr-558-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:26:19 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:26:19 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-kr-558-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 157186 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-06-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-06-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 SB 2971/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-sb-2971-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:43:01 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:43:01 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-sb-2971-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 157181 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-06-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-06-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 SB 3746/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-sb-3746-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:42:57 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:42:57 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-sb-3746-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 157176 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-06-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-06-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 SB 1088/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-sb-1088-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:42:54 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:42:54 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-sb-1088-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128079 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-06-28 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-06-28 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 1 BA 76/20 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-1-ba-76-20-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:36:19 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:36:19 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-1-ba-76-20-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => a7eda32e2adbabe111945e10cb0cc430 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:10faf878dea274cdbc1b999332fc7464:0.74184400 1749458917 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.