| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 14 KR 2710/19 | 09.11.2020 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 11 KR 3929/20 | 24.05.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 17. Juni 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 3 KR 2952/20 | 17.06.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 11 KR 2298/21 | 24.05.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 17. Juni 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Heilbronn | S 7 SB 2183/18 | 04.05.2020 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 6 SB 1788/20 | 18.11.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 15. Juni 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Mannheim | S 11 R 2772/18 | 18.05.2020 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 13 R 1964/20 | 11.01.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 15. Juni 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht München | S 28 KR 499/21 | 05.10.2021 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 12 KR 546/21 | 08.04.2022 | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 15. Juni 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Würzburg | S 9 AY 185/21 ER | 21.01.2022 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 8 AY 27/22 B ER | 11.05.2022 | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 15. Juni 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 198 KR 3895/15 | 26.02.2019 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 28 BA 29/19 | 08.06.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 15. Juni 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 198 KR 3895/15 | 26.02.2019 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 28 BA 29/19 | 08.06.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 15. Juni 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Magdeburg | S 1 KA 25/18 | 18.11.2020 | - | Bundessozialgericht | B 6 KA 2/21 R | 26.01.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | 14. Juni 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 6 R 592/17 | 04.07.2018 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 2 R 266/18 | 28.09.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | B 5 R 291/21 B | 13.04.2022 | Sozialgericht Frankfurt | 13. Juni 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Regensburg | S 8 KR 1521/19 | 10.11.2021 | - | - | Sozialgericht Regensburg | 13. Juni 2022 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Trier | S 1 AS 104/15 | 14.04.2016 | Landessozialgericht Rheinland-Pfalz | L 3 AS 280/16 | 19.12.2017 | Bundessozialgericht | B 7/14 AS 30/21 R | 09.03.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | 13. Juni 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Hannover | S 61 KA 382/16 | 15.11.2017 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 3 KA 89/17 | 24.02.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | B 6 KA 4/21 R | 26.01.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | 13. Juni 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Ulm | S 13 KR 3667/13 | 06.08.2015 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 11 KR 717/18 ZVW | 23.07.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 35/20 R | 10.03.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | 13. Juni 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Ulm | S 9 U 1332/15 | 02.02.2017 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 3 U 4097/20 | 27.04.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 10. Juni 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 9 BA 729/20 | 20.10.2020 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 4 BA 3707/20 | 20.05.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 10. Juni 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Ulm | S 3 KR 63/17 | 07.10.2020 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 4 KR 4017/20 | 20.05.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 10. Juni 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Köln | S 6 AS 2858/21 ER | 18.10.2021 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 7 AS 1746/21 B ER | 19.04.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 10. Juni 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Duisburg | S 6 U 518/18 | 13.02.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 17 U 210/20 | 25.05.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 2 U 85/22 B | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 10. Juni 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Köln | S 13 R 1378/17 | 21.03.2019 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 3 R 341/19 | 14.01.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 R 7/22 B | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 10. Juni 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 14 SF 38/22 E | 01.02.2022 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 2 AS 292/22 B | 01.04.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 10. Juni 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht München | S 43 KA 113/15 | 30.01.2018 | - | - | Sozialgericht München | 10. Juni 2022 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Augsburg | S 5 U 281/12 | 19.03.2013 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 2 U 140/13 | 17.05.2013 | - | Sozialgericht Augsburg | 10. Juni 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Augsburg | S 3 KR 377/21 | 31.05.2022 | - | - | Sozialgericht Augsburg | 10. Juni 2022 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 6 R 592/17 | 04.07.2018 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 2 R 266/18 | 28.09.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | B 5 R 291/21 B | 13.04.2022 | Sozialgericht Frankfurt | 10. Juni 2022 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 218 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 218 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 218 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 5425, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 157171 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-06-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-06-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 KR 3929/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-kr-3929-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:42:50 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:42:50 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-kr-3929-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 157166 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-06-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-06-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 KR 2298/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-kr-2298-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:42:47 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:42:47 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-kr-2298-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 157161 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-06-15 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-06-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 SB 1788/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-sb-1788-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:42:44 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:42:44 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-sb-1788-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 157157 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-06-15 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-06-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 13 R 1964/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-13-r-1964-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:42:41 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:42:41 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-13-r-1964-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130692 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-06-15 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-06-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 12 KR 546/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-12-kr-546-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:07:51 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:07:51 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-12-kr-546-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130691 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-06-15 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-06-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 AY 27/22 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-ay-27-22-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:07:49 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:07:49 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-ay-27-22-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128057 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-06-15 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-06-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 28 BA 29/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-28-ba-29-19-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:36:07 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:36:07 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-28-ba-29-19-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128056 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-06-15 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-06-15 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 28 BA 29/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-28-ba-29-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:36:07 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:36:07 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-28-ba-29-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87789 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-06-14 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-06-14 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 6 KA 2/21 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-6-ka-2-21-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:10:53 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:10:53 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-6-ka-2-21-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 136845 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-06-13 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-06-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 6 R 592/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-6-r-592-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:41:21 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:41:21 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-6-r-592-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 131193 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-06-13 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-06-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 8 KR 1521/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-8-kr-1521-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 00:55:03 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 23:55:03 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-8-kr-1521-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87788 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-06-13 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-06-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 7/14 AS 30/21 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-7-14-as-30-21-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:10:51 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:10:51 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-7-14-as-30-21-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87787 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-06-13 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-06-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 6 KA 4/21 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-6-ka-4-21-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:10:50 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:10:50 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-6-ka-4-21-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87786 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-06-13 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-06-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 1 KR 35/20 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-1-kr-35-20-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:10:48 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:10:48 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-1-kr-35-20-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 157152 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-06-10 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-06-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 U 4097/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-u-4097-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:42:38 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:42:38 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-u-4097-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 157148 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-06-10 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-06-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 BA 3707/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-ba-3707-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:42:36 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:42:36 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-ba-3707-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 157143 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-06-10 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-06-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 KR 4017/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-kr-4017-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:42:32 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:42:32 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-kr-4017-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 147186 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-06-10 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-06-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 AS 1746/21 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-as-1746-21-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:21:01 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:21:01 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-as-1746-21-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 147181 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-06-10 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-06-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 17 U 210/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-17-u-210-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:20:59 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:20:59 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-17-u-210-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 147175 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-06-10 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-06-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 R 341/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-r-341-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:20:56 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:20:56 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-r-341-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 147169 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-06-10 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-06-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 AS 292/22 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-as-292-22-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:20:52 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:20:52 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-as-292-22-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143463 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-06-10 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-06-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 43 KA 113/15 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-43-ka-113-15 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:39:44 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:39:44 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-43-ka-113-15/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140303 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-06-10 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-06-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 5 U 281/12 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-5-u-281-12 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:17:42 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:17:42 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-5-u-281-12/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 140301 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-06-10 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-06-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 3 KR 377/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-3-kr-377-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:17:40 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:17:40 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-3-kr-377-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 136841 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-06-10 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-06-10 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 R 266/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-r-266-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:41:20 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:41:20 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-r-266-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 157171 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-06-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-06-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 KR 3929/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-kr-3929-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:42:50 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:42:50 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-kr-3929-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 52a56b8cdb008058b95fa40fe7d15544 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:beab9bb73354562e19633dd73a1786ef:0.59775700 1749471405 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.