| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Aachen | S 15 AL 220/18 | 22.10.2019 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 20 AL 170/19 | 21.02.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 11 AL 6/22 BH | 11.05.2022 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 9. Juni 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Düsseldorf | S 4 R 1566/18 | 25.06.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 4 R 568/20 | 10.09.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | B 5 R 35/21 BH | 27.04.2022 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 9. Juni 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 9 R 2724/20 | 04.02.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 4 R 515/21 | 15.10.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 8. Juni 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 15 KR 2192/20 | 19.01.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 4 KR 645/21 | 15.10.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 8. Juni 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Heilbronn | S 16 KR 2335/18 | 31.07.2020 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 4 KR 3155/20 | 15.10.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 8. Juni 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 18 AS 4559/20 | 23.02.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 3 AS 925/21 | 21.04.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 8. Juni 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 18 AS 4212/20 | 23.02.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 3 AS 926/21 | 21.04.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 8. Juni 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 17 U 2183/17 | 07.11.2019 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 8 U 1207/20 | 12.05.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 8. Juni 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Konstanz | S 6 SB 1233/19 | 21.01.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 6 SB 464/21 | 18.11.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 8. Juni 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 17 U 725/15 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 15 U 547/17 | 19.12.2019 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 8. Juni 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Frankfurt | S 36 SB 445/21 | 16.03.2022 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 3 SB 46/22 B | 16.05.2022 | - | Sozialgericht Frankfurt | 8. Juni 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Mannheim | S 1 U 3025/19 | 05.02.2020 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 3 U 776/20 | 23.06.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 7. Juni 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 20 R 820/19Q | 20.04.2020 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 13 R 1599/20 | 11.05.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 7. Juni 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 14 AS 2297/20 | 12.08.2020 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 13 AS 2528/20 | 07.07.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 7. Juni 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Mannheim | S 12 R 1826/18 | 02.12.2020 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 9 R 4114/20 | 19.10.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 7. Juni 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Konstanz | S 7 U 1267/18 | 31.10.2018 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 9 U 4281/18 | 19.10.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 7. Juni 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Reutlingen | S 5 AS 1161/19 | 18.05.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 9 AS 2099/21 | 19.10.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 7. Juni 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Duisburg | S 60 KR 2053/20 | 30.03.2022 | - | - | Sozialgericht Duisburg | 7. Juni 2022 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Duisburg | S 39 KR 342/22 KH ER | 03.05.2022 | - | - | Sozialgericht Duisburg | 7. Juni 2022 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Schleswig | S 10 R 8077/16 | 02.05.2018 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 16 BA 124/18 | 10.06.2021 | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 7. Juni 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht München | S 26 R 440/16 | 29.05.2020 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 7 BA 76/20 | 10.05.2021 | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 7. Juni 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Heilbronn | S 2 AL 2525/15 | 17.01.2017 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 13 AL 437/17 | 13.04.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 3. Juni 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Konstanz | S 10 R 1213/16 | 06.08.2019 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 13 R 3293/19 | 13.04.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 3. Juni 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Mannheim | S 13 R 1726/16 | 19.12.2019 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 8 BA 348/20 | 19.03.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 3. Juni 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 20 R 4008/18 | 27.04.2020 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 4 R 2016/20 | 15.10.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 3. Juni 2022 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 219 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 219 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 219 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 5450, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 147164 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-06-09 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-06-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 20 AL 170/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-20-al-170-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:20:50 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:20:50 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-20-al-170-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 147159 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-06-09 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-06-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 R 568/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-r-568-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:20:48 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:20:48 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-r-568-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 157139 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-06-08 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-06-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 R 515/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-r-515-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:42:30 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:42:30 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-r-515-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 157135 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-06-08 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-06-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 KR 645/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-kr-645-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:42:27 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:42:27 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-kr-645-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 157132 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-06-08 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-06-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 KR 3155/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-kr-3155-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:42:25 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:42:25 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-kr-3155-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 157128 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-06-08 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-06-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 AS 925/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-as-925-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:42:23 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:42:23 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-as-925-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 157123 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-06-08 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-06-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 AS 926/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-as-926-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:42:19 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:42:19 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-as-926-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 157119 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-06-08 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-06-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 U 1207/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-u-1207-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:42:17 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:42:17 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-u-1207-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 157115 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-06-08 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-06-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 SB 464/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-sb-464-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:42:14 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:42:14 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-sb-464-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 147153 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-06-08 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-06-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 15 U 547/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-15-u-547-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:20:44 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:20:44 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-15-u-547-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 136836 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-06-08 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-06-08 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 SB 46/22 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-sb-46-22-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:41:18 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:41:18 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-sb-46-22-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 157111 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-06-07 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-06-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 U 776/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-u-776-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:42:11 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:42:11 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-u-776-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 157107 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-06-07 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-06-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 13 R 1599/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-13-r-1599-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:42:09 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:42:09 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-13-r-1599-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 157103 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-06-07 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-06-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 13 AS 2528/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-13-as-2528-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:42:06 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:42:06 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-13-as-2528-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 157099 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-06-07 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-06-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 R 4114/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-r-4114-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:42:03 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:42:03 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-r-4114-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 157095 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-06-07 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-06-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 U 4281/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-u-4281-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:42:01 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:42:01 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-u-4281-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 157091 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-06-07 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-06-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 AS 2099/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-as-2099-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:41:59 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:41:59 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-as-2099-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143411 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-06-07 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-06-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 60 KR 2053/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-60-kr-2053-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:39:19 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:39:19 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-60-kr-2053-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 143407 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-06-07 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-06-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 39 KR 342/22 KH ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-39-kr-342-22-kh-er-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:39:17 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:39:17 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-39-kr-342-22-kh-er-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130690 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-06-07 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-06-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 16 BA 124/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-16-ba-124-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:07:47 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:07:47 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-16-ba-124-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130689 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-06-07 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-06-07 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 BA 76/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-ba-76-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:07:45 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:07:45 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-ba-76-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 157087 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-06-03 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-06-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 13 AL 437/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-13-al-437-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:41:56 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:41:56 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-13-al-437-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 157083 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-06-03 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-06-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 13 R 3293/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-13-r-3293-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:41:54 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:41:54 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-13-r-3293-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 157079 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-06-03 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-06-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 BA 348/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-ba-348-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:41:51 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:41:51 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-ba-348-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 157075 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-06-03 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-06-03 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 R 2016/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-r-2016-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:41:49 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:41:49 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-r-2016-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 147164 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-06-09 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-06-09 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 20 AL 170/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-20-al-170-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:20:50 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:20:50 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-20-al-170-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => a2dde6e074d26dd6245b0d98cfbbb689 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:19f9819bf5b2a2196451ad2b55205b41:0.60256800 1749480628 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.