| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 24 R 1275/19 | 21.01.2022 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 18 R 149/22 | 09.04.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 18. September 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Münster | S 8 AS 764/18 | 07.07.2022 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 6 AS 1170/22 | 23.04.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 18. September 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 11 SV 47/24 | 15.07.2024 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 5 SF 261/24 ZG | 10.09.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 18. September 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 49 KR 499/20 | 20.04.2021 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 5 KR 551/21 | 21.03.2024 | Bundessozialgericht | B 12 KR 12/24 R | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 18. September 2024 |
| Sozialgericht Köln | S 9 SF 195/23 BW | 23.11.2023 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 10 KR 1132/23 B | 04.09.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 18. September 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dortmund | S 72 BA 106/23 ER | 23.02.2024 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 8 BA 43/24 B ER | 09.09.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | 18. September 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Dresden | S 18 KR 967/19 | 17.06.2020 | Sächsisches Landessozialgericht | L 1 KR 365/20 | 21.09.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 1 KR 7/23 R | 16.05.2024 | Bundessozialgericht | 18. September 2024 |
| Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 13 U 5491/19 | 14.01.2022 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 8 U 614/22 | 17.11.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 17. September 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Heilbronn | S 2 U 2947/21 | 30.05.2022 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 6 U 1849/22 | 25.04.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 17. September 2024 | ||
| Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 11KR 557/24 | 14.05.2024 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 11 KR 1815/24 | 16.07.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 17. September 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Ulm | S 17 R 957/18 | 23.06.2022 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 9 R 2266/22 | 20.02.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 17. September 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Osnabrück | S 48 KR 28/20 KH | 17.08.2021 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 4 KR 450/21 | 07.12.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 17. September 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Hannover | S 67 KR 910/18 | 25.02.2021 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 4 KR 139/21 | 18.01.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 17. September 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Bremen | S 49 R 178/22 | 21.03.2023 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 12 R 60/23 | 28.09.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 17. September 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Stade | 12 P 26/15 | 20.02.2019 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 12/15 P 18/19 | 24.08.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 17. September 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Bremen | S 26 AS 843/19 | 22.06.2021 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 13 AS 312/21 | 22.05.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 17. September 2024 | ||
| - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 13 SF 3/23 EK VE | 22.11.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | 17. September 2024 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Konstanz | S 4 R 946/24 | 14.08.2024 | - | - | Sozialgericht Konstanz | 17. September 2024 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 126 AS 16541/16 | 21.09.2020 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 4 AS 1456/20 | 25.06.2024 | Bundessozialgericht | B 7 AS 29/24 R | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 17. September 2024 |
| Sozialgericht Altenburg | S 18 R 727/22 | 21.03.2024 | - | - | Sozialgericht Altenburg | 16. September 2024 | ||||
| Sozialgericht Stuttgart | S 11 SO 5056/18 | 16.05.2023 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 2 SO 1793/23 | 07.08.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 13. September 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Ulm | S 1 AS 2295/20 | 02.05.2023 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 2 AS 1661/23 | 20.12.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 13. September 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Reutlingen | S 5 SO 792/21 | 10.05.2022 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 2 SO 1634/22 | 15.03.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 13. September 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Karlsruhe | S 3 SO 686/24 ER | 12.04.2024 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 2 SO 1434/24 ER-B | 04.06.2024 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 13. September 2024 | ||
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 4 R 3541/22 | 23.03.2023 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 2 R 1344/23 | 01.08.2023 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 13. September 2024 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 22 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 22 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 22 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 525, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150882 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-09-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-09-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 18 R 149/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-18-r-149-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:58:40 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:58:40 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-18-r-149-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150880 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-09-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-09-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 AS 1170/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-as-1170-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:58:38 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:58:38 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-as-1170-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150878 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-09-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-09-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 SF 261/24 ZG [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-sf-261-24-zg [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:58:36 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:58:36 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-sf-261-24-zg/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150876 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-09-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-09-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KR 551/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-kr-551-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:58:33 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:58:33 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-kr-551-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150874 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-09-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-09-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 10 KR 1132/23 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-10-kr-1132-23-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:58:30 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:58:30 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-10-kr-1132-23-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150872 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-09-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-09-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 BA 43/24 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-ba-43-24-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:58:28 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:58:28 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-ba-43-24-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 88146 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-09-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-09-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 1 KR 7/23 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-1-kr-7-23-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:21:51 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:21:51 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-1-kr-7-23-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160947 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-09-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-09-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 8 U 614/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-8-u-614-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:29:56 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:29:56 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-8-u-614-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160945 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-09-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-09-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 U 1849/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-u-1849-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:29:53 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:29:53 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-u-1849-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160943 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-09-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-09-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 11 KR 1815/24 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-11-kr-1815-24 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:29:51 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:29:51 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-11-kr-1815-24/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160941 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-09-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-09-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 R 2266/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-r-2266-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:29:49 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:29:49 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-r-2266-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 139614 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-09-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-09-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 KR 450/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-kr-450-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:10:12 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:10:12 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-kr-450-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 139610 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-09-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-09-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 KR 139/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-kr-139-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:10:11 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:10:11 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-kr-139-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 139607 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-09-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-09-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 12 R 60/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-12-r-60-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:10:09 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:10:09 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-12-r-60-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 139601 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-09-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-09-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 12/15 P 18/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-12-15-p-18-19-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:10:07 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:10:07 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-12-15-p-18-19-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 139597 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-09-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-09-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 13 AS 312/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-13-as-312-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:10:05 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:10:05 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-13-as-312-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 139593 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-09-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-09-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 13 SF 3/23 EK VE [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-13-sf-3-23-ek-ve-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:10:03 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:10:03 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-13-sf-3-23-ek-ve-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 131366 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-09-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-09-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 4 R 946/24 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-4-r-946-24 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 00:56:46 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 23:56:46 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-4-r-946-24/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 129702 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-09-17 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-09-17 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 AS 1456/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-as-1456-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:53:01 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:53:01 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-as-1456-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 132288 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-09-16 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-09-16 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 18 R 737/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-18-r-737-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 01:05:20 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 00:05:20 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-18-r-737-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160939 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-09-13 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-09-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 SO 1793/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-so-1793-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:29:46 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:29:46 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-so-1793-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160937 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-09-13 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-09-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 AS 1661/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-as-1661-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:29:43 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:29:43 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-as-1661-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160934 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-09-13 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-09-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 SO 1634/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-so-1634-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:29:40 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:29:40 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-so-1634-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160932 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-09-13 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-09-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 SO 1434/24 ER-B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-so-1434-24-er-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:29:38 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:29:38 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-so-1434-24-er-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 160930 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-09-13 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-09-13 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 2 R 1344/23 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-2-r-1344-23 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 16:29:35 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 15:29:35 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-2-r-1344-23/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 150882 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2024-09-18 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2024-09-18 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 18 R 149/22 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-18-r-149-22 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 12:58:40 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 11:58:40 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-18-r-149-22/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 0d21c62d5677a347e6cb14b2a92168d5 [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:b8f04e6cacf4ebec168e1eedab2cc28c:0.40531000 1745109854 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.