| Erste Instanz | Aktenzeichen (1. Instanz) | Datum (1. Instanz) | Zweite Instanz | Aktenzeichen (2. Instanz) | Datum (2. Instanz) | Dritte Instanz | Aktenzeichen (3. Instanz) | Datum (3. Instanz) | Gericht | Erstellt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sozialgericht Neuruppin | S 43 AS 306/22 ER | 04.04.2022 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 4 AS 357/22 B ER | 16.05.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 31. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Neuruppin | S 43 AS 306/22 ER | 04.04.2022 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 4 AS 357/22 B ER | 16.05.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 31. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 196 U 575/13 | 08.11.2013 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 3 U 72/21 RG | 12.05.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 31. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Berlin | S 196 U 565/18 | 20.06.2021 | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | L 3 U 158/18 | 15.06.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Berlin-Brandenburg | 31. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Kassel | S 10 AS 658/17 | 29.01.2019 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 6 AS 94/20 | 18.05.2022 | - | Sozialgericht Kassel | 30. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Kassel | S 10 AS 658/17 | 29.01.2019 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 6 AS 94/20 | 18.05.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | B 7 AS 15/22 R | - | Sozialgericht Kassel | 30. Mai 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Bayreuth | S 9 EG 15/17 | 19.09.2018 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 9 EG 41/18 | 29.06.2021 | - | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | 30. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Darmstadt | S 21 AS 499/16 | 17.01.2018 | Hessisches Landessozialgericht | L 6 AS 126/18 | 09.09.2020 | Bundessozialgericht | B 7/14 AS 79/20 R | 09.03.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | 30. Mai 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Duisburg | S 38 AS 3561/18 | 17.02.2020 | Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen | L 19 AS 466/20 | 11.03.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | B 7/14 AS 31/21 R | 09.03.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | 30. Mai 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Aurich | S 45 AS 187/17 ua | 26.09.2019 | Landessozialgericht Niedersachsen-Bremen | L 13 AS 266/19 ua | 23.06.2021 | Bundessozialgericht | B 7 AS 20/22 B | 02.05.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | 30. Mai 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Würzburg | S 6 R 794/17 | 27.11.2018 | Bayerisches Landessozialgericht | L 19 R 25/19 | 13.11.2019 | Bundessozialgericht | B 5 R 33/21 R | 03.02.2022 | Bundessozialgericht | 30. Mai 2022 |
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 17 VG 4295/18 | 23.10.2020 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 6 VG 1191/21 | 09.12.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 29. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 8 R 1108/18 | 15.07.2020 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 13 R 3389/20 | 21.10.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 29. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Ulm | S 4 R 2583/16 | 13.09.2019 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 9 R 3589/19 | 19.10.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 29. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Ulm | S 9 U 3799/16 | 04.06.2018 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 9 U 2456/18 | 19.10.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 29. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Heilbronn | S 8 R 1764/17 | 23.12.0019 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 13 R 692/19 | 09.11.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 29. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 15 KR 1858/20 | 15.12.2020 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 5 KR 242/21 | 15.12.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 29. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Ulm | S 9 VG 328/15 | 22.10.2020 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 6 VG 3644/20 | 13.12.0022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 29. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 20 R 2236/17 | 08.10.2019 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 5 BA 3808/19 | 15.12.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 29. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 16 BA 1654/21 ER | 23.06.2021 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 5 BA 2420/21 ER-B | 16.09.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 29. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Mannheim | S 12 R 1995/17 | 20.05.2019 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 7 R 1827/19 | 16.12.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 29. Mai 2022 | ||
| Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 5 KA 1255/20 KL | 30.03.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 29. Mai 2022 | |||
| Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 5 KA 1255/20 KL | 30.03.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 29. Mai 2022 | |||
| Sozialgericht Freiburg | S 21 SO 571/16 | 12.12.2019 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 7 SO 143/20 | 17.02.2022 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 29. Mai 2022 | ||
| Sozialgericht Mannheim | S 13 U 2456/18 | 18.02.2019 | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | L 9 U 1172/19 | 19.10.2021 | - | Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg | 29. Mai 2022 |
Debug Query Arguments:
Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 222 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 )
Debug: WP_Query Objekt:
WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 222 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => entscheidung [posts_per_page] => 25 [paged] => 222 [wpfts_is_force] => 1 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => [tag] => [cat] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => [embed] => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post__not_in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [wpfts_disable] => 0 [ignore_sticky_posts] => [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => [order] => DESC ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [queried_terms] => Array ( ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts WHERE 1=1 AND ((wp_posts.post_type = 'entscheidung' AND (wp_posts.post_status = 'publish'))) ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 5525, 25 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128054 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-31 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-31 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 AS 357/22 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-as-357-22-b-er-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:36:05 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:36:05 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-as-357-22-b-er-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128053 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-31 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-31 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 AS 357/22 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-as-357-22-b-er [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:36:05 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:36:05 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-as-357-22-b-er/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128049 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-31 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-31 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 U 72/21 RG [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-u-72-21-rg [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:36:02 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:36:02 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-u-72-21-rg/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128046 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-31 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-31 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 3 U 158/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-3-u-158-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:36:00 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:36:00 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-3-u-158-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 139195 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-30 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => S 10 AS 658/17 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => s-10-as-658-17 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:07:29 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:07:29 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/s-10-as-658-17/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 139190 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-30 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 AS 94/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-as-94-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 02:07:27 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 01:07:27 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-as-94-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 130682 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-30 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 EG 41/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-eg-41-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 23:07:33 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 22:07:33 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-eg-41-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87784 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-30 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 7/14 AS 79/20 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-7-14-as-79-20-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:10:44 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:10:44 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-7-14-as-79-20-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87783 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-30 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 7/14 AS 31/21 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-7-14-as-31-21-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:10:43 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:10:43 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-7-14-as-31-21-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87782 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-30 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 7 AS 20/22 B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-7-as-20-22-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:10:40 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:10:40 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-7-as-20-22-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 87781 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-30 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-30 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => B 5 R 33/21 R [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => b-5-r-33-21-r [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-21 01:10:39 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-21 00:10:39 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/b-5-r-33-21-r/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 156973 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 VG 1191/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-vg-1191-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:40:42 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:40:42 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-vg-1191-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 156970 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 13 R 3389/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-13-r-3389-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:40:39 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:40:39 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-13-r-3389-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [13] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 156965 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 R 3589/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-r-3589-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:40:36 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:40:36 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-r-3589-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [14] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 156962 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 U 2456/18 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-u-2456-18 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:40:34 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:40:34 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-u-2456-18/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [15] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 156957 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 13 R 692/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-13-r-692-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:40:30 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:40:30 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-13-r-692-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [16] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 156953 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KR 242/21 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-kr-242-21 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:40:28 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:40:28 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-kr-242-21/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [17] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 156948 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 6 VG 3644/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-6-vg-3644-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:40:25 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:40:25 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-6-vg-3644-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [18] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 156944 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 BA 3808/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-ba-3808-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:40:22 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:40:22 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-ba-3808-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [19] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 156940 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 BA 2420/21 ER-B [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-ba-2420-21-er-b [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:40:19 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:40:19 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-ba-2420-21-er-b/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [20] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 156935 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 R 1827/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-r-1827-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:40:15 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:40:15 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-r-1827-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [21] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 156930 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KA 1255/20 KL [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-ka-1255-20-kl-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:40:12 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:40:12 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-ka-1255-20-kl-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [22] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 156929 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 5 KA 1255/20 KL [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-5-ka-1255-20-kl [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:40:12 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:40:12 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-5-ka-1255-20-kl/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [23] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 156926 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 7 SO 143/20 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-7-so-143-20 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:40:09 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:40:09 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-7-so-143-20/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [24] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 156922 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-29 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-29 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 9 U 1172/19 [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-9-u-1172-19 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-23 15:40:06 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-23 14:40:06 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-9-u-1172-19/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 25 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 128054 [post_author] => 9 [post_date] => 2022-05-31 02:00:00 [post_date_gmt] => 2022-05-31 00:00:00 [post_content] => [post_title] => L 4 AS 357/22 B ER [post_excerpt] => [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => l-4-as-357-22-b-er-2 [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2024-12-22 22:36:05 [post_modified_gmt] => 2024-12-22 21:36:05 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://ng.sozialgerichtsbarkeit.de/entscheidung/l-4-as-357-22-b-er-2/ [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => entscheidung [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 90619 [max_num_pages] => 3625 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => 1 [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => 1 [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => e069f2e6d9aede46dec7c0795860a3ba [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => 1 [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:46394f90988552b055bc1a1e600912bb:0.38862000 1749885431 [wpftsi_session] => )
Entscheidungen
Die Suchergebnisse dieses Filters sind standardmäßig nach dem Einstellungs- oder Aktualisierungsdatum sortiert. Sie können die Sortierung ändern, indem Sie auf die jeweiligen Spaltenüberschriften klicken. In der Stichwortsuche werden Suchbegriffe, die durch Leerzeichen getrennt sind, automatisch mit einer „ODER“-Verknüpfung kombiniert. Das bedeutet, dass eine Suche nach „§ 18“ Ergebnisse liefert, die entweder „§“ oder „18“ enthalten. Wenn Sie nach einer exakten Phrase suchen möchten, setzen Sie den Suchbegriff in Anführungszeichen. Eine Suche nach „§ 18“ führt dann nur zu Ergebnissen, die den gesamten Ausdruck enthalten.